scholarly journals Single‐Step Genomic and Pedigree Genotype × Environment Interaction Models for Predicting Wheat Lines in International Environments

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulino Pérez‐Rodríguez ◽  
José Crossa ◽  
Jessica Rutkoski ◽  
Jesse Poland ◽  
Ravi Singh ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mekliche ◽  
F. Dahlia ◽  
L. Hanifi-Mekliche

This study focuses on the genetic potential and genotypic stability of 17 durum wheat genotypes during three crop years under wet conditions in the north of Algeria (Algiers). The results showed highly significant (P<0.001) agro-morphological diversity between the genotypes and a genotype × environment interaction for all the traits except for fertile spikelet number. Wricke’s ecovalance (wi), Shukla's stability variance (σi2), heterogeneity variance (%HV) and the incomplete correlation (%IC) method were used to analyse the genotype × environment interaction on grain yield. The genotypes Ardente/Waha L2, Ardente and Saadi/Simeto L3 exhibited great instability with the highest values of wi, σi2, %HV and %IC. Ardente/Waha L1, Simeto/Vitron L5, Simeto and Ardente/Vitron L1 had the highest grain yield and average stability (wi, %HV and %IC were weak). Significant correlations were found between %HV, Rij2, bi, wi, σi2 and %IC, implying that they were similarly efficient in detecting stable genotypes and in measuring stability.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xiong ◽  
Matthew Reynolds ◽  
Jose Crossa ◽  
Thomas Payne ◽  
Urs Schulthess ◽  
...  

Abstract The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) develops and distributes annually elite wheat lines as international trials worldwide to assess their performance in different environments and utilization by partners for use in breeding or release as varieties. However, as elsewhere, the collaborator test sites where trials are evaluated have experienced climate change, with implications for how adapted wheat genotypes are bred. Using a standard quantitative genetic model and archived datasets for four global spring wheat trials, we show that the genotype-environment-interaction (GEI) has increased by up to 500% over recent decades. Notably crossover has increased over time, a critical indicator of changes in the ranking of cultivar performance in different environments. Climatic factors explain over 70% of the year-to-year variability in GEI and crossover interactions for yield. Examining yield responses of all genotypes in all trial environments from 1985 to 2017 reveals that climate change has increased GEI by ~ 49% and ranking change by ~38%. Genetic improvement of wheat targeted to high-yielding environments has exacerbated this increase, but the performance of new wheat germplasm developed to withstand heat and drought stress is more adapted and stable, offsetting the increase in ranking changes due to the warmer climate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-106
Author(s):  
Dipendra Regmi ◽  
Mukti Ram Poudel ◽  
Bishwas K.C. ◽  
Padam Bahadur Poudel

Wheat is the principal winter crop in Nepal. Drought affects 44% of the lands of the total wheat area in the country with a yield loss of 15–20%. This research focuses to minimize this loss through the identification of high-yielding lines stable across the drought stress and irrigated environments. The experiment was conducted in Alpha Lattice Design with 20 genotypes replicated twice with five blocks per replication from November 2019 to April 2020. The findings showed that genotypes, environments, and genotype-environment interaction have a highly significant effect on grain yield and explained 28.95%, 52.57%, and 18.47% of variation on yield, respectively. The which-won-where model revealed elite line NL 1420 is the most responsive line in the drought environment, followed by BL 4407, while elite line NL 1179 is the most stable line in irrigated environment. The mean vs stability model with principal component 1 and 2 explaining 65.76% and 34.24% respectively, showed that elite line NL 1420, BL 4407, BL 4919, Bhrikuti are both high yielding and stable lines while line NL 1179, Gautam, and NL 1384 are less stable in both test environments. Similarly, the ranking genotypes model indicated lines close to the ideal line are NL 1420, BL 4407, BL 4919, Bhrikuti as the most representative line for genotype evaluation. Thus, elite wheat line NL 1420 and NL 1179 are recommended as specifically adapted to drought and irrigated environments, respectively, and elite line NL 1420, BL 4407, BL 4919, Bhrikuti are recommended for further evaluation for stability. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. Vol 9(2): 98-106


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3039-3047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Italo Granato ◽  
Jaime Cuevas ◽  
Francisco Luna-Vázquez ◽  
Jose Crossa ◽  
Osval Montesinos-López ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Batra ◽  
W. R. Usborne ◽  
D. G. Grieve ◽  
E. B. Burnside

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
Irina Manukyan ◽  
◽  
Madina Basieva ◽  
Elena Miroshnikova ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document