scholarly journals Femoral neck morphology differentiates femoral neck from vertebral osteoporotic fracture

Reumatismo ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Malavolta ◽  
M. Frigato ◽  
R. Mulè ◽  
C. Ripamonti
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Vertebral Osteoporotic Fracture

Cortical Fractal Analysis and Collagen Crosslinks Content in Femoral Neck After Osteoporotic Fracture in Postmenopausal Women: Comparison with Osteoarthritis

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Davi Rabelo ◽  
Jean-Paul Roux ◽  
Nathalie Portero-Muzy ◽  
Evelyne Gineyts ◽  
Roland Chapurlat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Fractal Analysis ◽  
Collagen Crosslinks

EMAS position statement: The management of postmenopausal women with vertebral osteoporotic fracture

Maturitas ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis K. Triantafyllopoulos ◽  
Kalliopi Lambropoulou-Adamidou ◽  
Cleopatra C. Nacopoulos ◽  
Nikolaos A. Papaioannou ◽  
Iuliana Ceausu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Vertebral Osteoporotic Fracture

scholarly journals Comparison of osteoporotic fracture risk in surgical and natural menopausal patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-327
Author(s):  
Ayça Utkan Karasu ◽  
Yetkin Karasu ◽  
Müzeyyen Gülnur Özakşit ◽  
Yusuf Üstün ◽  
Yaprak Üstün Engin
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Lumbar Vertebrae ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Natural Menopause ◽  
T Score ◽  
Surgical Menopause

Objectives: This study aims to compare the fracture risk calculated with Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) in patients with natural and surgical menopause. Patients and methods: Between April 2019 and July 2019, 285 postmenopausal patients (mean age 57.3 years; range, 40 to 78 years) who were admitted to the menopause clinic were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. Of these, 220 were in natural menopause and 65 were in surgical menopause. Demographic data, medical history, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire scores were collected through face-to-face interviews with the patients. Femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) T-scores were evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Fragility fracture risk was assessed using FRAX®. Results: The groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, duration of menopause, smoking, alcohol use, and history of fracture (p>0.05). The risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture calculated without adding bone mineral density (BMD) was similar between groups (p=0.417 and p=0.234). The risk of hip fracture calculated with the addition of BMD was higher in natural menopause patients (p=0.023). Lumbar vertebrae T-scores were similar between two groups regardless of age; femoral neck T-scores were higher in surgical menopause (T-score=-0.8) than natural menopause group (T-score=-1.25) aged under 60 years, whereas this difference disappeared after 60 years of age. Conclusion: In our study, the fracture risk and the severity of osteoporosis were not different in surgical menopausal patients compared to the natural menopausal patients. Hip fracture risk calculated using BMD was lower in patients under 50 years of age in surgical menopausal patients. However, the fracture risks were similar in both groups after 50 years of age.

scholarly journals Unusual cup reconstruction of massive acetabulum perforation in neglected femoral neck osteoporotic fracture: A case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 265-269
Author(s):  
Franky Hartono ◽  
Karina Besinga ◽  
Daniel Petrus Marpaung ◽  
Andrew B. Budisantoso ◽  
Tessi Ananditya
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture

Interactive effect of sarcopenia and falls on vertebral osteoporotic fracture in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-jing Tong ◽  
Sheng-qian Xu ◽  
Jian-xiong Wang ◽  
He-xiang Zong ◽  
Yi-ran Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
Vertebral Osteoporotic Fracture

Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound of the os calcis to predict vertebral osteoporotic fracture

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (S1) ◽  
pp. 197-197
Author(s):  
S. Morillo ◽  
P. Rey ◽  
I. Laborde ◽  
MP. Alessandrini ◽  
C. Errecalde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Os Calcis ◽  
Vertebral Osteoporotic Fracture

scholarly journals SAT0094 ASSESMENT OF BONE MINERAL DENSITY AND FRACTURE RISK IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND SARCOPENIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 980.2-981
Author(s):  
O. Dobrovolskaya ◽  
Z. Kolkhidova ◽  
A. Menshikova ◽  
N. Demin ◽  
N. Toroptsova
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Osteoporotic Fracture ◽  
Proximal Femur ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Major Osteoporotic Fracture

Background:The problem of sarcopenia (SP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is particularly significant in terms of assessing the risk of fractures, since SP leads to falls, which are an independent risk factor for fractures along with RA and osteoporosis.Objectives:To evaluate the bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk in women with RA and SP.Methods:79 women with RA based on the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were included: 20 (25%) women with confirmed SP (age median 59 [53; 64]) according to EWGSOP2 criteria and 59 (75%) women without SP (age median 60 [55; 67]) (p>0.05). We assessed clinical data: age, body mass index (BMI), disease duration, anthropometric measurements, C-reactive protein level, disease activity score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), previous medication use including glucocorticoids and methotrexate, muscle strength and function. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure BMD of lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) was performed. The 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (clinical spine, forearm, hip or shoulder fracture) and the 10-year probability hip fracture was calculated using the Russian version of the FRAX® tool. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric methods. All patients signed an informed consent to participate.Results:Median BMD in LS was 0.892 [0.772; 1.024] g/cm2in patients with SP and 0.910 [0.785; 1.028] g/cm2- without SP (p>0.05). There was significant difference between groups in the proximal femur BMD: 0.760 [0.731; 0.826] g/cm2in TH and 0.681 [0.607; 0.703] g/cm2in FN in patients with SP and 0.838 [0.735; 0.921] g/cm2in TH and 0.719 [0.622; 0.804] g/cm2in FN in patients without SP (p=0.009 and p=0.048, respectively). The frequency of osteoporosis was 35% and 22% in patients with and without SP (p>0,05). The 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture with / without femoral neck BMD data was 22,0% [17,0; 32,0] / 19,5% [18,5; 22,5 and 13,3% [9,8; 18,5] / 12,8% [9,3; 17,0] in patients with SP and without SP (р<0.05) and the 10-year probability of hip fracture with / without femoral neck BMD data - 3,1% [3,0; 7,5] / 3,1% [2,3; 3,3] and 1,4% [0,9; 2,78] / 0,65 [0,4; 1,7], respectively (р<0.05).Conclusion:There were no differences in the frequency of osteoporosis between patients with SP and without SP, however women with SP had proximal femur BMD less than women without SP. The probability of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture was significantly higher in patients with RA and SP compared with patients without SP.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document