scholarly journals Granisetron versus ondansetron for post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis in elective craniotomies for brain tumors: A randomized controlled double-blind study

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayank Gupta ◽  
AnoopR Gogia ◽  
Priyanka Gupta ◽  
Nikki Sabharwal ◽  
Suniti Kale
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY OF PALONOSETRON COMPARED WITH ONDANSETRON IN PREVENTING POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY SURGERY.

2021 ◽  
pp. 72-74
Author(s):  
Anusha K ◽  
Sherin bright
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Radical Mastectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

BACKGROUND : Palonosetron is a new potent 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 antagonist. Although used for chemo induced emesis, data is lacking for PONV. The high incidence of nausea and vomiting after breast surgery is well documented. This study compared the effects of i.v.ondansetron and palonosetron administered at the time of induction for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in these high-risk patients . The aim was to compare Onda METHODS : nsetron 8 mg and Palonosetron 0.075mg administered intravenously for prevention of post operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing modied radical mastectomy 24 hours postoperatively, by a randomised , controlled, double blind study. 70 female non smoking patients scheduled for elective modied radical mastectomy were, allocated randomly into 2 groups . Patients received either Palonosetron 0.075mg (GROUP P ) or ondansetron 8mg ( GROUP O ) intravenously, immediately before induction of general anaesthesia. The occurence of nausea, vomiting, retching, need for rescue antiemetics and side effects were monitored for a period of 24 hours after surgery. The compete response rate and overall PONV for 0 - 24 hours were calculated. The demographic prole of the patients were comparable. The RESULTS : incidence of a complete response (no PONV, no rescue antiemetics ) during 0 - 24 hours in post operative period was signicantly high in GROUP P ( 85.7% vs 62.9%, p=0.02) than GROUP O. The incidence of nausea was signicantly low in GROUP P ( 14.3% vs 37.1%). There was no statistically signicant difference between the 2 groups in vomiting, retching, side effects and need for rescue antiemetics. Thus overall PONV was low in GROUP P (14.3% vs 37.1% p = 0.02 statistically signicant.) We conclude that Palonosetron 0.075mg was more effective for preventing PONV in patients undergoing modied radical mastectomy surgery

Prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting in children – a prospective randomized double-blind study

2008 ◽  
Vol 97 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Sakellaris ◽  
P Georgogianaki ◽  
E Astyrakaki ◽  
M Michalakis ◽  
O Dede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

scholarly journals Role of pre–extubation fentanyl in mastectomy: a randomized, controlled, double–blind study

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Salman ◽  
Norma Osama Zayed ◽  
Ahmed Mansour ◽  
Ramy Howaidi ◽  
Ahmed Gamaleldin Foly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Extubation Time ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Both tracheal intubation and extubation are associated with dangerous consequences such as tachycardia, hypertension, myocardial ischemia and arrhythmias. The aim was to evaluate pre–extubation two different doses of fentanyl on hemodynamic stabilization and delayed recovery in mastectomy. Methodology: The randomized controlled double–blind study was conducted on 126 patients aged 16–60 years, with controlled hypertension, receiving chemotherapy before surgery and underwent mastectomy for breast cancer. Patients were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups. Before extubation, patients received 10 ml saline in group (C), 1 µg/kg fentanyl in Group–F1: and 2 µg/kg fentanyl in Group–F2. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at T1 (after maintenance of anesthesia), T2 (after giving the test drug), T3 (immediately after extubation), T4 (5 min. after extubation) and T5 (15 min after extubation). Results: MAP was significantly lower in fentanyl groups compared to Group–C at T2 and T3 without significant deference between fentanyl groups. HR was significantly lower in fentanyl groups compared to Group–C and in Group–F2 compared to Group–F1 at T3, T4 and T5. Time of extubation was significantly prolonged in Group–F2 compared to Group–F1 and Group–C without a significant difference between Group–F1 and Group–C. Conclusions: Pre–extubation fentanyl 1 µg/kg blunted cardiovascular responses to extubation without respiratory depression or prolonged recovery. Pre–extubation fentanyl 2 µg/kg provide more control in HR but with delay in the extubation time compared to 1 µg/kg of fentanyl. Key words: Pre–Extubation, Fentanyl, Mastectomy, Hemodynamics, Recovery Preregistration: The study was registered in the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (approval number: 281) Citation: Salman A, Zayed NO, Mansour A, Howaidi R, Foly AG, ElSharkawy MS, Abdelgalil AS. Role of pre–extubation fentanyl in mastectomy: a randomized, controlled, double–blind study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(2):143-149. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i2.1462. Abbreviations: CST=Craniosacral therapy; SMT=Sensorimotor training; NCLBP=Nonspecific chronic low back pain; VAS=Visual analogue scale; ODI=Oswestry disability index, BDI-II=Beck depression inventory-II, and SF-36=Short Form-36; CSF=cerebral spinal fluid; CSS=craniosacral system; PRM=primary respiratory movements Received: 27 June 2020, Reviewed: 24 July 2020, Accepted: 27 July 2020

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document