A Structural Econometric Analysis of Network Formation Games Through Subnetworks

Econometrica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1829-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyang Sheng

The objective of this paper is to identify and estimate network formation models using observed data on network structure. We characterize network formation as a simultaneous‐move game, where the utility from forming a link depends on the structure of the network, thereby generating strategic interactions between links. With the prevalence of multiple equilibria, the parameters are not necessarily point identified. We leave the equilibrium selection unrestricted and propose a partial identification approach. We derive bounds on the probability of observing a subnetwork, where a subnetwork is the restriction of a network to a subset of the individuals. Unlike the standard bounds as in Ciliberto and Tamer (2009), these subnetwork bounds are computationally tractable in large networks provided we consider small subnetworks. We provide Monte Carlo evidence that bounds from small subnetworks are informative in large networks.


Games ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Britta Hoyer ◽  
Stephanie Rosenkranz

Theoretical models on network formation focus mostly on the stability and efficiency of equilibria, but they cannot deliver an understanding of why specific equilibrium networks are selected or whether they are all actually reachable from any starting network. To study factors affecting equilibrium selection, we designed a network formation experiment with multiple equilibria, which can be categorized in terms of the demand on players’ farsightedness and robustness to errors. In a second scenario, we increase the need for farsighted behavior by players, as well as the perceived riskiness of equilibria by adding a stage in which the network is disrupted. This setting allows us to analyze the interplay between the need for farsightedness and perceived risk of errors and its effect on network formation and equilibrium selection.



2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1325-1347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Leung

Counterfactual policy evaluation often requires computation of game‐theoretic equilibria. We provide new algorithms for computing pure‐strategy Nash equilibria of games on networks with finite action spaces. The algorithms exploit the fact that many agents may be endowed with types such that a particular action is a dominant strategy. These agents can be used to partition the network into smaller subgames whose equilibrium sets may be more feasible to compute. We provide bounds on the complexity of our algorithms for models obeying certain restrictions on the strength of strategic interactions. These restrictions are analogous to the assumption in the widely used linear‐in‐means model of social interactions that the magnitude of the endogenous peer effect is bounded below one. For these models, our algorithms have complexity O p ( n c ), where the randomness is with respect to the data‐generating process, n is the number of agents, and c depends on the strength of strategic interactions. We also provide algorithms for computing pairwise stable and directed Nash stable networks in network formation games.



2005 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 295-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
VICTOR AGUIRREGABIRIA ◽  
PEDRO MIRA

This paper presents a hybrid genetic algorithm to obtain maximum likelihood estimates of parameters in structural econometric models with multiple equilibria. The algorithm combines a pseudo maximum likelihood (PML) procedure with a genetic algorithm (GA). The GA searches globally over the large space of possible combinations of multiple equilibria in the data. The PML procedure avoids the computation of all the equilibria associated with every trial value of the structural parameters.



2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 1449-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Montiel Olea ◽  
Tomasz Strzalecki

Abstract This article provides an axiomatic characterization of quasi-hyperbolic discounting and a more general class of semi-hyperbolic preferences. We impose consistency restrictions directly on the intertemporal trade-offs by relying on what we call “annuity compensations.” Our axiomatization leads naturally to an experimental design that disentangles discounting from the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. In a pilot experiment we use the partial identification approach to estimate bounds for the distributions of discount factors in the subject pool. Consistent with previous studies, we find evidence for both present and future bias.



2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 334-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Bellemare ◽  
Luc Bissonnette ◽  
Sabine Kröger


2018 ◽  
Vol 717 ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Christos Kaklamanis ◽  
Panagiotis Kanellopoulos ◽  
Sophia Tsokana


2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 2528-2542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walid Saad ◽  
Zhu Han ◽  
Tamer Basar ◽  
Merouane Debbah ◽  
Are Hjorungnes


Author(s):  
Aureo de Paula ◽  
Seth Richards-Shubik ◽  
Elie T. Tamer


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document