Research on Evaluation Method of an Excellent Teaching Team

Advanced Materials Research ◽

10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.268-270.664 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 268-270 ◽

pp. 664-669

Author(s):

Hai Zhen Yu ◽

Sheng Zhong

Keyword(s):

Evaluation Method ◽

Set Optimization ◽

Construction Process ◽

Research On Evaluation ◽

Excellent Teaching ◽

Teaching Team ◽

The Individual

This paper, with the concern in view, has presented here a multiobjective optimiza- tion model. By generalizing parameters from the construction process of a team at di_erent stages and from di_erent angles, and by comparing them to the set optimization goal, this model aims to evaluate the outcome of the construction of a team in an accurate and fair way. And by steering clear to the greatest extent of the inuence of the individual or subjective factors, the model also strives to derive a better result from the equal input in the construction of an excellent teaching team.

Download Full-text

Gray Clustering Evaluation Method of MIE on Combinative Weight-Fixing

Key Engineering Materials ◽

10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.455.369 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 455 ◽

pp. 369-372

Author(s):

Yan Feng Li ◽

H.H. Mou ◽

K. Lv

Keyword(s):

Evaluation System ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Construction Process ◽

Clustering Method ◽

Ahp Method ◽

Minimum Error ◽

Research On Evaluation ◽

Advantages And Disadvantages ◽

The Core ◽

The Way

The research on evaluation method of manufacturing enteraprise informatization(MEI) is the core of informatization evaluation system. According to the characters of MEI, a gray clustering evaluation method on combinative weight-fixing is brought forward . In the way to fix the index weights, firstly the advantages and disadvantages of the subjective and objective weight-fixing method are analyzed compositively. Then the subjective weights are gained from Analytical Hierchy Process(AHP) method and the objective weights from Gray Relating Analyses(GRA) method. Last the final indexs’ weights are gained from the combinative weight-fixing method based on the minimum error of optimizing project, which takes in the full advantages of the two methodes. Finally the informatization construction process is devided into certain Gray Types, and the informatization benefits are calculated with Gray Clustering method based on Whiten Function. In the end Three enterprises are chosen to analyze with gray clustering evaluation method on combinative weight-fixing.

Download Full-text

Combining Values

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2002.marapr01 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 1-4, 12 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Christopher R. Brigham

Keyword(s):

Lower Extremity ◽

Upper Extremity ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Proximal Phalanx ◽

Common Error ◽

The Third ◽

Whole Person ◽

Impairment Ratings ◽

Upper Extremity Impairment ◽

The Individual

Abstract To account for the effects of multiple impairments, evaluating physicians must provide a summary value that combines multiple impairments so the whole person impairment is equal to or less than the sum of all the individual impairment values. A common error is to add values that should be combined and typically results in an inflated rating. The Combined Values Chart in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition, includes instructions that guide physicians about combining impairment ratings. For example, impairment values within a region generally are combined and converted to a whole person permanent impairment before combination with the results from other regions (exceptions include certain impairments of the spine and extremities). When they combine three or more values, physicians should select and combine the two lowest values; this value is combined with the third value to yield the total value. Upper extremity impairment ratings are combined based on the principle that a second and each succeeding impairment applies not to the whole unit (eg, whole finger) but only to the part that remains (eg, proximal phalanx). Physicians who combine lower extremity impairments usually use only one evaluation method, but, if more than one method is used, the physician should use the Combined Values Chart.

Download Full-text