scholarly journals Acupuncture Combined with Pricking-Cupping Therapy for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Protocol of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Hun Guo ◽  
Jun Xiong ◽  
XingChen Zhou
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-533
Author(s):  
Junhyeok Kim ◽  
Min Kyoung Kim ◽  
Geun Joo Choi ◽  
Hwa Yong Shin ◽  
Beom Gyu Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Haiou Zhou ◽  
Zhiguang Wang ◽  
Haifei Jin ◽  
Xing Chen ◽  
Long Lei

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e021070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seoyoun Kim ◽  
Sook-Hyun Lee ◽  
Me-Riong Kim ◽  
Eun-Jung Kim ◽  
Deok-Sang Hwang ◽  
...  

ObjectivesNeck pain is a significant condition that is second only to depression as a cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Thus, identifying and understanding effective treatment modalities for neck pain is of heightened importance. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effects of cupping on neck pain from the current literature.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).SettingNine databases, including Chinese, Korean and Japanese databases, were searched for data up to January 2018 with no restrictions on publication language.ParticipantsPatients with neck pain.InterventionsCupping therapy as the sole or add-on intervention compared with no treatment or active controls.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPain severity, functional disability and quality of life.ResultsEighteen RCTs were selected. Compared with the no intervention group, the cupping group exhibited significant reduction in pain (mean difference (MD) −2.42(95% CI −3.98 to −0.86)) and improvement in function (MD −4.34(95% CI −6.77 to −1.19)). Compared with the active control, the cupping group reported significant reduction in pain (p=0.0009) and significantly improved quality of life (p=0.001). The group that received control treatment with cupping therapy (add-on group) displayed significant pain reduction compared with the active control group (p=0.001). Of the 18 studies, only 8 reported occurrence of adverse events, which were mostly mild and temporary.ConclusionsCupping was found to reduce neck pain in patients compared with no intervention or active control groups, or as an add-on treatment. Depending on the type of control group, cupping was also associated with significant improvement in terms of function and quality of life; however, due to the low quality of evidence of the included studies, definitive conclusions could not be drawn from this review. Future well-designed studies are needed to substantiate the effectiveness of cupping on neck pain.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016047218.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Azizkhani ◽  
Fereshteh Ghorat ◽  
Sayed Mohammad Ali Soroushzadeh ◽  
Mehrdad Karimi ◽  
Saeed Yekaninejad

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 152-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Quan Li ◽  
Wen Guo ◽  
Ze-Gan Sun ◽  
Qing-Song Huang ◽  
En Yeong Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiqi Wu ◽  
Hantong Hu ◽  
Dexiong Han ◽  
Hong Gao

Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common complications of herpes zoster (HZ), and there is still a lack of effective therapies. An increasing number of studies have found that compared to traditional therapy, moxibustion treatment is beneficial for the treatment of PHN, although current evidence remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxibustion for PHN.Methods: We conducted a broad literature review of a range of databases from inception to December 2020, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Clinical Trails, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), China Biomedical Network Information, and Wanfang databases. We included RCTs that compared moxibustion to pharmacological therapies, herbal medicine, or no treatment for treating PHN. The main outcome measure was efficacy rate and Visual Analog Scale (VAS); the secondary outcome measure was adverse events. Data accumulation and synthesis included meta-analysis, publication bias, sensitivity analysis, risk-of-bias assessment, and adverse events.Results: We included 13 RCTs involving 798 patients. Compared with the controls (pharmacological therapies, herbal medicine, or no treatment), moxibustion achieved a significantly higher efficacy rate (odds ratio [OR]: 3.65; 95% [confidence interval]: [2.32, 5.72]; P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis of the distinct moxibustion modalities showed that both Zhuang medicine medicated thread and thunder-fire moxibustions obtained higher clinical efficacy than the control group. Compared with the controls, moxibustion resulted in significantly lower scores on the VAS (Weighted Mean Difference (MD) = −1.79; 95% CI: [−2.26, −1.33]; P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in terms of safety between moxibustion and the controls (OR = 0.33; 95% CI [0.06, 1.77]; P = 0.19).Conclusion: Due to the lack of methodological quality as well as the significant heterogeneity of the included studies, it remains difficult to draw a firm conclusion on the efficacy and safety of moxibustion for the treatment of PHN. Future high-quality studies are urgently needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document