scholarly journals The clinical manifestations at the onset of antisynthetase syndrome: A chameleon with multiple faces

Reumatismo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-92
Author(s):  
A.C.C.D. Baccaro ◽  
G.L. Behrens Pinto ◽  
R.C.S. Carboni ◽  
S.K. Shinjo

The antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) is clinically characterized by fever, myositis, interstitial lung disease, joint involvement, mechanic’s hands, or Raynaud’s phenomenon, and the presence of antisynthetase autoantibodies. These clinical manifestations may not occur simultaneously. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the sequence in which these clinical manifestations can develop at the onset of ASS. This retrospective, single-center cohort study enrolled 55 ASS patients. Their mean age at the onset of ASS symptoms was 42.3±11.8 years. There was a predominance of female patients (75.9%) and white patients (72.7%). At initial presentation, 41.8% of the patients had fever, 43.6% had joint symptoms, 38.2% had myositis, 36.4% had interstitial lung disease, 18.2% had Raynaud’s phenomenon, and 16.4% had mechanic’s hands. Subsequent clinical symptoms emerged at varying time points. In two out of 55 cases, joint, muscle, and lung manifestations developed simultaneously. The median time between the onset of symptoms and the complete ASS clinical manifestation was 19.9 (4.0-60.2) months; whereas, the timeframe between the onset of symptoms and the ASS diagnosis was 29.0 (11.0-63.0) months. The confounding misdiagnoses interfering with the initial diagnosis were polymyositis (52.7%), dermatomyositis (29.1%), nonspecific interstitial pneumopathy (23.6%), rheumatoid arthritis (18.2%), and others (10.9%). Clinical features at the onset of ASS are highly variable. Consequently, confounding factors can lead to significant delays for the final and definitive diagnosis of ASS. Therefore, ASS should be considered a differential diagnosis in patients with initial symptoms of joint, lung, and/or muscle involvements, as well as fever, mechanic’s hands, and/or Raynaud’s phenomenon manifestations.

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (8) ◽  
pp. 1566-1574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jutta Bauhammer ◽  
Norbert Blank ◽  
Regina Max ◽  
Hanns-Martin Lorenz ◽  
Ulrich Wagner ◽  
...  

Objective.Rituximab (RTX) has been used successfully for the treatment of severe Jo1 antibody-associated antisynthetase syndrome. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of RTX in severe Jo1 antisynthetase syndrome and determine predictive factors for response.Methods.There were 61 patients with Jo1 antisynthetase syndrome identified; 18 of these received RTX. One patient was lost to followup. The remaining 17 patients and 30 out of 43 patients who were treated with conventional immunosuppressive (IS) drugs were followed for a mean of 35 months and 84 months, respectively.Results.Polymyositis/dermatomyositis (95%) and interstitial lung disease (ILD; 66%) were the dominant clinical manifestations. Detection of anti-Ro52 antibodies (43%) was significantly associated with acute-onset ILD (p = 0.016) with O2 dependency, and patients with high concentrations of anti-Ro52 (20%) had the highest risk (p = 0.0005). Sixteen out of 18 patients (89%) showed a fast and marked response to RTX. Among those patients who were highly positive for anti-Ro52, response to RTX was seen in 7 out of 7 cases (100%), but no response to cyclophosphamide (n = 4), cyclosporine A (n = 3), azathioprine (n = 9), methotrexate (n = 5), or leflunomide (n = 2) was observed. One patient treated with RTX died of pneumonia.Conclusion.RTX is effective in the treatment of severe forms of Jo1 antisynthetase syndrome. In our retrospective study, the presence of high anti-Ro52 antibody concentrations predicts severe acute-onset ILD and nonresponse to IS drugs. In contrast to conventional IS, RTX is equally effective in patients with Jo1 antisynthetase syndrome, independent of their anti-Ro52 antibody status.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Cen ◽  
Chuan Zuo ◽  
Min Yang ◽  
Geng Yin ◽  
Qibing Xie

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and severe complication of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The aim of our study was to identify risk factors for ILD by evaluating both clinical and biochemical features in IIM patients with or without ILD. From January 2008 to December 2011, medical records of 134 IIM patients in our rheumatology unit were reviewed. The patients were divided into ILD group (83 patients) and non-ILD group (51 patients). The clinical features and laboratory findings were compared. The univariable analyses indicated that arthritis/arthralgia (54.2% versus 17.6%,P<0.05), Mechanic’s hand (16.9% versus 2.0%,P<0.05), Raynaud’s phenomenon (36.1% versus 2.0%,P<0.05), heliotrope rash (44.6% versus 19.6%,P<0.05), fever (43.4% versus 21.6%,P<0.05), elevated ESR (60.2% versus 35.3%,P<0.05), elevated CRP (55.4% versus 31.4%,P<0.05), or anti-Jo-1 antibody (20.5% versus 5.9%,P<0.05) were risk factors for developing ILD in IIM. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression analysis that showed arthritis/arthralgia (OR 7.1, 95% CI 2.8–18.1), Raynaud’s phenomenon (OR 29.1, 95% CI 3.6–233.7), and amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) (OR 20.2, 95% CI 2.4–171.2) were the independent risk factors for developing ILD in IIM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1075.1-1075
Author(s):  
P. Muñoz Reinoso ◽  
I. García Hernández ◽  
M. Ferrer Galván ◽  
F. J. Toyos Sáenz de Miera ◽  
L. Fernández de la Fuente Bursón ◽  
...  

Background:The antisynthetase syndrome (SAS) is characterized by the presence of antisynthetase antibodies, anti-JO1, PL7 y PL12 are the most common; and the classic triad of myositis, arthritis, and diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD)1. Most patients present incomplete forms and the severity of the ILD determines the prognosis of the disease2.Objectives:to analyze epidemiological, clinical and serological characteristics and treatments used in a cohort of patients with SAS.Methods:descriptive study of review of medical records. Data were collected from 15 patients with SAS followed in the Rheumatology and Pneumology consultations of the Virgen Macarena Hospital (Seville) in the last 10 years. The analysis was carried out using the R software.Results:15 patients were included, 8 men and 7 women. The median age was 56 years (33-77). Seven patients (47%) used to smoke. Four patients (27%) met the classical triad. All of them presented ILD and 8 patients (53%) had arthritis and / or myositis. Five (33%) had mechanic’s hands and six of them (40%) presented Raynaud. Seven (47%) suffered from dyspnea before the SAS diagnosis. The median diagnostic delay was 1 month (0-43). Seven (47%) patients had anti-JO1, 1 (7%) anti-PL7, 2 (13%) anti-PL12 and 2 (13%) patients anti-Ro52. Radiological patterns detected by HRCT were: 5 (33%) NINE, 4 (37%) NIU and 6 (40%) others. The initial treatment included mostly (66%) glucocorticoids (GC) and one or more cFAME. In maintenance, mycophenolate was used in 7 patients (47%), cyclosporine 5 (33%), cyclophosphamide in 3 cases (20%), azathioprine in 3 patients (20%) and methotrexate in 3 of them (20%). Four (37%) patients required a combination of DMARDs and 2 cases needed (13%) biological therapy, Rituximab and Tocilizumab. Changes in the mean value of the initial respiratory function tests (FVC1 and DLCO1) and during follow-up (FVC2 and DLCO2) were not relevant (FVC1 81.5% [42-110], FVC2 81% [59-115]; DLCO1 83% [10-112], DLCO2 80.5% [47-108]). Nine patients (60%) remained clinically stable and 3 patients (20%) progressed radiologically. Four patients died from ILD progression.Conclusion:In this study, the incomplete diagnosis of SAS predominated. The most detected antibody was anti-JO1. ILD is present in all cases, with NINE being the most frequent pattern so multidisciplinary management is necessary. Most used treatments were GC and FAMES combined, some cases required biological therapy.References:[1]Irazoque F, et al. Epidemiology, etiology and classification. Reumatol Clin. 2009;5:2-5.[2]Johnson C, et al. Clinical and pathologic differences in interstitial lung disease based on antisynthetase antibody type. Respir Med. 2014; 108(10):1542-8.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1222.2-1222
Author(s):  
R. Ortega Castro ◽  
P. S. Laura ◽  
F. U. Pilar ◽  
J. Calvo Gutierrez ◽  
A. Requejo-Jimenez ◽  
...  

Background:Diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequently associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD) and is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Recently, the concept of Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features (IPAF) has been defined to characterize ILD associated with systemic manifestations limited to subtle serological and clinical autoimmune abnormalities and not fulfilling the international criteria for the diagnosis of a given CTD.Objectives:The objective of this study is to describe the clinical, serological and radiological characteristics, as well as the treatment patterns of patients with ILD referred to a Rheumatology Service for suspected CTDMethods:Observational, cross-sectional study of 43 patients with ILD referred for evaluation to the medical consultation of CTD of the Rheumatology service at the Reina Sofía Hospital. Patients were classified as patients with defined CTD, patient with IPAF and patients with other types of pneumopathy. We conducted a descriptive study of all patients and compared the clinical-analytical-radiological characteristics and treatment patterns of the first two groups.Results:Of the 43 patients, 67.40% were women with a mean age at diagnosis of 65.65 (10.42) years and 53.50% of smoking patientsOf the total of patients, 16 (37.2%) were included in the CTD group, 17 (39.5%) met criteria for IPAF and 10 (23.3%) had another type of pneumopathy.In the CTD group scleroderma was the most frequent disease (6/16), followed by inflammatory myopathy (4/16), Sjögren’s syndrome (3/16), rheumatoid arthritis (2/16) and polymyalgia rheumatic (1/16). In this group of patients, the most common symptom was Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) (7/16), followed by arthritis (7/16) and mechanic’s hands (3/16). Regarding the most frequently antibodies were ANA (100%), anti-RO (41.7%), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (30%) and rheumatoid factor (RF) (28.6%).In patients with IPAF, as in the CTD group, the most observed clinical criterion was RP (5/17), followed by arthritis (1/17) and mechanic’s hands (1/17). Among the serological criteria the most common antibodies were ANA (100%), followed by anti-RO (33.3%), anti-RNA synthetase (28.6%) and RF (22.2%).Regarding the radiological pattern, in both groups the most frequent was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, followed by the indeterminate pattern and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in third place. There were no significant differences by gender and age, between the group of CTD and IPAF, observing in both groups a predominance of women with a similar mean age, being the upper smoking habit in the IPAF group (70.6% vs 31.5%, p= 0.02). Regarding the treatment used, the use of immunosuppressants (IS) was more frequent in CTD group (56.3% vs 11.8%, p = 0.007).Conclusion:The clinical-serological and radiological characteristics were similar among patients with IPAF and CTD, which supports the notion of a similar pathophysiology in both groups. In our cohort patients with CTD received IS more frequently than IPAF group, however, future work would be necessary to assess whether the response to treatment is similar in these populations and if IS can benefit patients with IPAF to long term. In addition, it could be useful to include the UIP pattern within the IPAF classification criteria, not currently included, since it is the third most frequent radiological pattern.References:[1]Respirology, 21 (2016), pp. 245-258[2]Eur Respir J, 46 (2015), pp. 976-987Disclosure of Interests:Rafaela Ortega Castro: None declared, Pérez Sánchez Laura: None declared, Font Ugalde Pilar: None declared, Jerusalem Calvo Gutierrez: None declared, Antonio Requejo-Jimenez: None declared, Simona Espejo-Pérez: None declared, Teresa Gonzalez-Serrano: None declared, María del Carmen Castro Villegas: None declared, Gómez García Ignacio: None declared, Alejandro Escudero Contreras: None declared, Eduardo Collantes Estevez Grant/research support from: ROCHE and Pfizer, Speakers bureau: ROCHE, Lilly, Bristol and Celgene, Maria A Aguirre: None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000829
Author(s):  
Shaney L Barratt ◽  
Havra H Adamali ◽  
Caroline Cotton ◽  
Ben Mulhearn ◽  
Hina Iftikhar ◽  
...  

IntroductionAntisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) is a rare autoimmune connective tissue disease (CTD), associated with autoantibodies targeting tRNA synthetase enzymes, that can present to respiratory (interstitial lung disease (ILD)) or rheumatology (myositis, inflammatory arthritis and systemic features) services. The therapeutic management of CTD-associated ILD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) differs widely, thus accurate diagnosis is essential.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective, multicentre observational cohort study designed to (1) evaluate differences between ASyS-associated ILD with IPF, (2) phenotypic differences in patients with ASyS-ILD presenting to respiratory versus rheumatology services, (3) differences in outcomes between ASySassociated with Jo-1 versus non-Jo-1 autoantibodies and (4) compare long-term outcomes between these groups.ResultsWe identified 76 patients with ASyS-ILD and 78 with IPF. Patients with ASyS were younger at presentation (57 vs 77 years, p<0.001) with a female predominance (57% vs 33%, p=0.006) compared with IPF. Cytoplasmic staining on indirect immunofluorescence was a differentiating factor between ASyS and IPF (71% vs 0%, p<0.0001). Patients with ASyS presenting initially to respiratory services (n=52) had a higher prevalence of ASyS non-Jo-1 antibodies and significantly fewer musculoskeletal symptoms/biochemical evidence of myositis, compared with those presenting to rheumatology services (p<0.05), although lung physiology was similar in both groups. There were no differences in high-resolution CT appearances or outcomes in those with Jo-1 versus non-Jo-1 ASyS-ILD.ConclusionsExtended autoimmune serology is needed to evaluate for ASyS autoantibodies in patients presenting with ILD, particularly in younger female patients. Musculoskeletal involvement is common in ASyS (typically Jo-1 autoantibodies) presenting to rheumatology but the burden of ILD is similar to those presenting to respiratory medicine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document