Abstract
Background and aim
Scaffold design and plaque characteristics influence implantation outcomes and local flow dynamics in treated coronary segments. Our aim is to assess the impact of strut embedment/protrusion of bioresorbable scaffold on local shear stress distribution in different atherosclerotic plaque types.
Method
Fifteen Absorb everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds were implanted in human epicardial coronary arteries. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed post-scaffold implantation and strut embedment/protrusion were analyzed using a dedicated software. OCT data was fused with angiography to reconstruct three-dimensional coronary anatomy. Blood flow simulation was performed and wall shear stress (WSS) was estimated in each scaffolded surface and the relationship between strut embedment/protrusion and WSS was evaluated.
Results
There were 9083 struts analysed. Ninety-seven percent of the struts (n=8840) were well apposed and 243 (3%) were malapposed. At cross-section level (n=1289), strut embedment was significantly increased in fibroatheromatous plaques (76±48μm) and decreased in fibro-calcific plaques (35±52 μm). Compatible with strut embedment, WSS was significantly higher in lipid-rich fibroatheromatous plaques (1.50±0.81Pa), whereas significantly decreased in fibro-calcified plaques (1.05±0.91Pa). After categorization of WSS as low (<1.0 Pa) and normal/high WSS (≥1.0 Pa), the percent of low-WSS in the plaque subgroups were 30.1%, 31.1%, 25.4% and 36.2% for non-diseased vessel wall, fibrous plaque, fibro-atheromatous plaque and fibro-calcific plaque, respectively (p-overall<0.001).
Table 1. Cross-section level Embedment/Protrusion and WSS according to the plaque type Plaque type Embedment depth (μm) Protrusion distance (μm) WSS (Pa) Non-atherosclerotic intimal thickening/normal vessel wall (n=2275) 47±34*Δ¥ 123±34¶Ξπ 1.44±0.9解 Fibrous (n=4191) 53±40*#& 118±38¶Ψ‡ 1.24±0.78αθ∞ Fibroatheromatous (n=2027) 76±48#ΦΔ 94.6±46Ω†Ψπ 1.50±0.81Σ§α Fibro-calcific (n=590) 35±52&Φ¥ 139±50‡†Ξ 1.05±0.91∞£Σ For embedment: *p=0.09, #p<0.001, &p<0.001, Φp<0.0001, Δp<0.0001, ¥p<0.0001. For protrusion: ¶p=0.74, Ξp<0.0001, πp<0.0001, Ψp<0.0001, ‡p<0.0001, †p<0.0001. For WSS: θp<0.001, §p=0.06, £p<0.0001, αp<0.0001, ∞p<0.0001, Ωp<0.0001. n=total strut number in each plaque type, p-values come from mixed-effects regression analysis.
Conclusion
The composition of the underlying plaque influences strut embedment which seems to have effect on WSS. The struts deeply embedded in lipid-rich fibroatheromas plaques resulted in higher WSS compared to the other plaque types.
Modeling Bed Shear Stress Distribution in Rectangular Channels Using the Entropic Parameter
