Acoustic Emission Avalanches in Martensitic Transitions: New Perspectives for the Problem of Source Location

2011 ◽  
Vol 172-174 ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Vives ◽  
Daniel Enrique Soto Parra ◽  
Antoni Planes ◽  
Lluís Mañosa ◽  
Ricardo Romero ◽  
...  

Different experimental procedures for the location of sources of Acoustic Emission (AE) avalanches during Martensitic Transformations are discussed. A first example corresponds to the 1D location of AE events during stress-induced martensitic transitions in a Cu-Zn-Al shape memory alloy (3.5 cm length). The obtained data allows monitoring of the interface advancement with a spatial resolution of less than 1 mm. Secondly, we discuss two different ideas that have significant potential for improving this resolution in the case of thermally induced transitions in small single crystalline samples (~1 cm): the use of elastodynamic simulations based on finite element methods and the simultaneous detection of AE and Barkhausen noise in ferromagnetic samples.

2006 ◽  
Vol 13-14 ◽  
pp. 305-312
Author(s):  
Kenichi Yoshida ◽  
T. Yasuda ◽  
D. Tani ◽  
H. Nishino

Dynamic behavior of two types of martensitic transformations during tensile deformation of Cu-Al-Ni shape memory alloy single crystal has been investigated using an acoustic emission waveform analysis. Two kinds of martensitic transformations consist of β1 ⇔ β1′ (structural change of DO3 to 18R) and β1 ⇒ γ1′ (structural change of DO3 to 2H), each of which is called super-elastic and thermo-elastic martensitic transformations, respectively. These two types of martensitic transformations could be obtained during tensile deformation because of different heat treatment. The rise time at the source (the source rise time) in finite elastic solid by the modified Takashima’s method was analyzed using the acoustic emission waveform detected during the martensitic transformation. The mean source rise time to the γ1′ phase was smaller than that to the β1′ phase before yielding and became the same after yielding. The former result means that the nucleation of the γ1′ phase is faster than that of the β1′ phase because of different crystallographic structure. The latter result is that the growth rate of the γ1′ phase is the same as that of the β1′ phase.


2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (22) ◽  
pp. 7473-7487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nihan Tuncer ◽  
Lei Qiao ◽  
Raul Radovitzky ◽  
Christopher A. Schuh

2021 ◽  
pp. 129732
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Kuishan Sun ◽  
Yuqi Jiang ◽  
Xianglong Meng ◽  
Wei Cai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document