scholarly journals Urgensi Beracara di Pengadilan Perdata Terhadap Hukum Acara perdata

PLENO JURE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37
Author(s):  
Oyaldi Puhi ◽  
Rustam Hs Akili ◽  
Ibrahim Ahmad ◽  
Roy Marthen Moonti ◽  
Muten Nuna
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Narrow Sense ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Courts

Hukum acara perdata merupakan hukum perdata formil, yang pada dasarnya berfungsi mempertahankan atau menegakkan hukum perdata materiil melalui pengadilan apabila terjadi pelanggaran terhadap hukum perdata materiil atau terjadi sengketa. Bahkan hukum acara perdata juga mengatur bagaimana tata cara memperoleh hak dan kepastian hukum manakala tidak terjadi sengketa melalui pengajuan “permohonan” ke pengadilan. Artikel ini ingin menjelaskan bagaimana mekanisme beracara di pengadilan perdata terhadap hukum acara perdata, dengan menggunakan metode penulisan secara normatif. Sebagai kesimpulan, artikel ini menjelaskan bahwa didalam beracara hukum acara perdata dapat ditinjau dalam dua aspek yakni dalam arti luas dan dalam arti sempit, dalam arti luas beracara meliputi segala tindakan hukum yang dilakukan, baik di luar maupun di dalam persidangan di pengadilan guna menyelesaikan suatu perkara menurut ketentuan hukum acara perdata. Sedangkan dalam arti sempit, beracara meliputi tindakan beracara di dalam persidang di pengadilan dari sidang pertama sampai dengan hakim menjatuhkan putusannya. Sedangkan untuk prosedur dalam pengajuan Gugatan di Pengadilan merujuk pada Pasal 118 ayat (1) Herizen Indlandsch Reglement (“HIR”)/Pasal 142 RBg. Abstract. Civil procedural law is formal civil law which basically is to defend or enforce material civil law through the court if there is a violation of the law toward material civil law or a dispute. Even the civil procedural law also regulates how to obtain legal rights and certainty, if there is no dispute through filing an "application" to the court. This article aims to explain how the procedure of mechanisms in civil courts toward civil procedural law by using the normative writing method. In conclusion, this article explains that civil procedural law proceedings can be viewed in two aspects, which are broad sense and narrow sense. In the broad sense, it includes all legal actions that are taken both outside and inside the court to resolve the case according to the provisions of civil procedural law. Whereas in a narrow sense, it includes proceeding at trial in court from the first trial until the judge makes his decision. whereas, the procedure for filing a lawsuit in court is referring to Article 118 paragraph (1) Herizen Indlandsch Reglement (“HIR”) / Article 142 RBg.

scholarly journals ON ACCESSORY OBLIGATIONS IN RUSSIAN CIVIL LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1(82)) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
R. Truhan
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Narrow Sense ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Broad Understanding

In the science of civil law, two approaches to the understanding and interpretation of accessory have been formed.  The first approach can be defined as the understanding of accessory in the "narrow" sense, the second - in the "broad" sense. Russian civil law contains signs of accessory in the "narrow" sense. For this reason, the problem of the concept of "accessory" is seen, which is subject to the identification of an accessory legal relationship with a security obligation, which in turn impoverishes the idea of the role of accessory in the system of legal relationships. With the development of circulation and the complication of law, examples of accessory legal relations of a different kind appeared that were not related to security obligations, i.e. "Broad" understanding of accessory, which has an auxiliary, secondary nature of the obligation, which can not always have a security focus.  Russian arbitration courts have developed a number of rules to make up for the shortcomings of the institution of accessory in Russian civil law, and the possibility of using accessory in the "broad" sense. It is concluded that de jure the concept of accessory in Russian civil law is reflected in the "narrow" sense, and de facto, accessory is applied in the "broad" sense.

scholarly journals CHARACTERISTICS WANPRESTASI AND ONRECHTMATIGE DAADAND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
MARKUS SURYOUTOMO
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Contractual Relationship ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Procedural Code ◽  
The Law

<p>Onrechtmatigedaad and wanprestasi claims always rely on a contractual relationship between parties, giving birth to legal rights and obligations. Rights and obligations here are manifested by an achievement. When an achievement is not fulfilled or carried out in accordance with the contents of the agreement, it is called a default. While the act of violating the law the starting point of the lawsuit is the interests of certain parties who are harmed by the actions of other parties, even though between the parties there is no<br />contractual civil law relationship. In this case, the basis for the lawsuit is sufficient to prove whether the perpetrator's actions have actually harmed the other party. In other words, filing a lawsuit in violation of the law is solely oriented to the consequences caused by other parties experiencing losses. Petitum Lawsuit Defaults the plaintiff's demands in the form of: Granting the plaintiff's claim; Stating the Defendant has a Default, Punishing the Defendant to return the Principal, Interest and Profits to be obtained. In a Lawsuit for Violating the Plaintiff's Lawsuit; Stating the Defendant has committed an illegal act; Punish Defendant to pay compensation in the form of Material Compensation and Moriel Compensation. the merging of Unlawful Acts with default in one claim violates the procedural code of conduct because both must be resolved separately</p>

The Right of Sovereignty

2021 ◽  
pp. 66-113
Author(s):  
Daniel Lee
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Sovereign State ◽  
Legal Science ◽  
Law Of Nations ◽  
The Law ◽  
Contractual Obligations ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ius Gentium ◽  
Debt Obligation

Bodin’s most important theoretical achievement was to conceptualize sovereignty as an indivisible and portable bundle of legal rights, which he collectively designated ius summi imperii. Sovereignty, on this account, was modelled on the creditor’s in personam right arising from a debt obligation in civil law. Just as a creditor has a right to an actionable remedy enforcing the debtor’s performance of contractual obligations, so too does a sovereign state have a legal right to enforce acts of allegiance owed by its subjects and, in the case of treaty obligations, acts of fidelity owed by foreign obligors. Applying a doctrine of medieval legal science, Bodin traced the source of that sovereign right to the law of nations [ius gentium]. While sovereigns may be exempt from their own legislation [legibus soluti], they always remain legally bound to observe the ius gentium and exercise sovereign rights in accordance with its principles.

Legal Devices, Law Enforcement, Facilities and Infrastructure

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Lasmi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Litigation ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice

Abstract The importance of law enforcement agencies or the judiciary that can help enforce the law to resolve the problems its faces. Therefore, the main task of the court is to maintain the law, both in the form of criminal law and civil law. In the case of civil procedural law, it is a legal regulation that regulates how a person processes civil litigation in front of a court session and how the court processes in accepting, examining, adjudicating and deciding cases and how the process of implementation is in order to maintain the existence of material civil law. Generally, in the enforcement of law and justice, there are several elements, namely: elements of law enforcement, elements of justice seekers, elements of legal instruments (legal / regulatory material), and elements of infrastructure all of which become an integrated unit. The four elements have the same opportunity to be a support and obstacle in the implementation of law enforcement and justice in the field of Shari'ah economy

scholarly journals Jakie przepisy procesowe należy stosować w postępowaniu prowadzonym na podstawie art. 33 ust. 6 ustawy Prawo łowieckie

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Miłosz Kościelniak-Marszał
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Broad Sense ◽  
Civil Action ◽  
Penal Liability ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law

Under art. 33 it. 6 of Hunting law cases of different nature are heard before a regional court. It is the subject matter of specific proceedings that is decisive in determining which procedural regulations will apply as the above provision refers to different legal relations. The first one refers to the membership in the Polish Hunting Association, which is granted in a way that allows us to recognize it as a civil law occurrence, and therefore the request before a common court for the protection of the membership may be considered a civil action. The second one is related to disciplinary liability which due to repressive nature of sanctions falls within penal liability in its broad sense. In this case, the proceedings before a common court exercised as a result of making an appeal against the decision ending disciplinary proceedings within the structures of the Polish Hunting Association constitute continuation of the disciplinary procedure. The nature of this liability calls for the court appeal control to be conducted on the basis of the same rules pertaining to the law of criminal procedure, on which disciplinary proceedings within the organization were based, and for the procedure ensuring the defendant as far-reaching proceedings security as possible to be applied.

scholarly journals Protection of civil property rights in case of recognition of the contract as not concluded

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (20) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
O. A. Surzhenko
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences

The article examines the problems of protecting civil property rights, one of the ways of which is to recognize the transaction as invalid. When analyzing this method of protection, violations by a transaction of the conditions of its action, the legal nature of invalid transactions, individual grounds and legal consequences of their invalidity are considered. Transactions that have certain drawbacks, and therefore do not meet the conditions that make the person’s actions legitimate, closely intersect with other actions that also do not lead to the purpose for which they were committed. These are not concluded contracts. The plane of intersection of these actions is quite significant, and the criteria for their delimitation are not regulated in the law, but in judicial practice are sometimes worked out contradictory. This applies to non-compliance with the requirements for the form of the transaction (in particular, the signature of the person), essential conditions, and other provisions of the law.Protection of civil rights is one of the most important categories of the theory of civil and civil procedural law, without clarification of which it is very difficult to understand the nature and characteristics of civil sanctions, the mechanism of their implementation and other issues arising in connection with the violation of civil rights. It is noted that the originality of regulatory civil law is that it arises from legitimate legal actions and is aimed at satisfying any property need. The force of coercion gives it the ability to be provided with legal measures. The right (entitlement) to protection in regulatory legal relations is one of the transactions of any subjective civil law, according to which the rightholder can, in the event of violation of the right, make a demand for the protection of the violated civil law

scholarly journals E-Court in resolving civil cases - Foreign experiences and recommendations for Vietnam

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. first
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung ◽  
Huynh Thi Nam Hai ◽  
Luu Minh Sang
Keyword(s):  
Social Order ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
State Management ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Procedural Time ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes

Applying digital technology in state management activities is a trend that many countries are actively implementing. Experiences from other foreign countries show that digitizing and technologizing judicial activities is an inevitable trend to simplify administrative procedures, maximize the settlement of disputes to ensure legitimate rights of people, and to maintain social order. Vietnam is therefore not out of that trend. However, the application of information technology to the Court's activities in Vietnam has just been initially organized through a number of activities such as online filing, electronic case management..., but for the online trial, the Vietnamese law still does not have a complete legal framework. In the context of Covid-19 epidemy, the employment of E-court becomes even more necessary than ever. Because of social distancing, many activities, including court trial have been postponed. This can cause many inconveniences to the court (to comply with the law on procedural time), and to the parties (who wants to solve their legal issues as quick as possible, so that they can enjoy well their legal rights and interests). However, this model of court needs many conditions to be developed: investment of Government, qualifications of competent persons, people’s scientific and technical level… It should be noted that technological measures are just a different implementation method of the procedural provisions, but due to being as the procedural law, these implementation steps should be clearly specified in the law, so as not to be considered a violation of the proceedings. Thus, the contents of law need to be legalized such as applicable conditions, procedures on initiating a lawsuit, on giving announcement to parties... In fact and theory, all kind of civil cases can be judged online as long as the requirements of platform and demand of participating parties are met. And the civil procedure law can add regulations about the online method to some of necessary procedural steps as an additional choice to the parties. The article focuses on recommending the building of a E-Court model in Vietnam in civil proceedings, where this model can be effectively applied due to the civil nature of the case, with the research method of analysis, thesis and comparison with other foreign laws, such as Malaysia, Korea, Australia and Canada.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PRINSIP PEMBUKTIAN HUKUM PERDATA FORMIL DALAM ARBITRASE BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 1999

Yuridika ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunti Kalma Syita
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
The Real ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Dispute Resolution Mechanism

In the dispute resolution mechanism both litigation and non-litigation such as arbitrary, proofing evidence process plays essential role to reconstruct the real occurrence in order to seek the truth. Proofing principles that is used in Indonesian arbitrary process is based on the Law number 30 year 1999 on arbitrary and alternative dispute resolution that is lex arbitri for Indonesia. Arbitrary is part of formal civil law, therefore its proofing principles is basically the same with the dispute resolution trough litigation. The Law number 30 year 1999 shows that Even though Indonesia is a civil law jurisdiction, there are some common law principles that are accommodated in the arbitrary process. Using conceptual and statute approach, this article attempts to look at proofing principles may arise in arbitrary mechanism based on the law mentioned and based on the actual practice.Keywords : arbitrary, proofing principles, civil procedural law.

ASAS TERBUKA UNTUK UMUM DAN KEHADIRAN FISIK PARA PIHAK DALAM SIDANG DI PENGADILAN NEGERI PASCA PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-250
Author(s):  
Bernadette M Waluyo
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Basic Principle ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
District Court ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
Law Courts ◽  
Court Proceedings

The Indonesian Supreme Court, in response to the information era, modernizes the civil procedural rules at the district court level.  This is done by issuing Supreme Court Regulation no. 1 of 2019 re. Administration of Justice at Civil Law Courts and Electronic-Court Proceedings. Undoubtedly, modernization of existing rules on the administration of justice is much needed.  On the other hand, these changes may violate a number of procedural civil law principles.  The author argues, from a civil procedural law perspective, that the above Supreme Court regulation violates the basic principle of transparency of court proceedings and physical attendance at court proceedings. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document