Damage and Progression on Radiographs in Individual Joints: Data from Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trials

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 2018-2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT B.M. LANDEWÉ ◽  
VIBEKE STRAND ◽  
PHILIP G. CONAGHAN ◽  
DÉSIRÉE van der HEIJDE

Objective.Radiographic progression is usually assessed by Sharp-based methods (van der Heijde-modified Sharp score and the Genant-modified Sharp score). The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a range of randomized controlled trials (RCT), the presence of erosions and joint space narrowing (JSN) in all individual joints, as well as progression in these joints, and to determine if any redundancy exists due to infrequently involved joints.Methods.Four databases of rheumatoid arthritis RCT that were all scored according to van der Heijde’s modification of the Sharp score were included in a descriptive analysis.Results.Irrespective of different readers, different patient populations, and different disease durations per trial, similar patterns emerged. Both erosions and JSN occurred in all sites. Erosions occurred most frequently in the feet, preferentially in 5th metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP-5). JSN occurred most frequently in the wrist. Change from baseline in erosions and JSN followed the pattern of involvement at baseline, so that MTP-5, and to a lesser extent MTP-3 and MTP-4, preferentially showed progression in erosive damage. Joints in the wrist showed highest tendency to worsen over time with respect to JSN.Conclusion.These data indicate that both erosions and JSN must be assessed for damage, and that a more abbreviated joint count cannot be used for radiographic scoring.

PAIN Reports ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e819
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Postier ◽  
Christine Chambers ◽  
David Watson ◽  
Craig Schulz ◽  
Stefan J. Friedrichsdorf

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Malattia ◽  
◽  
Nicolino Ruperto ◽  
Silvia Pederzoli ◽  
Elena Palmisani ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Few clinical trials have investigated the prevention of radiographic progression in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with antirheumatic drugs. This study aimed to investigate radiographic progression in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA) treated with the anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab for 2 years in the TENDER and CHERISH randomized controlled trials, respectively. Methods Standard radiographs of both wrists and both hands in the posteroanterior view were obtained within 4 weeks of baseline and were repeated at weeks 52 ± 4 and 104 ± 4 in both trials. All films were scored by two independent readers using the adapted Sharp–van der Heijde (aSH) and Poznanski scoring methods. Although the Poznanski score indicates bone growth limitation or cartilage growth decrease, which are not the same as joint space narrowing in rheumatoid arthritis, its change reflects damage to cartilage. Therefore, impairment in the Poznanski score as well as the aSH score was considered as a measure of structural joint damage. Radiographic progression was defined as worsening of radiographic scores beyond the smallest detectable difference. Results Poznanski and aSH scores were available at baseline and at one or more postbaseline time points for 33 and 47 of 112 sJIA patients and 61 and 87 of 188 pcJIA patients, respectively, providing a representative subset of the study populations. The inter-reader and intra-reader agreement intra-class correlation coefficient was > 0.8. Median baseline Poznanski and aSH scores, respectively, were − 2.4 and 24.6 for sJIA patients and − 1.5 and 8.0 for pcJIA patients. Compared with baseline, aSH scores remained stable for all sJIA patients at week 52, whereas 9.4% of sJIA patients had radiographic progression according to Poznanski scores at week 52; at 104 weeks, radiographic progression according to aSH and Poznanski scores was observed in 5.4% and 11.5%, respectively. In pcJIA patients, radiographic progression from baseline at 52 weeks and at 104 weeks was 12.5% and 2.9%, respectively, using aSH scoring and 6.5% and 4%, respectively, using Poznanski scoring. Conclusion Tocilizumab may delay radiographic progression in children with sJIA and children with pcJIA. Trial registration Trial registration numbers and dates: TENDER, NCT00642460 (March 19, 2008); CHERISH, NCT00988221 (October 1, 2009)


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1095.2-1095
Author(s):  
F. Maatoug ◽  
M. Slouma ◽  
R. Dhahri ◽  
O. Beskri ◽  
I. Gharsallah ◽  
...  

Background:The tight control strategy is recommended in rheumatoid arthritis to tailor treatment for patients. This strategy requires regular monitoring of both disease activity and structural damage. However, radiographic assessement cannot be performed frequently and the modified Sharp score is rarely evaluated in current practice. Besides, no biomarker was able to mirror structural damage (1).Objectives:Our study aimed to assess the relationship between the modified Sharp score and the inflammatory ratios (platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) and CRP to albumin ratio (CAR)).Methods:We performed a cross-sectional study including 53 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A cell blood count, fibrinogen and an albumin blood test were measured for each patient. Inflammatory ratios were also measured (PLR, NLR, LMR, FAR, and CAR). Modified Sharp score and its components (erosion score and joint space narrowing score) were evaluated using the radiograph of hand and foot.Patients with infectious or hematological diseases were excluded from the study.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences).Results:Of the 53 patients, 39 were female (Sex Ratio: 2.8). The mean age was 53.9 ± 12.7 years. The mean disease duration was 10.1 ± 8.2 years.The average age of the onset of the disease was 43.8±13.5 years.The mean DAS 28-ESR score was 4.64 ± 1.23. Forty three patients had a score higher than 3.2 (patients with moderate or high disease activity).The mean values of PLR, NLR, LMR, FAR and CAR were 161.62 ± 86.59, 2.84 ± 2.39, 4.99 ± 3.23, 0.12 ± 0.06 and 1.15 ± 1.38.The mean scores of joint erosion and joint space narrowing were respectively 12.76 ± 15.05 and 33.57 ± 25.80. The mean modified Sharp score was 46.33 ± 37.74.There was a positive correlation between modified Sharp score and following ratios: PLR (r: 0.501; p <10-3), NLR (r: 0.302; p:0.031), FAR (r: 0.300; p:0.030), CAR (r:0.286; p:0.042).Moreover, a positive correlation between joint space narrowing score and these ratios was identified: PLR (r: 0.558; p <10-3), NLR (r: 0.428; p:0.002), FAR (r: 0.371; p:0.007), CAR (r:0.387; p:0.005).Joint erosion score correlated with PLR (r: 0.299; p:0.033).No correlation was found between LMR and radiographic score.Conclusion:Our study showed that the modified Sharp score correlated with PLR, NLR, FAR and CAR in patients with RA. This finding suggests that these ratios could be used as inexpensive and reliable markers to reflect radiographic joint damage.Longitudinal studies are necessary to confirm our results.References:[1]Syversen SW, Landewe R, Van Der Heijde D, Bathon JM, Boers M, Bykerk VP, et al. Testing of the OMERACT 8 draft validation criteria for a soluble biomarker reflecting structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature search on 5 candidate biomarkers. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(8):1769-84.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Author(s):  
Mingfu Ye ◽  
Wenjun Liu ◽  
Shaolong Cheng ◽  
Lihui Yan

Clinicians treating overdenture patients need to know if immediate loading and conventional loading results in similar outcomes. This study aimed to perform a systematic literature search of studies comparing immediate and conventional loading of mandibular overdentures irrespective of the number of implants and conduct a meta-analysis of implant failure and marginal bone loss (MBL). A literature search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Ovoid, Springer, and Google Scholar databases was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate vs conventional loading of mandibular overdentures. The primary outcome was implant failure and the secondary outcome was marginal bine loss (MBL). A descriptive analysis was performed for other outcomes. Thirteen trials were included. Only one trial compared the immediate and delayed loading of single implant-supported overdenture. Seven trials used two implants, one trial used three implants while four trials used four implants. Meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in implant failure and MBL between immediate and conventional loading of two-implant and four-implant supported overdentures. Descriptive analysis indicated no difference in peri-implant tissue indices, implant stability, and quality of life outcomes between the two loading protocols.There may be no difference in implant failure and MBL with immediate loading or conventional loading of two and four-implant supported mandibular overdentures. Literature review indicates that there may be no difference in peri-implant tissue indices, implant stability, and QoL outcomes between the two loading protocols. The overall quality of evidence is moderate. Further, adequately powered RCTs are required to strengthen the evidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document