The Significance of Space Available for the Spinal cord at the Injured Level in the Lower Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations

1997 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Jin Song ◽  
Kyung Rae Lee
Neurosurgery ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Benzel Edward ◽  
J. Larson Sanford

Abstract Thirty-five patients with complete myelopathies secondary to cervical spine fractures from C-4 to C-7 underwent spinal decompressions and fusions between 1975 and 1981. Twenty-five of these patients underwent simultaneous nerve root decompressions, 23 with an accompanying anterior decompression and fusion and 2 with an accompanying posterior fusion. Substantial recovery of nerve root function occurred in 15 of these patients. A posterior reduction and fusion without nerve root decompression was performed in each of the remaining 10 patients. None of these patients demonstrated a significant improvement neurologically. Operation for nerve root decompression is indicated in selected victims of spinal cord injury.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 862-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parham Daneshvar ◽  
Darren M. Roffey ◽  
Yasser A. Brikeet ◽  
Eve C. Tsai ◽  
Chris S. Bailey ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Benzel ◽  
Sanford J. Larson

Abstract Ninety-nine patients with cervical spine fractures from C-4 through C-7 were operated upon from 1975 to 1981. Operation was performed to restore normal relationships between the spinal cord and roots and the spinal canal and foramina and to maintain these relationships by fusion when necessary. Neurological function was recorded pre- and postoperatively using a functional scale. Satisfactory fusion without adverse change in vertebral alignment was achieved in each patient. The average interval between injury and operation was 29 days. When neurological recovery was observed, it began promptly after operation, suggesting a cause and effect relationship.


2000 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 1030-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANILO GONÇALVES COELHO ◽  
ALBERT V. B. BRASIL ◽  
NELSON PIRES FERREIRA

Eighty-nine patients with lower cervical spine fractures or dislocations were evaluated for risk factors of neurological lesion. The age, sex, level and pattern of fracture and sagittal diameter of the spinal canal were analysed. There were no significant differences on the age, gender, level and Torg's ratio between intact patients and those with nerve root injury, incomplete or complete spinal cord injuries. Bilateral facet dislocations and burst fractures are a significant risk factor of spinal cord injury.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Vesel ◽  
I. Straus ◽  
S. Al Mawed ◽  
M. Dobravec ◽  
M. Jug

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali A. Baaj ◽  
Juan S. Uribe ◽  
Tann A. Nichols ◽  
Nicholas Theodore ◽  
Neil R. Crawford ◽  
...  

Object The objective of this work was to search a national health care database of patients diagnosed with cervical spine fractures in the US to analyze discharge, demographic, and hospital charge trends over a 10-year period. Methods Clinical data were derived from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the years 1997 through 2006. The NIS is maintained by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and represents a 20% random stratified sample of all discharges from nonfederal hospitals within the US. Patients with cervical spine fractures with and without spinal cord injury (SCI) were identified using the appropriate ICD-9-CM codes. The volume of discharges, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, total national charges, discharge pattern, age, and sex were analyzed. National estimates were calculated using the HCUPnet tool. Results Approximately 200,000 hospitalizations were identified. In the non-SCI group, there was a 74% increase in hospitalizations and charges between 1997 and 2006, but LOS changed minimally. There was no appreciable change in the rate of in-hospital mortality (< 3%), but discharges home with home health care and to skilled rehabilitation or nursing facilities increased slightly. In the SCI group, hospitalizations and charges increased by 29 and 38%, respectively. There were no significant changes in LOS or discharge status in this group. Spinal cord injury was associated with increases in LOS, charges, and adverse outcomes compared with fractures without SCI. Total national charges associated with both groups combined exceeded $1.3 billion US in 2006. Conclusions During the studied period, increases in hospitalizations and charges were observed in both the SCI and non-SCI groups. The percentage increase was higher in the non-SCI group. Although SCI was associated with higher adverse outcomes, there were no significant improvements in immediate discharge status in either group during the 10 years analyzed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baohui Yang ◽  
Teng Lu ◽  
Haopeng Li

For patients with AS and lower cervical spine fractures, surgical methods have mainly included the single anterior approach, single posterior approach, and combined anterior-posterior approach. However, various surgical procedures were utilized because the fractures have not been clearly classified according to presence of displacement in these previous studies. Consequently, controversies have been raised regarding the selection of the surgical procedure. This study retrospective analysis was conducted in 12 patients with AS and lower cervical spine fractures and dislocations and explored single-session combined anterior-posterior approach for the treatment of AS with obvious displaced lower cervical spine fractures and dislocations which has demonstrated advantages such as good stabilization, satisfied fracture healing, and easy postoperative cares. However, to some extent, the difficulty and risk of this approach should be considered. Attention should be paid to the prevention of perioperative complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document