Numerical Investigation of Stainless Steel Welded I-Sections Subjected to Lateral-Torsional Buckling

2016 ◽  
Vol 853 ◽  
pp. 317-321
Author(s):  
Mohammad Anwar-Us-Saadat ◽  
Mahmud Ashraf ◽  
Shameem Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Rational Design ◽  
Slenderness Ratio ◽  
Numerical Results ◽  
Maintenance Cost ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Structural Members ◽  
Lateral Torsional Buckling ◽  
Torsional Buckling ◽  
Cross Sectional

Stainless steel is now widely used in construction as structural members in recognition to its unique beneficial properties such as corrosion resistance, higher strength and ductility, andnegligible maintenance cost. Recent research on stainless steel has seen development of rational design rules to predict cross-sectional resistances but still lacks in appropriate knowledge at the member level. The current paper investigates the lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) behaviour of welded stainless steel I sections. Available test results were used to develop and validate nonlinear finite element (FE) models. Limited experimental evidences were supplemented by a large number of reliable numerical results covering wider range of member slenderness ratio. All test and numerical results were used to investigate the performance of Eurocode EN-1993-1-4 and Australian code AS/NZS 4673 in predicting member resistances against lateral-torsional buckling.

Lateral-torsional buckling of girders with class 4 web: Investigation of coupled instability in EC3-based design approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 2442-2457
Author(s):  
Noémi Seres ◽  
Krisztina Fejes
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Slenderness Ratio ◽  
Limit State ◽  
General Definition ◽  
Ultimate Limit State ◽  
Lateral Torsional Buckling ◽  
Torsional Buckling ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Plate Buckling ◽  
Buckling Resistance

This article focuses on the lateral-torsional buckling resistance of girders with slender, class 4 cross-sections with a research aim to check the accuracy of the design resistance model of EN1993-1-1 and EN1993-1-5 on the coupled instability of lateral-torsional buckling and local plate buckling resistances. The current Eurocode-based design method considers in the effective cross-sectional resistance calculation that yield strength is reached in the extreme fibre of the cross-section, and the reduction factor [Formula: see text] related to local plate buckling is calculated based on this assumption. However, if lateral-torsional buckling occurs, maximum stress in the web can be significantly smaller at the ultimate limit state which is not considered in the effective cross-sectional resistance calculation. On the other side, EN1993-1-1 proposes to consider the effective bending moment resistance in the relative slenderness calculation of lateral-torsional buckling, which is in contradiction with the general definition of the relative slenderness ratio [Formula: see text], which should refer to the plastic resistance divided by the critical load of the structure. This article aims to check if the current Eurocode-based design rules need improvement and to check the effect of the above-mentioned specific issues on the calculated lateral-torsional buckling resistance. An extensive numerical research programme is executed to check and compare the lateral-torsional buckling resistance of class 3 (as reference) and class 4 cross-sections, and results are compared to Eurocode-based design models.

Evaluation of CSA S16-14 asymmetry parameter for singly-symmetric beams

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-235
Author(s):  
James C. Koch ◽  
Robert G. Driver ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Michael Manarin
Keyword(s):  
Exact Solutions ◽  
Asymmetry Parameter ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Approximate Equation ◽  
Lateral Torsional Buckling ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Torsional Buckling ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Design Standard ◽  
Sectional Shape

The provisions in the Canadian design standard S16, Design of Steel Structures, for determining the lateral–torsional buckling capacity of unequal-flange I-shaped beams employ an asymmetry parameter, βx, that is a function of the cross-sectional shape. It has been observed that the approximate equation for this parameter in the standard can be highly inaccurate in some cases. A study was completed to compare the approximate values of βx to the exact solutions for 16 312 singly-symmetric I-sections and 188 standard WT-shapes from the CISC Handbook of Steel Construction. It is concluded that the current standard provides extremely variable results, but is generally conservative for use in design, with the exception of T-sections, as long as the larger flange is in compression. Recommendations for adoption into the next edition of the standard are provided.

Buckling Behaviour of Stainless Steel Square Hollow Sections

2016 ◽  
Vol 853 ◽  
pp. 301-305
Author(s):  
Shameem Ahmed ◽  
Mahmud Ashraf ◽  
Mohammad Anwar-Us-Saadat
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Strain Hardening ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Slenderness Ratio ◽  
Design Guidelines ◽  
Material Nonlinearity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Steel Design

Structural stainless steel design guidelines should appropriately recognise its characteristic beneficial properties such as material nonlinearity and significant strain hardening. The Continuous Strength Method (CSM) exploits those through a strain based approach for both stocky and slender cross-sections. In this paper, a new design method is proposed that combines the CSM with Perry type buckling curves. Numerical models were developed to investigate effects of various parameters on column strength and to develop full column curves. It was observed that material nonlinearity significantly influence column strengths, and hence, different column curves were developed for a total of 20 material property combinations by calibrating imperfection factor and limiting slenderness ratio for each set. Proposed method includes the strain hardening benefits for stocky section, and abolished the necessity of calculating effective cross-sectional properties for slender sections. Performance of the proposed technique is compared against those obtained by the Eurocode EN1993-1-4.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document