scholarly journals People with Colorectal Cancer in SEER-Medicare: Part D Uptake, Costs, and Outcomes

Author(s):  
Lisa M. Lines ◽  
Florence K. L. Tangka ◽  
Sonja Hoover ◽  
Sujha Subramanian

Limited information exists about enrollment in Part D prescription coverage by Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. Part D coverage may increase access to medicines. This study evaluated patterns of Part D uptake and costs and assessed the effects of coverage on hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) use among people with colorectal cancer (CRC). We analyzed Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare linked data on fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries with at least 36 months of follow-up who were diagnosed with CRC at any point from January 2007 through December 2010, and a matched cohort of beneficiaries without cancer. Dual (Medicare/Medicaid) enrollees were excluded because they are automatically enrolled in Part D. Among beneficiaries with CRC (n=12,774), 39 percent had complete Part D coverage, defined as coverage in the diagnosis year and 2 subsequent years; the rate was 38 percent in the matched comparison cohort (P=.119). Among those with complete Part D coverage, there was no significant difference in annual prescription drug costs between people with CRC ($3,157, 95% confidence interval [CI]: $3,098–$3,216) and without ($3,113, 95% CI: $3,054–$3,172). Among people with CRC, odds of ED use ranged from unchanged to marginally higher for those with no or partial Part D coverage, (adjusted odds ratio: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.00–1.18), compared with those with complete Part D coverage. Lack of continuous Part D coverage was associated with more ED use among Medicare FFS beneficiaries with CRC in 2007–2013. Among people with Part D coverage, prescription drug costs varied little between those with CRC and matched beneficiaries without cancer.

Medical Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy W. Cutler ◽  
Marilyn R. Stebbins ◽  
Amanda R. Smith ◽  
Rajul A. Patel ◽  
Helene L. Lipton

Diabetes Care ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Jeong Choi ◽  
Haomiao Jia ◽  
Tal Gross ◽  
Katie Weinger ◽  
Patricia W. Stone ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 275-275
Author(s):  
Sheetal Mehta Kircher ◽  
Michael Johansen ◽  
Matthew M. Davis

275 Background: Medicare Part D was designed to reduce out of pocket (OOP) costs for Medicare beneficiaries, but the extent to which this occurred for patients with cancer has not been measured. The aim of this study is to quantify the impact of Part D eligibility on OOP cost for prescription drugs and utilization for cancer patients. Methods: Differences-in-differences analyses were used to estimate the effects of Medicare Part D eligibility on OOP drug costs, by comparing 4 year periods before and after Part D implementation. Analyses were based on data from the publicly available Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative, all-payer sample of the United States non-institutionalized civilian population. Our analysis compared per-capita OOP burden between Medicare beneficiaries (age 65+) with cancer to near-elderly individuals age 55-64 years old with cancer. Results: 2,077 near-elderly individuals with cancer and 4,723 individuals with Medicare and cancer were included (total n=6,800), representing over 85 million people. Prescription drug coverage increased among individuals with Medicare from before Part D (39%) to after (65%); in contrast, prescription drug coverage among the near-elderly remained stable before vs. after Part D (82.4% vs. 81.4%). The mean per-capita OOP cost for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer before Part D was $1,111 (SE ±45) and decreased to $694 (±35) after implementation of Medicare Part D—a decline of 37%. Compared with changes in OOP drug costs for non-elderly patients with cancer over the same period, implementation of Medicare Part D was associated with a further reduction of $286 per person. OOP costs for cancer-associated drugs (i.e., antineoplastic, pain medications, anti-emetics) accounted for 6.5-11.1% of the total OOP cost with no significant trends between 2002-2010. Conclusions: The implementation of Medicare D has significantly reduced OOP prescription drug costs for seniors with cancer, beyond trends observed for younger patients. Considering prescription drugs for all medical conditions, cancer associated drugs compose a minority of the cost, highlighting that cancer patients have many comorbid conditions contributing to overall costs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. A171
Author(s):  
MR Stebbins ◽  
RA Patel ◽  
TW Cutler ◽  
AR Smith ◽  
S Shimomura ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 604-609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajul A. Patel ◽  
Kim-Anh Vo ◽  
Tiffany Chu ◽  
Kenneth Wang ◽  
Shu Lu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document