In Search of a Rotorcraft Airframe Fatigue Assessment Methodology: Cracking Prediction under Service Loading

Author(s):  
Suresh Moon ◽  
Nam Phan
2021 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 102892
Author(s):  
G.M. Gemilang ◽  
P.A.S. Reed ◽  
A.J. Sobey

2013 ◽  
Vol 569-570 ◽  
pp. 406-413
Author(s):  
Dermot W. O'Dwyer

This paper discusses the benefits to using direct strain measurements when undertaking a fatigue assessment of a railway bridge. The paper gives a brief overview of the assessment methodology for assessing fatigue in a bridge carrying a single track before outlining a method suitable for assessing multi-track bridges. The accuracy of a fatigue assessment depends on the level of knowledge of many different parameters including: an accurate loading history comprising axle loads and train frequencies over its service life; details of changes to the track form, including changes in the depth of ballast; and changes to the structure including damage or repairs. Many of these parameters are not known with certainty. However, using monitoring systems to measure the strain cycles in a bridge helps to address some of these uncertainties and hence improves the accuracy of the assessment.


Author(s):  
Marcelo Favaro Borges ◽  
Eduardo Vardaro ◽  
George Campello ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Fortis Kwietniewski

Production of oil and gas in the Brazilian pre-salt will face several technical challenges. One of them that is a major concern is the fatigue life of top risers end-fittings. The new ultra-deep water fields will require a complete new fatigue assessment methodology with higher accuracy. Besides that, the historical data of failure for this sort of equipment shows that the current methodology is not quite optimized for floating units operating in deep water fields. With this, even worst results are expected in ultra-deep water fields. During its assembly inside the end-fitting, the tensile armor wires need to be folded, unfolded and set in position using epoxy resin. This assembly process involves localized plastic deformation and as consequence of this produces a complex residual stress field and also introduces an elastic stress to maintain the wires in position. Both stresses are not actually taken into account in the current fatigue assessment methodology. Therefore, the aim of this work is to develop and evaluate a new fatigue assessment methodology for top risers end-fittings based on remote S-N curves. The proposed methodology takes into account both residual and assembly elastic stresses. The effect of stress concentration on the tensile armor wire at the region with localized plastic deformation is also evaluated. Basically, the objectives of this investigation will be achieved through the construction of remote S-N curves using a test box that contains the deformed wire embedded in resin representing a single wire physical 2D model of an end-fitting, the so called mid-scale testing. For this investigation, a six inches API end-fitting was selected because it is widely used and most available in the market. The results produced here indicated that the localized plastic deformation imposed during the folding and unfolding process has a very important detrimental effect on the flexible risers end-fittings tensile armor wires fatigue life, which makes mandatory a revision of the current four-point bending fatigue assessment methodology.


Author(s):  
Zeynab Shirband ◽  
Adrian Gosselin ◽  
Stuart Guest ◽  
Lee Falcon

Abstract For continued safe operation of pipelines, thousands of integrity digs are conducted every year to repair ILI detected defects. Integrity-driven pipeline excavations can be quite costly, present significant scheduling challenges with landowner consultation and seasonal access limitations, and an unmitigated defect may have required a pressure reduction or service outage, resulting in a loss of revenue from the asset. Dents are known to be one of the drivers for many integrity excavations, especially for liquid pipelines. A pipeline with a minimal mechanical deformation is not expected to fail immediately, however, severe pressure cycles combined with the geometric distortion can cause fatigue crack initiation and growth that can lead to failure. To account for the possibility of fatigue failure, recent changes to pipeline codes, such as CSA Z662, are requiring pipeline operators to repair any dent susceptible to fatigue failure unless an engineering assessment proves it is fit for service. A commonly used dent fatigue assessment methodology is outlined in API RP 579, also known as the EPRG-2000 model. The assessment methodology uses an S-N curve from DIN 2413 part 1 with a safety factor of 10, which has been derived from undamaged pressurized pipe sections experiencing pressure cycles with stress ratios of zero, and separate stress enhancement factors for dents and gouges which take into account the shape of dents and gouges. To account for the effect of mean stress, Gerber mean stress correction, which has been developed for pressure cycles with stress ratios of −1 (i.e., for fatigue bar specimens), is also applied on pressure cycles. According to the literature, API 579 Level 2 fatigue assessment methodology results in very conservative estimates of fatigue lives compared to experimental data. This paper will discuss the potential factors resulting in conservative assessments and propose refinements in the methodology. This will include the safety factor used for pipes with known operating pressure fluctuations and the mean stress correction model suitable for a pipeline with pressure cycles that have R ratios greater than zero. The acceptable number of cycles obtained using the proposed refinements were compared to experimental data and EPRG-1995 model’s predictions — the comparison revealed that the proposed methodology results in a more realistic safety margin for dented pipelines. The proposed methodology can be used as a part of engineering assessments in mechanical damage integrity management programs to improve the pipeline operator’s understanding of a dent’s remaining life and enable a more appropriate repair timeline.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarek Krajewski ◽  
Sebastian Schnieder ◽  
Martin Golz ◽  
Thomas Schnupp ◽  
Christian Heinze

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document