Functional or non-function pancreatic NET; Novel use of a flash glucose monitoring system

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fahad Arshad ◽  
Ahmed Iqbal ◽  
Jonathan Bury ◽  
Jonathan Wadsley ◽  
Alia Munir
Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 966-P
Author(s):  
ATSUSHI FUJIYA ◽  
TOSHIKI KIYOSE ◽  
TAIGA SHIBATA ◽  
HIROSHI SOBAJIMA

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 408
Author(s):  
Francesca Del Baldo ◽  
Alessia Diana ◽  
Claudia Canton ◽  
Nikolina Linta ◽  
Roberto Chiocchetti ◽  
...  

A flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) has been validated for use in diabetic dogs. However, it is unknown whether skin thickness affects FGMS measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FGMS accuracy is affected by skin thickness. Fourteen client-owned diabetic dogs on insulin treatment were prospectively enrolled in the study. The dogs were divided into two groups according to their ultrasound-measured skin thickness: dogs with skin thickness < 5 mm (Group 1) and dogs with skin thickness > 5 mm (Group 2). On days 1, 7 and 14, glucose curves were obtained simultaneously using the FGMS and a validated portable blood glucose meter. Paired measurements were used to calculate the mean bias and to determine accuracy according to ISO 15197:2013 criteria. The mean bias was significantly inversely correlated (p = 0.02; r = −0.6) with the mean skin thickness. Clinical accuracy was observed only in Group 2, with 99% of the results in zone A + B of the Parkes consensus error grid analysis. In conclusion, skin thickness seems to affect FGMS measurements, and the device is accurate in dogs with thicker skin (>5 mm); in dogs with thin skin (<5 mm), the clinical accuracy is low, and the results should be interpreted with caution.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María‐Elena Gatica‐Ortega ◽  
María‐Antonia Pastor‐Nieto ◽  
Rafaela Torres‐Aranda ◽  
Loreto Luna‐Bastante ◽  
Cristina Pérez‐Hortet

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalila Costa ◽  
Joana Lourenço ◽  
Ana Margarida Monteiro ◽  
Beatriz Castro ◽  
Patricia Oliveira ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1098612X2096501
Author(s):  
Adam M Shoelson ◽  
Orla M Mahony ◽  
Michelle Pavlick

Objectives Glucose monitoring is an integral part of diabetes management. Interstitial glucose monitoring systems are increasingly commonly being used for this purpose in dogs and cats, including the use of a flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS). The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and nature of complications associated with the use of an FGMS in diabetic cats. Methods The medical records of all cats that had placement of a 14-day FGMS during a 1-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Data retrieved included the number of days the sensor remained attached and functional, location of sensor placement and complications associated with the sensor. Complications were defined as early sensor detachment, sensor failure prior to the end of the 14-day monitoring period and dermatologic changes at the sensor site. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the data. Results Twenty cats had a total of 33 FGMSs placed. The majority (30/33 [91%]) of sensors were placed over the dorsolateral aspect of the thorax just caudal to the scapula. Twenty (61%) FGMSs remained attached and functional for the full 14 days. The overall incidence of complications associated with FGMS use was 10/33 (30%). The most frequent complication was early sensor detachment (n = 5/33 [15%]). Mild dermatologic changes (erythema, crusts) were noted with 4/33 (12%) FGMSs. More serious complications (skin erosions, abscess formation) were noted with 2/33 (6%) FGMSs. Conclusions and relevance The use of the FGMS is relatively safe in cats, although there are potential complications that owners should be made aware of.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document