scholarly journals Influence of organization structure on design and implementation of effective planning and control systems

1979 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
M. D. Groch

Aspects of organizational structure that influence the design and implementation of planning and control systems are discussed. The role of organization structure, planning systems and control systems in organizations is described, showing the interaction of each with the others. The spectrum of planning and control, in terms of Anthony's model, interfaces between organization structure, strategic planning, management control and operational control, as well as structural determinants of specialization, responsibility, management hierarchy, authority and financial systems are analysed, describing how each dictates in some way the nature of planning and control systems. Organizational growth and its effects on required changes to organizational structure and planning and control systems are described, and mention is made of the sterile nature of organization structure and planning and control systems and of the effects of human behaviour on organizational performance.Aspekte van organisasiestruktuur wat die ontwerp en implementering van beplanning- en beheersisteme bernvloed word bespreek. Die rol van organisasiestruktuur, beplanningsisteme en beheersisteme in organisasie en die onderlinge wisselwerking daarvan word aangetoon en die spektrum van beplanning en beheer word bespreek in terme van Anthony se model, met 'n ontleding van die koppelvlakke tussen organisasiestruktuur, strategiese beplanning, bestuursbeheer en bedryfsbeheer. Strukturele determinante van spesialisasie, verantwoordelikheid, bestuurshierargie, gesag en finansiele stelsels word ontleed en daar word beskryf hoe elk op een of ander manier die aard van beplanning- en beheersisteme voorskryf. Organisasie-groei, en die uitwerking daarvan op die nodige veranderinge in organisasiestruktuur en beplanning- en beheerstelsels word aangedui; en daar word kortliks op die steriele aard van organisasiestruktuur en beplanning- en beheerstelsels, sowel as die uitwerking van menslike gedrag op organlsasie-prestasie, gedui.

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Mie Reheul ◽  
Ann Jorissen

Purpose – Drawing on upper echelons theory, the purpose of this paper is to examine whether CEOs place their distinctive marks on the design of planning, control and evaluation systems (i.e. management control systems (MCS)) in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Design/methodology/approach – The authors use survey data from 189 Belgian SMEs and perform regression analyses to investigate the relation between the CEO demographics tenure, education and experience and various aspects of MCS design, controlling for the classical contingent variables. Findings – CEO tenure and education are related to evaluation system design, but there is no link between CEO demographics and planning and control system design. The lack of managerial discretion concerning planning and control systems could be explained by their more external and observable character, giving rise to pressures to comply with institutional norms (“good practices”). The presence of discretion concerning the design of evaluation systems could be due to their internal character. Practical implications – Since evaluation systems are an important determinant of work-related attitudes and can lead to dysfunctional behavior, it is important for company owners and board members to consider the demographics of present or new CEOs, and to understand the associated inclinations reflected in evaluation systems. Originality/value – The authors apply a more comprehensive approach than (the few) existing SME studies by relating a larger number of CEO demographics to a more comprehensive set of MCS elements, controlling for a larger group of contingent variables. Moreover, the authors fill gaps in the upper echelons and MCS literature.


2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nico P. Mol ◽  
Johan A.M. de Kruijf

This article investigates how and to what extent performance indicators in Dutch central government are actually embedded in performance management. In a case study encompassing 12 government organizations, the relevance of the indicators presented is analysed in three stages: (1) with respect to the responsibilities for results intended in performance measurement, (2) with respect to responsibilities actually implied in resource allocation and (3) with respect to responsibilities ultimately to be inferred from governance – planning and control – systems applied. In our research, management control systems appear to be only partially tuned to the performance indicators specified in advance. The familiar expression ‘What you measure is what you get’ is thereby invalidated by all kinds of restrictions imposed on a manager’s actual responsibility for measurement outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 745-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim K. Mohammed ◽  
Bayan S. Sharif ◽  
Jeffrey A. Neasham

Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahzaib Atif ◽  
Zarrar Haider ◽  
Malik Muhammad Zohaib ◽  
Mirza Ali Raza

2012 ◽  
Vol 193-194 ◽  
pp. 1257-1260
Author(s):  
Min Zhang

Various challenges should be considered in the development of an effective model for the planning and control of high-rise building construction. These challenges have been identified as results of the construction process. This paper discusses the engineering planning and management control in high-rise building construction. The methodology should also be able to address the concerns and considerations regularly faced in the industry and thus providing flexible modeling, which can be used by different levels of management


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-528
Author(s):  
Roxana Corduneanu ◽  
Laura Lebec

PurposeDrawing on Simons's levers of control (LoC) framework, the primary aim of this study is to advance an understanding of the balance between empowerment and constraint in a non-profit UK organisation. In particular, this study examines the antecedents and manifestations of LoC (im)balance, in relation to employees' level of engagement with the control systems in place.Design/methodology/approachFor this study, 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted with different organisational members, from directors to non-managerial staff, to gain an in-depth appreciation of the main differences between managerial intentions in the design of management control systems (MCS) and employee perceptions regarding the role of such systems.FindingsThis research reveals that suppression of interactive systems and internal inconsistencies between different types of controls hinder the balance between empowerment and constraint. This imbalance is then found to have important consequences for employee buy-in, in some cases, defeating the purposes of control.Research limitations/implicationsThis study enhances our understanding of the gap between the design of control systems and the employee perceptions of it in an unusual organisational setting (non-profit and bringing together clinical and non-clinical staff and operations).Originality/valueThe study of MCS and its role in organisations has long been the focus of both academic and practitioner research. Yet, while extant literature focused on management's perspective on MCS, few studies have explored employees' attitudes and behaviours that accompany the implementation of control. What is more, little is known about the specific uses and behavioural outcomes of MCS in the context of non-profit organisations. Drawing on Simons's LoC framework, this paper addresses these gaps in the literature and investigates the balance between control and empowerment of employees in a UK non-profit organisation with significant clinical remit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document