Applying First-Principle Prediction Tools in Naval Ship Design

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
B J van Oers ◽  
◽  
D Stapersma ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ship Design ◽  
First Principle ◽  
Prediction Tools ◽  
Naval Ship

The Naval Ship Design/Production Interface

1986 ◽  
Vol 2 (03) ◽  
pp. 185-195
Author(s):  
B. F. Tibbitts ◽  
P. A. Gale
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Ship Design ◽  
Design Activity ◽  
Naval Ship ◽  
Current Design ◽  
Design Production ◽  
Design And Production

The paper discusses, from a ship designer's perspective, some of the current topics and issues relating to the interface between naval ship design and production. The current environment within which naval ship design activity is taking place is described. Notable current views on Navy ship design and how it might be improved are summarized. Navy design topics pertinent to improving ship producibility, operability, maintainability and survivability are discussed and examples from recent ship designs are. presented. Issues which result from apparent conflicts in current design initiatives and critiques of the Navy ship design process are highlighted and discussed. Finally, some general conclusions are drawn.

Leading a Sea Change in Naval Ship Design: Toward Collaborative Product Development

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Keane ◽  
Howard Fireman ◽  
Daniel W. Billingsley
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
Process Improvement ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Ship Design ◽  
Naval Research ◽  
Total Quality ◽  
Collaborative Product Development ◽  
Development Environment ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Naval Ship

In October 1989, the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) conducted the Ship Design for Producibility Workshop with broad participation from the Navy, Shipbuilders, Ship Design Agents and Academia. The Workshop was one of NAVSEA’s first Total Quality Leadership (TQL) initiatives and was subsequently expanded by NAVSEA’s Chief Engineer (CHENG) and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (DASN) for Ships into the Ship Design, Acquisition, and Construction (DAC) Process Improvement Project. In addition, the National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP) initiated a number of thrusts in Concurrent Engineering and Increased Throughput. The authors describe one of these major process improvement initiatives, NAVSEA’s 3D “Product Model” Strategy to extend throughout the enterprise-wide process of warship development a primary focus on the bridge between ship design and shipbuilding. The Workshop and subsequent process improvement initiatives have had a profound impact on the Naval Ship Design Process. Yet, as reported to Congress in 2002 by the Secretary of the Navy, the unbudgeted cost growth and increased cycle times for Detail Design of new warships have “reached an untenable level”. This necessitated the October 2004 ASN (RDA) policy memorandum on Integrated Digital Data Environment (IDDE). To realize transformational innovations in our ship designs, as well as transformational innovations in the entire warship development process, the National Naval Responsibility in Naval Engineering (NNR-NE) was recently established by the Navy. To support NNR-NE the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) created the Center for Innovation in Ship Design (CISD). A summary of some recent CISD Innovation Cells and how CISD can contribute to breaking down the existing organizational cultures and institutionalizing a collaborative product development environment are also discussed. As we begin a new century, it is appropriate that our naval ship design and shipbuilding community review its progress, look at the cross-cut principles of leading change, determine what it takes to bring about dramatic cultural transformation, and discuss the critical need for Navy, Shipbuilder, Design Agent and Academia leadership to continue developing a new collaborative product development environment which fosters a sea change in the whole naval ship development process.

scholarly journals A Pioneer of Naval Ship Design

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-473
Author(s):  
David Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Ship Design ◽  
Naval Ship

Naval Ship Design Philosophy Implementation

1998 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Whitcomb
Keyword(s):  
Ship Design ◽  
Design Philosophy ◽  
Naval Ship

“DESIGN TO COST”-A VIABLE CONCEPT IN NAVAL SHIP DESIGN

1976 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
CLARK GRAHAM ◽  
MICHAEL NICKELSBURG
Keyword(s):  
Ship Design ◽  
Naval Ship

Systems Engineering in Naval Ship Design

2000 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. N. Calvano ◽  
O. Jons ◽  
R. G. Keane
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Ship Design ◽  
Naval Ship

scholarly journals A Method for Selecting Affordable System Concepts: A Case Application to Naval Ship Design

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 304-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Schaffner ◽  
Adam M. Ross ◽  
Donna H. Rhodes
Keyword(s):  
Ship Design ◽  
Naval Ship ◽  
Case Application

COMMENTS ON DR. LEOPOLD'S PAPER: “INNOVATION ADOPTION IN NAVAL SHIP DESIGN”

1978 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 87-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
LASKAR WECHSLER
Keyword(s):  
Innovation Adoption ◽  
Ship Design ◽  
Naval Ship

Human Factors Engineering Technology Integration into the Naval Ship Acquisition Process: Designing for Operability

1978 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-207
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Malone ◽  
David Eike ◽  
Cliff Baker ◽  
Phillip J. Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Ship Design ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Human Factors Engineering ◽  
Engineering Technology ◽  
Acquisition Process ◽  
Preliminary Model ◽  
Naval Ship ◽  
Navy Personnel ◽  
Subordinate Role

Traditionally, Naval ship design programs have placed Human Factors Engineering (HFE) in a subordinate role to ship manning, a process primarily concerned with determining the ship's complement. As a result, HFE inputs to ship design documentation are often scattered, uncoordinated and lacking in fundamental standardization. The Naval Sea Systems Command has recently initiated an effort to correct these problems through a program designed to integrate HFE technologies into the ship planning and acquisition process. One of the primary objectives of this project is the development of an HFE Design Guide to assist Navy personnel in applying HFE technologies early in the design phase of the ship acquisition process. The paper describes the current status and philosophy of this program, and evaluates an attempt to apply a preliminary model of the Guide to Naval recovery systems presently in the development stages: the Mark-14 Arresting Gear System and the Beartrap Recovery Assist, Secure and Traverse System.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document