scholarly journals Small Hydropower Development in North-Central of Nigeria: An Assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-16
Author(s):  
M. M. Muhammadu ◽  
J. Usman
2012 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 448-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.M. Taele ◽  
L. Mokhutšoane ◽  
I. Hapazari

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 460-468
Author(s):  
I. A. Kerimov ◽  
M. Ya. Gaysumov ◽  
S.V. Badaev ◽  
A. A. Batukaev

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Jiandong

China developed small hydropower (SHP) with its own resources instead of importing advanced technology from other countries. SHP has been instrumental in rural electrification. In 1997, SHP accounted for 28.6% of whole exploitable hydro energy in China. The peculiarities of SHP of China are:1. Decentralized approach for SHP development with county as basic unit,2. Special policies and strategies adopted- self construction, self management and self consumption- rural hydropower development fund set up - levy of 2 cents of each kWh- electricity generates electricity policy3. Various Channels of investment are mobilizedTo exploit China's experience in SHP the International Network on Small Hydropower (IN-SHP) was established in Hangzhou, China.Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment Issue No. 4, January, 2009 Page 11-14


2021 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 110653
Author(s):  
Lixiao Zhang ◽  
Mingyue Pang ◽  
AbuBakr S. Bahaj ◽  
Yongchuan Yang ◽  
Changbo Wang

Author(s):  
Sergei Vladimirovich Gavriusev ◽  
Timofey Mikhailovich Mazurchuk ◽  
Anna Vadimovna Korenevskaya ◽  
Maxim Vasilyevich Chernyaev ◽  
Yuliana Vladimirovna Solovieva

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1033
Author(s):  
Tokihiko Fujimoto ◽  
Kazuki Kagohashi

This paper aims at clarifying the determinants that promote the community-based renewable energy development in Japan, with a special focus on micro and small hydropower. This paper analyzes a case study of the social enterprise that was established by the local residents and farmers in the Gokase Township, the purpose of which is to install and develop community-based renewable energy. To analyze the case study, we adopt the framework of the Landcare approach. The Landcare approach can be characterized by the following guiding principles: (1) a strong community initiative guided by local residents and primary producers; (2) a focus on local problems; (3) a holistic and integrated approach to tackling problems; (4) stress on community well-being; and (5) partnership and networking. There are similarities between the Gokase Research Institute of Renewable Energy (GRIRE) and Landcare in that they both focus on local issues that can be tackled by local citizens and take a holistic approach that includes not only hydropower development but also improvement in community well-being. This paper examines the fitness of each principle and reveals that all of them fit fairly well with the case of micro-hydropower development in Gokase. This implies that micro-hydropower development in Gokase can be qualitatively evaluated as sustainable from the perspective of Sustainable Development theory.


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan A. McManamay ◽  
Nicole Samu ◽  
Shih-Chieh Kao ◽  
Mark S. Bevelhimer ◽  
Shelaine C. Hetrick

Author(s):  
Chinh Luu ◽  
Jason Von Meding ◽  
Sittimont Kanjanabootra

Purpose One of the main strategic targets in the national power development plan of Vietnam is to give priority to hydropower. However, there is evidence that the most “at risk” in Vietnamese society have, to date, broadly failed to benefit from hydropower development but rather have become more vulnerable. This paper aims to broaden the perspective of decision makers (government agencies, investors and banks) in the hydropower industry regarding the environmental and social impacts of unrestrained development and the critical need to not only reduce disaster risk for communities but also provide a sustainable model for Vietnam’s energy demand. Design/methodology/approach This position paper presents a critique of public policy in Vietnam related to hydropower industry, undertaken alongside an analysis of socio-economic community resilience and disaster risk reduction literature. Findings Small hydropower investment must be delayed until measures are put in place to ensure that multi-stakeholder risk is a central component of the investment dialogue. Current pricing policies are not aligned with the hydropower development management, and this erects barriers to environmentally and socially conscious decision-making. Practical implications This paper suggests that the development of small hydropower projects must be curtailed until new measures are put in place. This has practical implications for investors, policy makers and residents of affected areas. The authors argue for a significant shift in government strategy toward building resilience as opposed to growth and profit at any cost. Social implications Conscious of Vietnam’s energy demands and development goals, this paper investigates the context of increasing disaster risk and ecological pressures, as well as social injustice relating to the hydropower industry. This kind of analysis can support future efforts to reduce disaster risk and the vulnerability of marginalized groups in Vietnam. Originality/value The authors present a comprehensive review of Vietnamese hydropower from a disaster resilience perspective and provide analysis that will be useful in further research in this emerging area.


2016 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 380-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacson Hudson Inácio Ferreira ◽  
José Roberto Camacho ◽  
Juliana Almansa Malagoli ◽  
Sebastião Camargo Guimarães Júnior

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document