Reproducibility of Femoral Offset Following Short Stem and Straight Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Because of preservation of proximal femoral bone stock and minimized soft tissue trauma, short-stem implants are becoming increasingly important in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The postulated advantage regarding the functional outcome has not been verified. We hypothesized an increased abductor muscle strength by the use of a short-stem design. Seventy consecutive patients of a randomized clinical trial were included. Of these, 67 patients met the inclusion criteria after 12 months. Thirty-five patients received a standard straight stem and 32 patients a short-stem femoral component. All surgeries were performed by a modified direct lateral approach. Isometric muscle strength of the hip abductors was evaluated preoperatively 3 and 12 months after surgery. Harris hip score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were evaluated. After three months, there were no differences between the two groups; the abductor force was comparable to the preoperative initial values. After 12 months, a significant increase in muscle strength for the short stem patient group compared to preoperative baseline values was measured (straight-stem THA, 0.09 Nm/kg ± 0.4, p = 0.32; short-stem THA, 0.2 Nm/kg ± 0.3, p = 0.004). Comparison of the 12-month postoperative total HHS and WOMAC revealed no significant differences between both groups. A significant increase in hip abductor muscle strength 12 months after short-stem THA compared to conventional-stem THA was observed.

Download Full-text

Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an earlier return to work compared to a straight-stem design

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-82805-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Georg Hauer ◽

Maria Smolle ◽

Sabrina Zaussinger ◽

Joerg Friesenbichler ◽

Andreas Leithner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Sick Leave ◽

Return To Work ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Short Stem ◽

Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis ◽

Stem Design ◽

Total Hip ◽

Straight Stem ◽

Significant Difference

AbstractReturn to work (RTW) has been specifically identified as a high priority in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). This investigation sought to assess the effect of the stem design on patients’ RTW. Secondly, the study aimed to identify risk factors that lead to a delayed RTW. Questionnaires inquiring about RTW, employment history, educational level, type of work, physical demands and joint awareness were administered by post. Further data were collected from patients’ hospital records. 176 patients who underwent THA using a short-stem and 97 patients using a straight-stem design were compared. The median return to work time was 10 weeks [IQR 7–14 weeks], with no significant difference between the two groups (short stems vs. straight stems; 10 [IQR 7–14] vs. 11 [7.5–13.5] weeks; p = 0.693). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, self-employment vs. employee (p = 0.001), dimension of preoperative workload (p = 0.001), preoperative sick leave (p < 0.001), and hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.001) independently affected the period until work was resumed. The Forgotten-Joint-Score-12 showed no significant difference between the two groups. The data show that the majority of THA patients can expect to resume work and stem design has no impact on RTW. Employees with preoperative sick leave, prolonged hospital LOS and low workload are at higher risk for a delayed RTW.

Download Full-text

The Accuracy and Ability of Preoperative Templating to Restore Femoral Offset in Calcar-Guided Short-Stem Total Hip Prosthesis through Direct Anterior Approach

The Journal of Hip Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0041-1729867 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Barbara Favier ◽

Nathalie van Beek ◽

Mike Tengrootenhuysen

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Anterior Approach ◽

Direct Anterior Approach ◽

Short Stem ◽

Size Difference ◽

Femoral Offset ◽

Stem Size ◽

Total Hip ◽

Preoperative Templating

AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the applicability and ability of preoperative templating to restore femoral offset and hip length with a calcar-guided short-stem implant design in total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach. Preoperative measurements were performed of femoral offset, hip length, and stem size and compared with the perioperative placed prosthesis in 100 patients undergoing primary total hip replacement through direct anterior approach. Additionally, the pre- and postoperative femoral offset and hip length were compared to evaluate the ability to restore the offset and hip length with this kind of femoral short stem. With an acceptance of 1 size difference pre- and postoperatively, a 94% accuracy of predicting the size of the calcar-guided short stem was achieved with templating. Femoral offset was within means of 5 mm in 82.2% of the patients. Postoperative hip length was within 6 mm in 90% of the patients compared with the preoperative length.The use of preoperative templating for total hip arthroplasty with calcar-guided short-stem implants was proven to be a useful tool to predict the definite implanted size of the femoral prosthesis. Our results show that this new stem design does not significantly differ from previous reported outcomes with other stem designs and is competent to restore the femoral offset and hip length within clinical acceptable range. Level of evidence Level 3 retrospective case study.

Download Full-text

The Influence of Hip Rotation on Femoral Offset Following Short Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Journal of Arthroplasty ◽

10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.027 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 31 (1) ◽

pp. 312-316 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Christoph K. Boese ◽

Jan Bredow ◽

Max Ettinger ◽

Peer Eysel ◽

Fritz Thorey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Short Stem ◽

Femoral Offset ◽

Total Hip ◽

Hip Rotation

Download Full-text

Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between an Anatomic Short Stem and a Straight Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Journal of Arthroplasty ◽

10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.016 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 32 (2) ◽

pp. 594-600 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Gaku Koyano ◽

Tetsuya Jinno ◽

Daisuke Koga ◽

Yuki Yamauchi ◽

Takeshi Muneta ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Bone Remodeling ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Short Stem ◽

Total Hip ◽

Straight Stem

Download Full-text

Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Biplanar Weightbearing Radiographs

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2019/1932191 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-7 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Y. Knafo ◽

F. Houfani ◽

B. Zaharia ◽

F. Egrise ◽

I. Clerc-Urmès ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Preoperative Planning ◽

Femoral Stem ◽

Leg Length ◽

Femoral Offset ◽

Postoperative Result ◽

Total Hip ◽

Planning Software ◽

Navigated Surgery

Two-dimensional (2D) planning on standard radiographs for total hip arthroplasty may not be sufficiently accurate to predict implant sizing or restore leg length and femoral offset, whereas 3D planning avoids magnification and projection errors. Furthermore, weightbearing measures are not available with computed tomography (CT) and leg length and offset are rarely checked postoperatively using any imaging modality. Navigation can usually achieve a surgical plan precisely, but the choice of that plan remains key, which is best guided by preoperative planning. The study objectives were therefore to (1) evaluate the accuracy of stem/cup size prediction using dedicated 3D planning software based on biplanar radiographic imaging under weightbearing and (2) compare the preplanned leg length and femoral offset with the postoperative result. This single-centre, single-surgeon prospective study consisted of a cohort of 33 patients operated on over 24 months. The routine clinical workflow consisted of preoperative biplanar weightbearing imaging, 3D surgical planning, navigated surgery to execute the plan, and postoperative biplanar imaging to verify the radiological outcomes in 3D weightbearing. 3D planning was performed with the dedicated hipEOS® planning software to determine stem and cup size and position, plus 3D anatomical and functional parameters, in particular variations in leg length and femoral offset. Component size planning accuracy was 94% (31/33) within one size for the femoral stem and 100% (33/33) within one size for the acetabular cup. There were no significant differences between planned versus implanted femoral stem size or planned versus measured changes in leg length or offset. Cup size did differ significantly, tending towards implanting one size larger when there was a difference. Biplanar radiographs plus hipEOS planning software showed good reliability for predicting implant size, leg length, and femoral offset and postoperatively provided a check on the navigated surgery. Compared to previous studies, the predictive results were better than 2D planning on conventional radiography and equal to 3D planning on CT images, with lower radiation dose, and in the weightbearing position.

Download Full-text

The impact of reducing the femoral stem length in total hip arthroplasty during gait

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery ◽

10.1007/s00402-021-03852-w ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Anatole Vilhelm Wiik ◽

Adeel Aqil ◽

Bilal Al-Obaidi ◽

Mads Brevadt ◽

Justin Peter Cobb

Keyword(s):

Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Gait Analysis ◽

Hip Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Stem ◽

Short Stem ◽

Stem Length ◽

Practical Consideration ◽

Total Hip ◽

Long Stem ◽

The Impact

Abstract Aim The length of the femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a practical consideration to prevent gait impairment. The aim of this study was to determine if reducing the femoral stem length in THA would lead to impaired gait biomechanics. Methods Patients uniformly with the same brand implant of differing lengths (100 mm vs 140–166 mm) were taken retrospectively from a prospective trial introducing a new short stem. Twelve patients without any other disorder to alter gait besides contralateral differing length stem THA were tested at differing gradients and speed on a validated instrumented treadmill measuring ground reaction forces. An anthropometrically similar group of healthy controls were analysed to compare. Results With the same posterior surgical approach, the offset and length of both hips were reconstructed within 5 mm of each other with an identical mean head size of 36 mm. The short stem was the last procedure for all the hips with gait analysis occurring at a mean of 31 and 79 months postoperatively for the short and long stem THA, respectively. Gait analysis between limbs of both stem lengths demonstrated no statistical difference during any walking condition. In the 90 gait assessments with three loading variables, the short stem was the favoured side 51% of the time compared 49% for the long stem. Conclusion By testing a range of practical walking activities, no lower limb loading differences can be observed by reducing the femoral stem length. A shorter stem demonstrates equivalence in preference during gait when compared to a reputable conventional stem in total hip arthroplasty.

Download Full-text