Push-out bond strengths of fiber-reinforced composite posts with various resin cements according to the root level

Clinical Relevance Several surface treatments have been proposed for improving the bonding of resin cements or core materials to FRC (fiber-reinforced composite) posts. The possibility of combining chemical and micromechanical retention on post surface provides the most promising adhesion mechanism.

Download Full-text

Bond Strength of Composite Resin Luting Cements to Fiber-reinforced Composite Root Canal Post

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice ◽

10.5005/jcdp-8-6-17 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 8 (6) ◽

pp. 17-24 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Lippo Lassila ◽

Anna-Maria Le Bell-Rönnlöf ◽

Milla Lahdenperä ◽

Pekka Vallittu

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Root Canal ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Interpenetrating Polymer Network ◽

Fiber Reinforced ◽

Luting Cements ◽

Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽

Reinforced Composite ◽

Luting Cement ◽

Bond Strengths

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to compare the attachment of different composite resin luting cements to a fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) post with a semi-interpenetrating polymer network polymer matrix. Methods and Materials Six different brands of composite resin luting cement stubs were applied on the surface of FRC post material and light-cured for 40 seconds. Shear bond strengths of luting cement stubs were measured using a universal testing machine. Results The differences in shear bond strengths between the cements were not statistically significant. Conclusion All of the tested composite resin luting cements provided acceptable attachment to the tested FRC post. The tested FRC post material is suitable to use with different composite resin luting cements. Citation Le Bell-Rönnlöf AM, Lahdenperä M, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Bond Strength of Composite Resin Luting Cements to Fiber-reinforced Composite Root Canal Post. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September; (8)6:017-024.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Self-Etching Ceramic Primer and Conventional Silanization to Bond Strength in Cementation of Fiber Reinforced Composite Post

Materials ◽

10.3390/ma12101585 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (10) ◽

pp. 1585

Author(s):

Nan-Sim Pang ◽

Bock-Young Jung ◽

Byoung-Duck Roh ◽

Yooseok Shin

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Hydrofluoric Acid ◽

Adhesive Bonding ◽

Failure Modes ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Surface Treatments ◽

Fiber Reinforced ◽

Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽

Reinforced Composite ◽

Push Out

Various mechanical and chemical surface treatments have been proposed to improve the retention of fiber-reinforced composite post (FRCP), but the results are still controversial. The bond strength and durability of a self-etching ceramic primer, which was recently released as an alternative to etching and silane, are not yet known. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the push-out bond strength of different surface treatments of FRCPs after an artificial aging procedure. Four groups (n = 10) were established to evaluated FRCP surface treatments (dentin adhesive bonding; silane and adhesive bonding; hydrofluoric acid, silane and adhesive bonding; and a self-etching ceramic primer). They were bonded with dual-curing rein cement (Multilink N) and stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 30 days, then thermal cycled for 7500 cycles. After being sectioned into 1 mm thickness, each coronal and apical part was evaluated for its the push-out bond strength by a universal testing machine. Each debonded specimen was observed by an optical microscope and divided according to the failure modes. The results showed that silane treatment significantly improved push-out bond strength, but the self-etching ceramic primer did not do so. Additional hydrofluoric acid treatment or the adhesive bonding agent alone did not significantly improve the retention of FRCPs. Cohesive failure of the luting material was found most frequently in all groups.

Download Full-text

Comparison of push-out bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite resin posts according to cement thickness

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry ◽

10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.007 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 118 (3) ◽

pp. 372-378 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jun-Seong Park ◽

Jeong-Sub Lee ◽

Jeong-Won Park ◽

Won-Gyun Chung ◽

Eun-Hee Choi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Composite Resin ◽

Fiber Reinforced ◽

Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽

Reinforced Composite ◽

Push Out

Download Full-text

In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry ◽

10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.04.002 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 97 (5) ◽

pp. 271-278 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Isil Cekic ◽

Gulfem Ergun ◽

Sadullah Uctasli ◽

Lippo V.J. Lassila

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Tooth Surface ◽

Fiber Reinforced ◽

In Vitro Evaluation ◽

Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽

Ceramic Inlays ◽

Reinforced Composite ◽

Push Out

Download Full-text

Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal?

Bioengineering ◽

10.3390/bioengineering8120195 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (12) ◽

pp. 195

Author(s):

Naji Kharouf ◽

Salvatore Sauro ◽

Hamdi Jmal ◽

Ammar Eid ◽

Mohamed Karrout ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Root Canal ◽

Testing Machine ◽

Single Fiber ◽

Fiber Reinforced ◽

Fiber Reinforced Composite ◽

Reinforced Composite ◽

Filling Ability ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Push Out

The purpose of the present in vitro study was to investigate the bond strength of root canal dentin and the filling ability of a new multi-fiber-reinforced composite post (mFRC) compared to a conventional single fiber-reinforced-composite post (sFRC). Twenty-eight freshly maxillary first permanent single-rooted premolars were instrumented and divided into groups (n = 14). Group 1: single-fiber-reinforced composite (sFRC), group 2: multi-fiber-reinforced composite (mFRC). Bonding procedures were performed using a dual-cure universal adhesive system and resin cement. All specimens were sectioned so that seven discs of 1 mm of thickness were obtained from each root. An optical microscope was used before the push-out test to measure the total area of the voids and to determine the length of the smaller/bigger circumferences. The push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed using an Instron universal testing machine. Data were then compared by one-way ANOVA on ranks (α = 0.05). The dentin–cement–post interface was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). At the coronal third, a significantly higher bond strength (p < 0.05) was obtained in the sFRC group (44.7 ± 13.1 MPa) compared to the mFRC group (37.2 ± 9.2 MPa). No significant difference was detected between the groups at the middle third (sFRC group “33.7 ± 12.5 MPa” and mFRC group “32.6 ± 12.4 MPa”) (p > 0.05). Voids were significantly lower in the mFRC compared to those observed in the sFRC group (p < 0.05) at the coronal third. Whereas, no significant difference was found at the middle third (p > 0.05) between the tested groups. Filling ability was overall improved when employing mFRC, although such technique might have characteristic limitations concerning the bond strength to dentin.

Download Full-text