Mayo Internal Medicine Board Review 2000-01

2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 1104
Author(s):  
David L. Battinelli
Author(s):  
Robert D. Ficalora

Chapter 15 presents multiple-choice, board review questions on cross-content areas including geriatrics, preventive medicine, women’s health, general internal medicine, quality improvement, medical ethics, palliative care, and perioperative medicine. Full explanations are provided with the correct answers.


Author(s):  
Charles A. Morris

This chapter provides 21 General Internal Medicine Board Review Questions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S57-S57
Author(s):  
James B Cutrell ◽  
James B Cutrell ◽  
Binh-Minh Le ◽  
Heather R Wolfe ◽  
Helen King ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Traditional infectious diseases (ID) rotations for internal medicine (IM) residents focus on inpatient consultation, potentially skewing trainees’ perspectives on ID. We report our experience with a hybrid inpatient–outpatient ID rotation which provides broader ID clinical exposure and an effective venue for educational innovation. Methods We included all IM residents completing an assigned ID rotation in the UT Southwestern IM residency since July 2013. From July 2013 to June 2017, a 4-week ambulatory ID (Amb ID) rotation, consisting of general and subspecialty ID clinics and weekly teaching sessions focused on ID board review, was offered in parallel to traditional inpatient ID consult rotations. From July 2017 to present, all assigned residents complete up to a 4-week ID hybrid rotation, consisting of 2 weeks of ambulatory ID and 2 weeks of inpatient ID consults, with all residents receiving weekly teaching sessions; in some cases, the 4 weeks were not completed sequentially. Data were collected on resident numbers and training level, quantitative and qualitative course evaluations, and program in-training examination scores in ID content areas. Results From July 2013 to June 2019, IM residents completed a total of 626 ID rotations, an average of 104 per year (Table 1). A sample ID hybrid schedule is shown in Table 2. Overall resident satisfaction with the ID hybrid rotation was 4.7 (std. dev. 0.7) on a 5-point Likert scale. This rotation has consistently been among the highest rated rotations by residents. In-training examination ID scores increased significantly with creation of the Amb ID rotation in 2013 and further increased since 2017 with creation of the ID hybrid, in which both inpatient and ambulatory residents receive the weekly teaching sessions (Figure 1). Pilot educational innovations through this rotation include an online web-based antibiotic stewardship curriculum (2014–2015) and a mobile app-based ID board review platform utilizing spaced interval learning (2018–2019). Conclusion A hybrid inpatient–outpatient ID rotation for IM residents has proven to be a highly effective platform for ID education and curriculum innovation at our institution. This concept could be exported to other institutions and increase IM resident interest and breadth of clinical exposure in ID. Disclosures Ank E. Nijhawan, MD, MPH, Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Research Grant.


Mayo Clinic Internal Medicine Board Review: Questions and Answers is designed specifically to help prepare physicians-in-training and practising clinicians for the ABIM certification and maintenance-of-certification examinations in internal medicine. This question-and-answer resource tests physicians and physicians-in-training on all relevant material related to the goals set forth by ABIM to ensure the success of internal medicine clinicians. Each chapter is structured as a potential patient encounter with multiple-choice diagnostic and treatment responses. By testing physicians-in-training and practising clinician's knowledge of internal medicine and clinical thinking skills, Mayo Clinic Internal Medicine Board Review: Questions and Answers seeks to promote the best education and care in internal medicine.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supratik Rayamajhi ◽  
Prajwal Dhakal ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
Manoj P Rai ◽  
Shiva Shrotriya

Abstract Objective: To evaluate if United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, USMLE Step 2 CK, USMLE Step 3, and residency third-year in-service training exam (ITE) results predict the results of residents in American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Exam (ABIM-CE). Methods: A retrospective review of USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2, USMLE Step 3 scores, residency third year ITE and ABIM-CE of IM residents at our residency program from 2004 through 2017 was conducted. Pearson correlation coefficient and two-sample t-tests were used to assess the relationship between various scores. Multivariate logistic regression was used to predict pass or fail results in ABIM-CE using USMLE and third-year ITE test scores controlling for other covariates. Results: Among 114 MD residents included in the study; 92% (n=105) passed the ABIM-CE. USMLE score was a significant predictor of passing ABIM-CE. The OR of passing ABIM-CE was 2.70 (95 % CI=1.38-5.29), 2.31 (95% CI=1.33-4.01), and 1.63 (95% CI=0.81-3.29) with a ten-point increase in USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2 and USMLE step 3 scores respectively. OR of ABIM-CE passing chance was 2.96 (95% CI=0.95-9.20) with a ten-point increase in the average score of the above three exams. A five percent increase in ITE percentage raised the likelihood of passing ABIM-CE (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.15-7.38). All residents who failed ABIM-CE had Step 1 scores <220. Among 31 residents with Step 2 score <220, 20% (n=6) failed ABIM. Similarly, 9% of residents with USMLE Step 3 score < 220 failed ABIM-CE; all residents who failed had scored < 220. The probability curve predicted that the chance of passing ABIM- CE was around 80% with USMLE scores greater than 200 and increased to almost 100% with USMLE scores of 250 or more. Conclusion: USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2, and third-year ITE scores strongly predict the chances of passing ABIM-CE. Thus, programs can identify internal medicine residents at risk of failing ABIM-CE and need intervention at an early stage. Various measures such as enrolling them in question banks or board review courses can then be implemented by programs to improve their chances to pass.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document