scholarly journals PPARγ potentiates anticancer effects of gemcitabine on human pancreatic cancer cells

Author(s):  
Hironori Koga
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 824-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander Bekeschus ◽  
André Käding ◽  
Tim Schröder ◽  
Kristian Wende ◽  
Christine Hackbarth ◽  
...  

Background: Cold physical plasma has been suggested as a new anticancer tool recently. However, direct use of plasma is limited to visible tumors and in some clinical situations, is not feasible. This includes repetitive treatment of peritoneal metastases, which commonly occur in advanced gastrointestinal cancer and in pancreatic cancer in particular. In case of diffuse intraperitoneal metastatic spread, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Intraoperative Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used as a therapeutic approach. Plasma-treated solutions may combine non-toxic characteristics with the anticancer effects of HIPEC. Previous work has provided evidence for an anticancer efficacy of plasma-treated cell culture medium but the clinical relevance of such an approach is low due to its complex formulation and lack of medical accreditation. Objective: Plasma-treated Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS), which closely resembles medically certified solutions, was investigated for its cytotoxic effect on 2D monolayer murine pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Methods: Toxicity studies of primary murine fibroblasts, PDA6606 murine pancreatic cancer cells, and COLO 357 human pancreatic cancer cells exposed to plasma-treated PBS were performed. Results: Plasma-treated PBS significantly decreased cancer cell metabolisms and proliferation whereas plasma-treated Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium had no effect. Moreover, tumor cell growth attenuation was significantly higher when compared to syngeneic primary murine fibroblasts. Both results were confirmed in a human pancreatic cancer cell line. Finally, plasma-treated PBS also decreased the size of pancreatic tumors in a three-dimensional manner, and induction of apoptosis was found to be responsible for all anticancer effects identified. Conclusion: Plasma-treated PBS inhibited cell growth in 2D and 3D models of cancer. These results may help facilitate the development of new plasma-derived anticancer agent with clinical relevance in the future.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Mi Lee ◽  
Gil-Woo Lee ◽  
Seon-Young Park ◽  
Hosouk Joung ◽  
Chang-Hwan Park ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Silibinin is a flavonoid with antihepatotoxic properties, and exhibits pleiotropic anticancer effects. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for its anticancer actions in pancreatic cancer cells, and the effects on such cells and normal pancreatic cells, remain unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of silibinin on human pancreatic cancer cells and normal ductal cells.Methods Human pancreatic cancer cells (MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1) and normal ductal cells (hTERT-HPNE) were cultured with 0–400 μM silibinin for 48 h. Thereafter, the proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and signaling pathways of the pancreatic cells were evaluated.Results Silibinin significantly inhibited the proliferation, invasion, and spheroid formation of human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05). It also induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Western blot analysis showed that silibinin downregulated extracellular signaling-regulated kinase (ERK) and serine/threonine protein kinase (AKT) in human pancreatic cancer cells. It also upregulated microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 β (LC3B) and cleaved caspase-3 via c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) signaling. On the other hand, silibinin increased the mRNA and protein levels of c-Jun, Twist-related protein 1, and Snail. It also decreased exogenous p53 levels, but increased endogenous c-Jun protein levels in human pancreatic cancer cells. However, silibinin did not affect cell viability and endogenous c-Jun levels in pancreatic normal ductal cells. It increased exogenous p53 levels, but decreased stemness-related gene expression in pancreatic normal ductal cells. Silibinin increased Ki-67 levels in pancreatic cancer cells, but decreased them in pancreatic normal ductal cells.Conclusion Silibinin not only exerted anticancer effects by inhibiting AKT–ERK and JNK signaling, but also upregulated cancer stemness–related genes in human pancreatic cancer cells. These results suggest that silibinin should be used as a therapeutic agent for human pancreatic cancer with caution.


Author(s):  
Hironori Koga ◽  
Karuppaiyah Selvendiran ◽  
Ramadoss Sivakumar ◽  
Takafumi Yoshida ◽  
Takuji Torimura ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Su-Mi L ◽  
◽  
Gil-Woo L ◽  
Seon-Young P ◽  
Hosouk J ◽  
...  

Objective: Silibinin is a flavonoid with antihepatotoxic properties, and exhibits pleiotropic anticancer effects. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for its anticancer actions in pancreatic cancer cells, and the effects on such cells and normal pancreatic cells, remain unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of silibinin on human pancreatic cancer cells and normal ductal cells. Methods: Human pancreatic cancer cells (MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1) and normal ductal cells (hTERT-HPNE) were cultured with 0-400 μM silibinin for 48 h. Thereafter, the proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and signaling pathways of the pancreatic cells were evaluated. Results: Silibinin significantly inhibited the proliferation, invasion, and spheroid formation of human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro in a dosedependent manner (p<0.05). It also induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Western blot analysis showed that silibinin downregulated extracellular signaling-regulated kinase (ERK) and serine/threonine protein kinase (AKT) in human pancreatic cancer cells. It also upregulated microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3 β (LC3B) and cleaved caspase-3 via c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) signaling. On the other hand, silibinin increased the mRNA and protein levels of c-Jun, Twist-related protein 1, and Snail. It also decreased exogenous p53 levels, but increased endogenous c-Jun protein levels in human pancreatic cancer cells. However, silibinin did not affect cell viability and endogenous c-Jun levels in pancreatic normal ductal cells. It increased exogenous p53 levels, but decreased stemness-related gene expression in pancreatic normal ductal cells. Silibinin increased Ki-67 levels in pancreatic cancer cells, but decreased them in pancreatic normal ductal cells. Conclusion: Silibinin not only exerted anticancer effects by inhibiting AKTERK and JNK signaling, but also upregulated cancer stemness-related genes in human pancreatic cancer cells. These results suggest that silibinin should be used as a therapeutic agent for human pancreatic cancer with caution.


2010 ◽  
Vol 999 (999) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
P. Ulivi ◽  
C. Arienti ◽  
W. Zoli ◽  
M. Scarsella ◽  
S. Carloni ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2017
Author(s):  
Lital Sharvit ◽  
Rinat Bar-Shalom ◽  
Naiel Azzam ◽  
Yaniv Yechiel ◽  
Solomon Wasser ◽  
...  

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with limited options for effective therapy and the lowest survival rate of all cancer forms. Therefore, a new, effective strategy for cancer treatment is in need. Previously, we found that a culture liquid extract of Cyathus striatus (CS) has a potent antitumor activity. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of Cyathus striatus extract (CSE) on the growth of pancreatic cancer cells, both in vitro and in vivo. The proliferation assay (XTT), cell cycle analysis, Annexin/PI staining and TUNEL assay confirmed the inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptosis by CSE. A Western blot analysis demonstrated the involvement of both the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis pathways. In addition, a RNAseq analysis revealed the involvement of the MAPK and P53 signaling pathways and pointed toward endoplasmic reticulum stress induced apoptosis. The anticancer activity of the CSE was also demonstrated in mice harboring pancreatic cancer cell line-derived tumor xenografts when CSE was given for 5 weeks by weekly IV injections. Our findings suggest that CSE could potentially be useful as a new strategy for treating pancreatic cancer.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 249
Author(s):  
Ruediger Goess ◽  
Ayse Ceren Mutgan ◽  
Umut Çalışan ◽  
Yusuf Ceyhun Erdoğan ◽  
Lei Ren ◽  
...  

Background: Pancreatic cancer‐associated diabetes mellitus (PC‐DM) is present in most patients with pancreatic cancer, but its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to characterize tumor infiltration in Langerhans islets in pancreatic cancer and determine its clinical relevance. Methods: Langerhans islet invasion was systematically analyzed in 68 patientswith pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using histopathological examination and 3D in vitro migration assays were performed to assess chemoattraction of pancreatic cancer cells to isletcells. Results: Langerhans islet invasion was present in all patients. We found four different patterns of islet invasion: (Type I) peri‐insular invasion with tumor cells directly touching the boundary, but not penetrating the islet; (Type II) endo‐insular invasion with tumor cells inside the round islet; (Type III) distorted islet structure with complete loss of the round islet morphology; and (Type IV)adjacent cancer and islet cells with solitary islet cells encountered adjacent to cancer cells. Pancreatic cancer cells did not exhibit any chemoattraction to islet cells in 3D assays in vitro. Further, there was no clinical correlation of islet invasion using the novel Islet Invasion Severity Score (IISS), which includes all invasion patterns with the occurrence of diabetes mellitus. However, Type IV islet invasion was related to worsened overall survival in our cohort. Conclusions: We systematically analyzed, for the first time, islet invasion in human pancreatic cancer. Four different main patterns of islet invasion were identified. Diabetes mellitus was not related to islet invasion. However, moreresearch on this prevailing feature of pancreatic cancer is needed to better understand underlying principles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 2053-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji‐Hua Lin ◽  
Sheng‐Yi Chen ◽  
Chi‐Cheng Lu ◽  
Jer‐An Lin ◽  
Gow‐Chin Yen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document