Laboratory Study and Evaluation of the Loess Liquefaction under Random Seismic Loading

2012 ◽  
Vol 594-597 ◽  
pp. 1805-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Wang ◽  
Lan Min Wang ◽  
Hai Ping Ma ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Laboratory Study ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Seismic Loading ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Liquefaction Potential ◽  
Passenger Rail ◽  
Triaxial Apparatus ◽  
Forecasting Method ◽  
Rail Line

By using the DSD-160 dynamic triaxial apparatus, liquefaction experiments under random seismic loading of the saturation original samples from a passenger rail line which located in the loess tableland in china was tested. Based on the test results, connected with the forecasting method of the liquefaction test under random seismic loading and the results of seismic hazard analysis, the liquefaction potential of the saturation loess from different regions in the passenger rail line is distinguished. Moreover, the predictions include 50 years probability of exceedance 10% and 2%of the loess liquefaction potential of the sites mentioned above is obtained.

Liquefaction evaluation guidelines for practicing engineering and geological professionals and regulators

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall Lew
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
The State ◽  
Hazard Mapping ◽  
Liquefaction Potential ◽  
Liquefaction Hazard ◽  
Flow Slides

Abstract Liquefaction is a seismic hazard that must be evaluated for a significant percentage of the developable areas of California. The combination of the presence of active seismic faults, young loose alluvium, and shallow ground water are the ingredients that could result in the occurrence of liquefaction in many areas of California. These ingredients are also found in other seismically active areas of the United States and the world. The state of California, through the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act of 1990, has mandated that liquefaction hazard be determined for new construction. On a parallel track, the Uniform Building Code, since 1994, has provisions requiring the determination of liquefaction potential and mitigation of related hazards, such as settlement, flow slides, lateral spreading, ground oscillation, sand boils, and loss of bearing capacity. Fortunately, the state of knowledge has now evolved to where there are field exploration methods and analytical techniques to estimate the liquefaction potential and the possible consequences arising from the occurrence of liquefaction. There are some areas that still need further research. Mitigation for liquefaction has become more commonplace and confidence in these techniques has been increased based on the relatively successful performance of improved sites in the past several major earthquakes. Unfortunately, not all practicing engineering and geological professionals and building officials are knowledgeable about the current state-of-practice in liquefaction hazard analysis and mitigation. Thus, it was considered necessary to develop a set of guidelines to aid professionals and building officials, based on California's experience with the current practice of liquefaction hazard analysis and mitigation. Although the guidelines reported in this paper were written specifically for practice in California, it is believed that guidelines can benefit practitioners to evaluate liquefaction hazard in all seismic regions.

PEMETAAN DAERAH RENTAN GEMPA BUMI SEBAGAI DASAR PERENCANAAN TATA RUANG DAN WILAYAH DI PROVINSI SULAWESI BARAT

KURVATEK ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Marinda noor Eva
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis ◽  
Seismic Hazard Analysis ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard

Penelitian mengenai daerah rawan gempa bumi ini menggunakan Metode Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat, dengan tujuan untuk memetakan tingkat kerawanan bahaya gempa bumi di Kabupaten Mamasa. Penelitian ini menggunakan data kejadian gempa bumi di Pulau Sulawesi dan sekitarnya dari tahun 1900 – 2015. Hasil pengolahan PSHA menggunakan Software Ez-Frisk 7.52 yang menghasilkan nilai hazard di batuan dasar pada kondisi PGA (T = 0,0 sekon), dengan periode ulang 500 tahun dan 2500 tahun berkisar antara (149,54 – 439,45) gal dan (287,18 – 762,81) gal. Nilai hazard di batuan dasar dengan kondisi spektra T = 0,2 sekon untuk periode ulang 500 tahun dan 2500 tahun adalah (307,04 – 1010,90) gal dan (569,48 – 1849,78) gal. Nilai hazard di batuan dasar dengan kondisi spektra T = 1,0 sekon untuk periode ulang 500 tahun dan 2500 tahun diperoleh nilai (118,01 – 265,75) gal dan (223,74 – 510,92) gal. Berdasarkan analisis PSHA, nilai PGA di Provinsi Sulawesi Barat dominan dipengaruhi oleh sumber gempa sesar.

PSHA software review based on the Monte Carlo method

2020 ◽  
pp. 14-24
Author(s):  
V.A. Mironov ◽  
S.A. Peretokin ◽  
K.V. Simonov
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Monte Carlo Method ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Software Review ◽  
Seismic Hazard Analysis ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard ◽  
Test Calculation ◽  
Seismic Surveys ◽  
The Monte Carlo Method

The article is a continuation of the software research to perform probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) as one of the main stages in engineering seismic surveys. The article provides an overview of modern software for PSHA based on the Monte Carlo method, describes in detail the work of foreign programs OpenQuake Engine and EqHaz. A test calculation of seismic hazard was carried out to compare the functionality of domestic and foreign software.

scholarly journals A ground motion logic tree for seismic hazard analysis in the stable cratonic region of Europe: regionalisation, model selection and development of a scaled backbone approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 6119-6148
Author(s):  
Graeme Weatherill ◽  
Fabrice Cotton
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Seismic Hazard Analysis ◽  
Eastern United States ◽  
Logic Tree ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Northeastern Europe

Abstract Regions of low seismicity present a particular challenge for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis when identifying suitable ground motion models (GMMs) and quantifying their epistemic uncertainty. The 2020 European Seismic Hazard Model adopts a scaled backbone approach to characterise this uncertainty for shallow seismicity in Europe, incorporating region-to-region source and attenuation variability based on European strong motion data. This approach, however, may not be suited to stable cratonic region of northeastern Europe (encompassing Finland, Sweden and the Baltic countries), where exploration of various global geophysical datasets reveals that its crustal properties are distinctly different from the rest of Europe, and are instead more closely represented by those of the Central and Eastern United States. Building upon the suite of models developed by the recent NGA East project, we construct a new scaled backbone ground motion model and calibrate its corresponding epistemic uncertainties. The resulting logic tree is shown to provide comparable hazard outcomes to the epistemic uncertainty modelling strategy adopted for the Eastern United States, despite the different approaches taken. Comparison with previous GMM selections for northeastern Europe, however, highlights key differences in short period accelerations resulting from new assumptions regarding the characteristics of the reference rock and its influence on site amplification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document