Authentic Assessment as a Tool to Enhance Student Learning in a Higher Education Institution

Author(s):  
Abatihun Alehegn Sewagegn ◽  
Boitumelo Molebogeng Diale

Authentic assessment plays a great role in enhancing students' learning and makes them competent in their study area. Studies indicate that assessment is authentic when the tasks have real-life value and students perform real-world tasks. Therefore, this chapter shows how lecturers practice authentic assessment to enhance students' learning in a higher education institution. To achieve this, the authors used a phenomenological qualitative research design. An interview was used to collect data. The result indicated that lecturers are highly dependent upon traditional assessment methods, which have no significant contribution to the competency of students. The practice of authentic assessment methods as a tool to enhance students' learning is limited. Therefore, the authors can conclude that enhancing students' learning using authentic assessment in their study areas is untenable if the lecturers continue to utilize their current assessment practices.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vira Vyshyvanyuk ◽  
Nadiya Skrobach ◽  
Oksana Shapoval ◽  
Vitalii Petryna ◽  
Dmytro Solomchak

The importance and prospects for developing a model of teacher’s readiness for educational work with students at higher education institutions are determined by social factors such as: firstly, the educational influence of both the teacher and educational institution on the formation of the student’s personality, his/her initiative, creative approach to the organization of the teaching and educational process; secondly, the use of collective forms of educational activity where pedagogical education and the students’ independent activity are organically combined; thirdly, the development and improvement of the teacher’s educational activity, especially its organizational and communicative components. The developed model of teacher’s readiness for educational work is a system subordinated to certain tasks of methodological work which simultaneously allows teacher to successfully increase his/her readiness for educational work at the particular higher education institution. The model itself is a specific form of reflection, which contains information about the object. A characteristic feature of such models is their simplicity in comparison with the original or real-life situation which is modelled.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Abambres

This work reports several issues found by the author throughout his professional career, concerning academic leadership. Topics like (i) out-of-field teaching/researching, and (ii) time management in faculty hiring or new role assignment, are addressed. Besides, the author describes which fundamental decisions he´d take if he could manage a higher education institution or academic department. The topics covered are crucial for the success of any higher education institution, such as (a) hiring, (b) social engagement, (c) student assessment, (d) open mindedness, (e) prompt communication, (f) passion in work, and (g) freedom / trust.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 56-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Lyalyuk ◽  
O. R. Tuchina

Educational system is the most important social institution, which provides the development of a personality and frames his/her worldview and the conception of subjective well-being. Despite the large number of studies on the issue of psychological and pedagogical security of educational environment, the sphere of higher education still remains underexplored. The available empiric material has not received sufficient methodological justification and conceptualization. This article aims to provide the conceptualization of the risk category as applied to the educational environment of a higher education institution, as well as empiric investigation of the risks within the educational environment as viewed by applicants and students.Materials and methods. 213 applicants and 547 students of the Kuban State Technological University took part in the survey. The following investigation methods were used: expert assessment, interview, questioning, content analysis, analysis of means method, cluster analysis and factor analysis.Investigation results. Comparative examination of the manifestation degree of risks within the educational environment as viewed by applicants and students of higher education institution showed significant differences in the assessment of risk by these groups of respondents. From the point of view of applicants, the main risks are connected with social and psychological aspects of the educational environment of a higher education institution, relations within student groups and interaction with teachers, as well as with the issues related to the educational management and leisure arrangement. As viewed by the students, the risks within the educational environment include external and social and psychological risk factors, motivating risks and risks arising from the learning process organization and management and the related issues. Applicants’ notion of the risks within the educational environment of a higher education institution was mainly influenced by information they received from media and by the opinion of their relatives and age mates.Consideration and conclusions. It was proved that the applicants’ idea of the risks within the educational environment of a higher education institution is determined by the opinion of people they know personally, however it changes during the process of studying in higher education institution and acquiring their own experience of being within the environment. The investigation results allow creating a model of psychological and pedagogical security within the educational environment of a higher education institution. This model makes it possible to forecast main risks of the educational environment, their development, and evolvement and find solution to them. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document