Noise transfer of pump field noise with analysis frequency in a broadband parametric downconversion process

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 052703
Author(s):  
Yajun Wang ◽  
Yuhang Tian ◽  
Xiaocong Sun ◽  
Long Tian ◽  
Yaohui Zheng
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Schneehagen ◽  
Thomas F. Geyer ◽  
Ennes Sarradj ◽  
Danielle J. Moreau

Abstract One known method to reduce vortex shedding from the tip of a blade is the use of end plates or winglets. Although the aerodynamic impact of such end plates has been investigated in the past, no studies exist on the effect of such end plates on the far-field noise. The aeroacoustic noise reduction of three different end-plate geometries is experimentally investigated. The end plates are applied to the free end of a wall-mounted symmetric NACA 0012 airfoil and a cambered NACA 4412 airfoil with an aspect ratio of 2 and natural boundary layer transition. Microphone array measurements are taken in the aeroacoustic open-jet wind tunnel at BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg for chord-based Reynolds numbers between 75,000 and 225,000 and angles of attack from 0$$^\circ$$ ∘ to 30$$^\circ$$ ∘ . The obtained acoustic spectra show a broad frequency hump for the airfoil base configurations at higher angles of attack that is attributed to tip noise. Hot-wire measurements taken for one configuration show that the application of an end plate diffuses the vorticity at the tip. The aeroacoustic noise contribution of the tip can be reduced when the endplates are applied. This reduction is most effective for higher angles of attack, when the tip vortex is the dominant sound source. Graphic abstract


Author(s):  
Clifford A. Brown

Many configurations proposed for the next generation of aircraft rely on the wing or other aircraft surfaces to shield the engine noise from the observers on the ground. However, the ability to predict the shielding effect and any new noise sources that arise from the high-speed jet flow interacting with a hard surface is currently limited. Furthermore, quality experimental data from jets with surfaces nearby suitable for developing and validating noise prediction methods are usually tied to a particular vehicle concept and, therefore, very complicated. The Jet-Surface Interaction Tests are intended to supply a high quality set of data covering a wide range of surface geometries and positions and jet flows to researchers developing aircraft noise prediction tools. The initial goal is to measure the noise of a jet near a simple planar surface while varying the surface length and location in order to: (1) validate noise prediction schemes when the surface is acting only as a jet noise shield and when the jet-surface interaction is creating additional noise, and (2) determine regions of interest for future, more detailed, tests. To meet these objectives, a flat plate was mounted on a two-axis traverse in two distinct configurations: (1) as a shield between the jet and the observer and (2) as a reflecting surface on the opposite side of the jet from the observer. The surface length was varied between 2 and 20 jet diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. Similarly, the radial distance from the jet centerline to the surface face was varied between 1 and 16 jet diameters. Far-field and phased array noise data were acquired at each combination of surface length and radial location using two nozzles operating at jet exit conditions across several flow regimes: subsonic cold, subsonic hot, underexpanded, ideally expanded, and overexpanded supersonic. The far-field noise results, discussed here, show where the jet noise is partially shielded by the surface and where jet-surface interaction noise dominates the low frequency spectrum as a surface extends downstream and approaches the jet plume.


1994 ◽  
Vol 110 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Fleischhauer ◽  
Mikhail D. Lukin ◽  
Dmitri E. Nikonov ◽  
Marlan O. Scully

2017 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 332-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Love ◽  
Andrew Z.P. Smith ◽  
Stephen Watson ◽  
Eleni Oikonomou ◽  
Alex Summerfield ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Schindler ◽  
Dylan J Gorman ◽  
Nikos Daniilidis ◽  
Hartmut Häffner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document