Effect of Surface Treatments on Bonding Strength of Dental Ceramics to Resin Cements

2007 ◽  
Vol 361-363 ◽  
pp. 829-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Sato ◽  
Seiji Ban ◽  
Masahiro Nawa ◽  
Y. Suehiro ◽  
H. Nakanishi
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Dental Ceramics ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Shear Bonding Strength ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of surface treatments on bonding strength of two kinds of zirconia to three kinds of resin cements. After thermal cycling, the shear bonding strength of both zirconia decreased in all the resin cements. The bonding strengths of two resin cements in which primer contains silane dramatically decreased after the thermal-cycling (p<0.01). Although the surface roughness of both zirconia sandblasted by 125-%m SiC was quite larger than that by 70-%m alumina (p<0.05), there were no significant differences in the bonding strength of the resin cement to both zirconia sandblasted by 70-%m Al2O3 and 125-%m SiC (p>0.05).

Effect of Surface Treatments on Bonding Strength of Dental Ceramics to Resin Cements

2007 ◽  
pp. 829-832
Author(s):  
Hideo Sato ◽  
Seiji Ban ◽  
Masahiro Nawa ◽  
Y. Suehiro ◽  
H. Nakanishi
Keyword(s):  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Dental Ceramics ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Effect Of Surface

Effect of Surface Treatments on Bonding Strength of Zirconia to Dental Cements

2008 ◽  
Vol 396-398 ◽  
pp. 575-578
Author(s):  
Makiko Hashiguchi ◽  
Hideo Sato ◽  
Y. Nishi ◽  
Seiji Ban ◽  
Kristoffer Krnel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Alumina Coating ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Shear Bonding Strength ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of surface treatments on bonding strength of two kinds of zirconia to two kinds of dental cements. After thermal cycling, the shear bonding strength of both zirconia with alumina coating increased in both cements. The shear bonding strength of both zirconia with sandblasting decrease in Fuji plus after thermal cycling (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between NANOZR and Y-TZP (p>0.05). The bonding strengths of NANOZR with the alumina coating were higher than those with sandblasting after thermal-cycling (p<0.05).

scholarly journals Enhanced bonding strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and resin cement by multiple surface treatments after thermal cycling

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e0220466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Li ◽  
Shi Qing Ma ◽  
Cheng Cheng Zang ◽  
Wen Yi Zhang ◽  
Zi Hao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement

scholarly journals Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos José Soares ◽  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira ◽  
Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo ◽  
Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonded Interface ◽  
Luting Composite ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on composite resin on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. Two laboratory composites for indirect restorations, Solidex and Targis, and a conventional composite, Filtek Z250, were tested. Forty-eight composite resin blocks (5.0 x 5.0 x 5.0mm) were incrementally manufactured, which were randomly divided into six groups, according to the surface treatments: 1- control, 600-grit SiC paper (C); 2- silane priming (SI); 3- sandblasting with 50 mm Al2O3 for 10s (SA); 4- etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s (HF); 5- HF + SI; 6 - SA + SI. Composite blocks submitted to similar surface treatments were bonded together with the resin adhesive Single Bond and Rely X luting composite. A 500-g load was applied for 5 minutes and the samples were light-cured for 40s. The bonded blocks were serially sectioned into 3 slabs with 0.9mm of thickness perpendicularly to the bonded interface (n = 12). Slabs were trimmed to a dumbbell shape and tested in tension at 0.5mm/min. For all composites tested, the application of a silane primer after sandblasting provided the highest bond strength means.

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-ceramic Material

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 920-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bandar MA Al-Makramani ◽  
Fuad A Al-Sanabani ◽  
Abdul AA Razak ◽  
Mohamed I Abu-Hassan ◽  
Ibrahim Z AL-Shami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Ceramic Material ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Effect Of Surface

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength (SBS) of Turkom-Cera (Turkom-Ceramic (M) Sdn. Bhd., Puchong, Malaysia) all-ceramic material cemented with resin cement Panavia-F (Kuraray Medical Inc., Okayama, Japan). Materials and methods Forty Turkom-Cera ceramic disks (10 mm × 3 mm) were prepared and randomly divided into four groups. The disks were wet ground to 1000-grit and subjected to four surface treatments: (1) No treatment (Control), (2) sandblasting, (3) silane application, and (4) sandblasting + silane. The four groups of 10 specimens each were bonded with Panavia-F resin cement according to manufacturer's recommendations. The SBS was determined using the universal testing machine (Instron) at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Failure modes were recorded and a qualitative micromorphologic examination of different surface treatments was performed. The data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) tests. Results The SBS of the control, sandblasting, silane, and sandblasting + silane groups were: 10.8 ± 1.5, 16.4 ± 3.4, 16.2 ± 2.5, and 19.1 ± 2.4 MPa respectively. According to the Tukey HSD test, only the mean SBS of the control group was significantly different from the other three groups. There was no significant difference between sandblasting, silane, and sandblasting + silane groups. Conclusion In this study, the three surface treatments used improved the bond strength of resin cement to Turkom-Cera disks. Clinical significance The surface treatments used in this study appeared to be suitable methods for the cementation of glass infiltrated all-ceramic restorations. How to cite this article Razak AAA, Abu-Hassan MI, AL-Makramani BMA, AL-Sanabani FA, AL-Shami IZ, Almansour HM. Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-Ceramic Material. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(11):920-925.

The Effect of Aging and Surface treatments on Micro-shear Bond Strength of Resin Nano-Ceramic Material Using Two Resin Cements

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Mohammed Said
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Hydrofluoric Acid ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of aging and different surface treatments on micro-shear bond strength of two resin cements to resin nano-ceramic composite blocks using an in-vitro study. Materials and methods: Blocks of resin nano-ceramic (Lava Ultimate, 3M, St Paul, Minnesota, USA) were used to prepare eight plates having the following dimensions: (14mm × 12mm × 2mm). After plates preparation they were assigned to two main groups according to the surface treatment applied, either hydrofluoric acid etching and silane or sandblasting and silane. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to analyze the surface topography of the Lava-Ultimate plates before and after application of surface treatments. Two resin cements were used; dual cured adhesive resin cement (Bifix QM, VOCO, Cuxhafen, Germany) and dual cured self-adhesive resin cement (Bifix SE, VOCO, Cuxhafen, Germany) to create a five resin micro-cylinders received on each lava ultimate plate. Ten specimens from each subgroup were tested after 24 hours and the other ten specimens were tested after aging in saline for 6 months. Micro-shear bond strength test was applied until failure. . Multi-factorial ANOVA test and One-way ANOVA followed by pair-wise Tukey’s post-hoc tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Both resin cements showed statistically significant decrease on bond strength after aging. Before aging, both surface treatments with adhesive resin cement showed statistically significant higher micro-shear bond strength mean values than with self-adhesive resin cement. After aging sandblasting showed a statistically significant higher micro-shear bond strength mean values with adhesive resin cement, while hydrofluoric acid etching revealed a statistically non-significant higher values with adhesive resin cement than self-adhesive resin cement. Conclusion: For both surface treatments and resin cements aging had a detrimental effect on micro- shear bond strength.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document