scholarly journals Integrated topic modeling and sentiment analysis: a review rating prediction approach for recommender systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anbazhagan MAHADEVAN ◽  
Michael AROCK
Author(s):  
Fouzi Harrag ◽  
Abdulmalik Salman Al-Salman ◽  
Alaa Alquahtani

Recommender systems nowadays are playing an important role in the delivery of services and information to users. Sentiment analysis (also known as opinion mining) is the process of determining the attitude of textual opinions, whether they are positive, negative or neutral. Data sparsity is representing a big issue for recommender systems because of the insufficiency of user rating or absence of data about users or items. This research proposed a hybrid approach combining sentiment analysis and recommender systems to tackle the problem of data sparsity problems by predicting the rating of products from users’ reviews using text mining and NLP techniques. This research focuses especially on Arabic reviews, where the model is evaluated using Opinion Corpus for Arabic (OCA) dataset. Our system was efficient, and it showed a good accuracy of nearly 85% in predicting the rating from reviews.


Author(s):  
Sardar Haider Waseem Ilyas ◽  
Zainab Tariq Soomro ◽  
Ahmed Anwar ◽  
Hamza Shahzad ◽  
Ussama Yaqub

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-456
Author(s):  
James R Rogers ◽  
Hollis Mills ◽  
Lisa V Grossman ◽  
Andrew Goldstein ◽  
Chunhua Weng

Abstract Scientific commentaries are expected to play an important role in evidence appraisal, but it is unknown whether this expectation has been fulfilled. This study aims to better understand the role of scientific commentary in evidence appraisal. We queried PubMed for all clinical research articles with accompanying comments and extracted corresponding metadata. Five percent of clinical research studies (N = 130 629) received postpublication comments (N = 171 556), resulting in 178 882 comment–article pairings, with 90% published in the same journal. We obtained 5197 full-text comments for topic modeling and exploratory sentiment analysis. Topics were generally disease specific with only a few topics relevant to the appraisal of studies, which were highly prevalent in letters. Of a random sample of 518 full-text comments, 67% had a supportive tone. Based on our results, published commentary, with the exception of letters, most often highlight or endorse previous publications rather than serve as a prominent mechanism for critical appraisal.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimon Ohtani

Abstract The importance of biodiversity conservation is gradually being recognized worldwide, and 2020 was the final year of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets formulated at the 10th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP10) in 2010. Unfortunately, the majority of the targets were assessed as unachievable. While it is essential to measure public awareness of biodiversity when setting the post-2020 targets, it is also a difficult task to propose a method to do so. This study provides a diachronic exploration of the discourse on “biodiversity” from 2010 to 2020, using Twitter posts, in combination with sentiment analysis and topic modeling, which are commonly used in data science. Through the aggregation and comparison of n-grams, the visualization of eight types of emotional tendencies using the NRC emotion lexicon, the construction of topic models using Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), and the qualitative analysis of tweet texts based on these models, I was able to classify and analyze unstructured tweets in a meaningful way. The results revealed the evolution of words used with “biodiversity” on Twitter over the past decade, the emotional tendencies behind the contexts in which “biodiversity” has been used, and the approximate content of tweet texts that have constituted topics with distinctive characteristics. While the search for people's awareness through SNS analysis still has many limitations, it is undeniable that important suggestions can be obtained. In order to further refine the research method, it will be essential to improve the skills of analysts and accumulate research examples as well as to advance data science.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Rodrigues ◽  
Antonio Jacob Junior ◽  
Fábio Lobato

Posts with defamatory content or hate speech are constantly foundon social media. The results for readers are numerous, not restrictedonly to the psychological impact, but also to the growth of thissocial phenomenon. With the General Law on the Protection ofPersonal Data and the Marco Civil da Internet, service providersbecame responsible for the content in their platforms. Consideringthe importance of this issue, this paper aims to analyze the contentpublished (news and comments) on the G1 News Portal with techniquesbased on data visualization and Natural Language Processing,such as sentiment analysis and topic modeling. The results showthat even with most of the comments being neutral or negative andclassified or not as hate speech, the majority of them were acceptedby the users.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document