Biomechanical Study of 4-hole Pubic Symphyseal Plating: Locked Versus Unlocked Constructs

Orthopedics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. e1028-e1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. Prasarn ◽  
Greg Zych ◽  
Greg Gaski ◽  
Dinah Baria ◽  
David Kaimrajh ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul ◽  
Fanny Schwaabe ◽  
Manuel Kistler ◽  
Clara Gennen ◽  
Sebastian Andreß ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Open book fractures are challenging injuries oftentimes requiring surgical treatment. The current treatment of choice is symphyseal plating, which requires extensive surgery and entirely limits physiological movement of the symphyseal joint, frequently resulting in implant failure. Therefore, we investigated the biomechanical properties of a semi-rigid implant (modified SpeedBridge™) as a minimally invasive tape suture construct for the treatment of open book fractures and evaluated the superiority of two techniques of implementation: criss-cross vs. triangle technique. Materials and methods Nine synthetic symphyseal joints were dissected creating an open book fracture. The different osteosynthesis methods (plating, modified SpeedBridge™ in criss-cross/triangle technique) were then applied. All constructs underwent horizontal and vertical loading, simulating biomechanical forces while sitting, standing and walking. For statistical analysis, dislocation (mm) and stiffness (N/mm) were calculated. Results Symphyseal plating for the treatment of open book fractures proved to be a rigid osteosynthesis significantly limiting the physiological mobility of the symphyseal joint (dislocation: 0.08 ± 0.01 mm) compared to the tape sutures (dislocation: triangle technique 0.27 ± 0.07 mm, criss-cross technique 0.23 ± 0.05 mm) regarding horizontal tension (p < 0.01). Both modified SpeedBridge™ techniques showed sufficient biomechanical stability without one being superior to the other (p > 0.05 in all directions). Considering vertical loading, no statistical difference was found between all osteosynthesis methods (caudal: p = 0.41; cranial: p = 0.61). Conclusions Symphyseal plating proved to be the osteosynthesis method with the highest rigidity. The modified SpeedBridge™ as a semi-rigid suture construct provided statistically sufficient biomechanical stability while maintaining a minimum of symphyseal movement, consequently allowing ligamental healing of the injured joint without iatrogenic arthrodesis. Furthermore, both the criss-cross and the triangle technique displayed significant biomechanical stability without one method being superior.


2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao Nishiwaki ◽  
Mark Welsh ◽  
Louis Ferreira ◽  
James Johnson ◽  
Graham King ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Houguang Liu ◽  
Gang Cheng ◽  
Jianhua Yang ◽  
Zhihong Cheng ◽  
Zhushi Rao ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (02) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong ◽  
Mark E. Easley ◽  
Richard R. Glisson

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 974-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armin Badre ◽  
David T. Axford ◽  
Sara Banayan ◽  
James A. Johnson ◽  
Graham J.W. King

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 102-110
Author(s):  
Stacy Fan ◽  
Clare Padmore ◽  
Assaf Kadar ◽  
Spencer Chambers ◽  
G. Daniel G. Langohr ◽  
...  

Arthroplasty ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni Wendler ◽  
Torsten Prietzel ◽  
Robert Möbius ◽  
Jean-Pierre Fischer ◽  
Andreas Roth ◽  
...  

Abstract Background All current total hip arthroplasty (THA) systems are modular in design. Only during the operation femoral head and stem get connected by a Morse taper junction. The junction is realized by hammer blows from the surgeon. Decisive for the junction strength is the maximum force acting once in the direction of the neck axis, which is mainly influenced by the applied impulse and surrounding soft tissues. This leads to large differences in assembly forces between the surgeries. This study aimed to quantify the assembly forces of different surgeons under influence of surrounding soft tissue. Methods First, a measuring system, consisting of a prosthesis and a hammer, was developed. Both components are equipped with a piezoelectric force sensor. Initially, in situ experiments on human cadavers were carried out using this system in order to determine the actual assembly forces and to characterize the influence of human soft tissues. Afterwards, an in vitro model in the form of an artificial femur (Sawbones Europe AB, Malmo, Sweden) with implanted measuring stem embedded in gelatine was developed. The gelatine mixture was chosen in such a way that assembly forces applied to the model corresponded to those in situ. A study involving 31 surgeons was carried out on the aforementioned in vitro model, in which the assembly forces were determined. Results A model was developed, with the influence of human soft tissues being taken into account. The assembly forces measured on the in vitro model were, on average, 2037.2 N ± 724.9 N, ranging from 822.5 N to 3835.2 N. The comparison among the surgeons showed no significant differences in sex (P = 0.09), work experience (P = 0.71) and number of THAs performed per year (P = 0.69). Conclusions All measured assembly forces were below 4 kN, which is recommended in the literature. This could lead to increased corrosion following fretting in the head-neck interface. In addition, there was a very wide range of assembly forces among the surgeons, although other influencing factors such as different implant sizes or materials were not taken into account. To ensure optimal assembly force, the impaction should be standardized, e.g., by using an appropriate surgical instrument.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document