scholarly journals Treatment of Gingival Recession Class II Defect using Buccal Fat Pad versus Platelet Rich Fibrin using Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access Technique

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (D) ◽  
pp. 126-132
Author(s):  
Aya Kamal ◽  
Ahmed Abdel Meguid Moustafa ◽  
Ahmed Abdallah Khalil
Keyword(s):  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Buccal Fat Pad ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

ABSTRACTAim of study: The aim of this study was to Compare the effectiveness of Non-pedicled buccal fat pad versus Platelet rich fibrin in treatment of Miller class II gingival recession using vistubular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access TechniquePatients and methods:This study was conducted on 40 patients with class II gingival recession in anterior or premolar segment. The entire patients were selected from the out patient clinic of the Oral Medicine, Oral Diagnosis, and Periodontology Department. Faculty of Dentistry, Minya University.Forty patients with gingival recession class II were divided randomly into two groups:Group I: (20 defect) using VISTA technique with Non- pedicled buccal fat pad (NPBFP), Group II: (20 defect) using VISTA technique with platelet rich fibrin (PRF).Results: In both groups all clinical parameters were statistically significant from pre-operative period till 6 months follow up period. In the comparison between the two groups after 6 months follow up period, there were no statistically significant difference between two groups regarding all clinical parameters except percentage of root coverage; there was significant increase in percentage of root coverage after 3 and 6 months follow up period in group II with p value was less than 0.05.Conclusion: Both PRF membrane and NPBFP are effective in the management of Class II gingival recession defects using VISTA technique. PRF group has better results regarding percentage of root coverage than NPBPF group after 3 and 6 months follow up.

scholarly journals Root coverage with buccal fat pad placed on restored cervical abrasion: Case report with three-year follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Sagrika Shukla ◽  
HarpreetSingh Grover ◽  
Ashi Chug ◽  
Kuldeep Singh
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Buccal Fat Pad

scholarly journals Non-Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad Grafts to Treatment for Class I and II Gingival Recessions: A Clinical Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Miranda Deliberador ◽  
Claudia Tenório Trevisani ◽  
Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer ◽  
Felipe Rychuv Santos ◽  
João César Zielak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class I ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Buccal Fat Pad ◽  
Gingival Margin ◽  
Level Width ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Probing Depth ◽  
Postoperative Time

The aim of this study was to analyze the transplant efficiency of non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) for the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions (GRs) and to compare these results with those of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG), which is considered the gold standard. Twelve patients with Miller Class I or II (≥2 mm) bilateral recessions in maxillary premolars or canines were selected. Recessions were randomly assigned to receive SCTG or BFPG. The clinical parameters evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively included gingival index, plaque index, probing depth, GR, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, thickness of keratinized tissue and gingival margin to the acrylic guide. None of the evaluated clinical parameters differed significantly between the groups. At all evaluated postoperative time-points, both groups exhibited statistically significant differences in GR and gingival margin to the acrylic guide compared to baseline. Six months after surgery, the mean percentages of root coverage were 67.5% and 87.5% in the BFPG and SCTG groups respectively. In both groups, complete root coverage was observed in 50% of cases 6 months after surgery. The results presented herein indicate that the use of BFPG transplant has clinical similarities with SCTG and both may be considered as clinically successful methods for treating Miller Class I and II GRs.

Use of Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad in Root Coverage of Severe Gingival Recession Defect

2008 ◽  
Vol 79 (7) ◽  
pp. 1271-1279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally A. El Haddad ◽  
Mona Y. Abd El Razzak ◽  
Mohammad El Shall
Keyword(s):  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Buccal Fat Pad

scholarly journals Patient-centered evaluation of microsurgical management of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap with platelet-rich fibrin or amnion membrane: A comparative analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit Kumar Agarwal ◽  
Rajesh Jhingran ◽  
Vivek Kumar Bains ◽  
Ruchi Srivastava ◽  
Rohit Madan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Platelet Rich Fibrin ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Coronally Advanced Flap ◽  
Group I ◽  
Microsurgical Approach ◽  
Amnion Membrane ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Experimental Group

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedure under microsurgical approach for the management of Miller's Class I and II gingival recession defects with the use of either platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) or amnion membrane (AM) in comparison to CAF alone. Materials and Methods: A total of 45 sites with Miller's Class I or II gingival recession defect were randomly distributed for: Experimental Group I (CAF with PRF) sites (n = 15) which were treated with the microsurgical approach using CAF along with PRF; experimental Group II (CAF with AM) sites (n = 15) were treated with the microsurgical approach using CAF along with AM; control Group III (CAF alone) sites (n = 15) were treated with the microsurgical approach using CAF alone. Vertical gingival recession (VGR), horizontal gingival recession (HGR), gingival thickness (GT) (using transgingival probing [TGP] and ultrasonography [USG]) and patients’ response and acceptance were documented at baseline, 3 months and 6 months after surgical interventions. Results: CAF alone and in combination with PRF or AM, were effective techniques for root coverage with average VGR values of 1.47 ± 0.92 mm (56%), 0.67 ± 1.23 mm (36%) and 0.60 ± 1.06 mm (33%) in Group I (CAF with PRF), Group II (CAF with AM), and Group III (CAF alone), respectively. Complete coverage (100%) was obtained in 33.3% sites of Group I (CAF with PRF), 26.6% sites of Group II (CAF with AM) and 13.3% in Group III (CAF alone). Patients’ response and acceptance for surgical treatment modality in terms of patient esthetic score and decrease in hypersensitivity score was highest for Group I (CAF with PRF), whereas patient comfort score was highest for Group II (CAF with AM). At 6 months follow-up, significant increase in GT measurements (using TGP and USG) in Group I (CAF with PRF), whereas, nonsignificant increase for Group II (CAF with AM) and no change or decrease for Group III (CAF alone) as compared to baseline was observed. Conclusion: The present study observed enhancement in root coverage when PRF or AM are used in conjunction with CAF as compared to CAF alone. These results are based on 6-month followup. Therefore, the long-term evaluation may be necessary to appreciate the clinical effect of autologous PRF and AM.

scholarly journals Evaluation of root coverage with pedicled buccal fat pad in class III and class IV gingival recession defects

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1656
Author(s):  
K Monika ◽  
Lokesh Sunkala ◽  
N Sandeep ◽  
K Keerthi ◽  
BVimal Bharathi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Buccal Fat Pad ◽  
Class Iv

scholarly journals Pedicled buccal fat pad graft for root coverage in severe gingival recession defect

2015 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saurav Panda ◽  
Massimo Del Fabbro ◽  
Anurag Satpathy ◽  
AbhayaChandra Das
Keyword(s):  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Buccal Fat Pad

scholarly journals Versatility of the pedicled buccal fat pad flap for the management of oroantral fistula: a retrospective study of 25 cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinyoung Park ◽  
Byung-do Chun ◽  
Uk-Kyu Kim ◽  
Na-Rae Choi ◽  
Hong-Seok Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Fistula Closure ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Buccal Fat Pad ◽  
Dental Surgery ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Maxillary Bone ◽  
Oroantral Fistula

Abstract Purpose Maxillary bone grafts and implantations have increased over recent years despite a lack of maxillary bone quality and quantity. The number of patients referred for oroantral fistula (OAF) due to implant or bone graft failure has increased, and in patients with an oroantral fistula, the pedicled buccal fat pad is viewed as a robust, reliable option. This study was conducted to document the usefulness of buccal fat pad grafts for oroantral fistula closure. Materials and methods We retrospectively studied 25 patients with OAF treated with a buccal fat pad graft from 2015 to 2018. Sex, age, OAF location, cause, duration, presence of systemic disease, smoking, previous dental surgery, and side effects were investigated. Results A total of 25 patients were studied. Mean patient age was 54.8 years, and the male to female ratio was 19:6. Causes of oroantral fistula were cyst enucleation, tumor resection, implant removal, bone graft failure, and extraction. Excellent results were obtained in 23 (92%) of the 25 patients. In the other two patients that both smoked, a small fistula was observed during follow-up. No recurrence of oroantral fistula was observed after 2 months to 1 year of follow-up. Conclusions The incidence of oroantral fistula is increasing due to implant and bone graft failures. Oroantral fistula closure using a pedicled buccal fat pad was found to have a high success rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document