Safety of Flash Glucose Monitoring System using Free Style Libre Pro® in Patients with Diabetes in the Clinic

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Hokuto MOROHOSHI ◽  
Keiko TSUNODA ◽  
Kakei RYU ◽  
Hanami MACHINO ◽  
Takehiko SAMBE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring System ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring System

Functional or non-function pancreatic NET; Novel use of a flash glucose monitoring system

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fahad Arshad ◽  
Ahmed Iqbal ◽  
Jonathan Bury ◽  
Jonathan Wadsley ◽  
Alia Munir
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring System ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Pancreatic Net ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring System

966-P: The Long-Term Impact of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Glycemic Control

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 966-P
Author(s):  
ATSUSHI FUJIYA ◽  
TOSHIKI KIYOSE ◽  
TAIGA SHIBATA ◽  
HIROSHI SOBAJIMA
Keyword(s):  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Long Term Impact ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring System

scholarly journals The Influence of Skin Thickness on Flash Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy in Dogs with Diabetes Mellitus

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 408
Author(s):  
Francesca Del Baldo ◽  
Alessia Diana ◽  
Claudia Canton ◽  
Nikolina Linta ◽  
Roberto Chiocchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monitoring System ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Skin Thickness ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Thin Skin ◽  
Clinical Accuracy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Diabetic Dogs ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring System

A flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) has been validated for use in diabetic dogs. However, it is unknown whether skin thickness affects FGMS measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FGMS accuracy is affected by skin thickness. Fourteen client-owned diabetic dogs on insulin treatment were prospectively enrolled in the study. The dogs were divided into two groups according to their ultrasound-measured skin thickness: dogs with skin thickness < 5 mm (Group 1) and dogs with skin thickness > 5 mm (Group 2). On days 1, 7 and 14, glucose curves were obtained simultaneously using the FGMS and a validated portable blood glucose meter. Paired measurements were used to calculate the mean bias and to determine accuracy according to ISO 15197:2013 criteria. The mean bias was significantly inversely correlated (p = 0.02; r = −0.6) with the mean skin thickness. Clinical accuracy was observed only in Group 2, with 99% of the results in zone A + B of the Parkes consensus error grid analysis. In conclusion, skin thickness seems to affect FGMS measurements, and the device is accurate in dogs with thicker skin (>5 mm); in dogs with thin skin (<5 mm), the clinical accuracy is low, and the results should be interpreted with caution.

Contact dermatitis from MiaoMiao (an add‐on transmitter to FreeStyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María‐Elena Gatica‐Ortega ◽  
María‐Antonia Pastor‐Nieto ◽  
Rafaela Torres‐Aranda ◽  
Loreto Luna‐Bastante ◽  
Cristina Pérez‐Hortet
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring System
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document