scholarly journals Concurrent task performance enhances low-level visuomotor learning

2007 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. P. Roche ◽  
Seán Commins ◽  
Francis Agnew ◽  
Sarah Cassidy ◽  
Kristin Corapi ◽  
...  
SLEEP ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin J. Wamsley ◽  
Karen Perry ◽  
Ina Djonlagic ◽  
Laura Babkes Reaven ◽  
Robert Stickgold

1987 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen C. Moran

Tension (muscle contraction) headache is often associated with high task demands, and relaxation is frequently recommended during daily work activities in many treatment programs. The effect of relaxation on concurrent task performance is assumed to be beneficial, or at worst to have no effect, but this assumption is seldom made explicit. This paper presents results from two experiments which have examined the effects of muscle tension and relaxation on concurrent task performance, in headache-prone and non-headache groups. Results indicated that induced frontalis relaxation did not generally result in optimal task performance; the performance measure affected (accuracy or reaction time) was related to the type of task being performed. Differences between the headache and non-headache subjects were especially related to interactions between task difficulty level and “optimal” level of frontalis tension. Further research is needed to clarify the aspects of performance most affected by variations in frontalis tension and the appropriateness of attempting to relax the frontalis muscle in task situations.


1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude M. Chemtob ◽  
Herbert L. Roitblat ◽  
Roger S. Hamada ◽  
Miles Y. Muraoka ◽  
John G. Carlson ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. McFarland ◽  
Gina Geffen

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 689-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Albinet ◽  
Phillip D. Tomporowski ◽  
Kathryn Beasman

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsie Ong ◽  
Rick Law Tsz Chun

<p>The manuscript is titled ‘Emotional facial processing: does cognitive load make a difference?’ and it describes a research study that measures how emotion and distraction of different cognitive loads may impact working memory performance. The findings show that cognitive load on working memory performance, with poorer working memory performance in the high compared to the low level of distraction. However, no effects of emotional faces were found on task performance. The work therefore has significance with regard to cognitive processing and working memory span.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document