scholarly journals Usefulness of medial temporal lobe atrophy visual rating scale in detecting Alzheimer′s disease: Preliminary study

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Hyeok Heo ◽  
Min-Ky Kim ◽  
Jun-Hyung Lee ◽  
Jeong-Heon Lee
2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-337
Author(s):  
Can Sheng ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Xiaoni Wang ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
...  

Background: Visual rating scales for medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) and posterior atrophy (PA) have been reported to be useful for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in routine clinical practice. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of combined MTA and PA visual rating scales to discriminate amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients from healthy controls. Methods: This study included T1-weighted MRI images from two different cohorts. In the first cohort, we recruited 73 patients with aMCI and 48 group-matched cognitively normal controls for training and validation. Visual assessments of MTA and PA were carried out for each participant. Global gray matter volume and density were estimated using voxel-based morphometry analysis as the objective reference. We investigated the discriminative power of a single visual rating scale and the combination of the MTA and PA rating scales for identifying aMCI. The second cohort, consisting of 33 aMCI patients and 45 controls, was used to verify the reliability of the visual assessments. Results: Compared with the single visual rating scale, the combination of the MTA and PA exhibited the best discriminative power, with an AUC of 0.818±0.041, which was similar to the diagnostic accuracy of the gray matter volumetric measures. The discriminative power of the combined MTA and PA was verified in the second cohort (AUC 0.824±0.058). Conclusion: The combined MTA and PA rating scales demonstrated practical diagnostic value for distinguishing aMCI patients from controls, suggesting its potential to serve as a convenient and reproducible method to assess the degree of atrophy in clinical settings.


2014 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Jae-Hyeok Heo ◽  
Soo-Ji Lee ◽  
Min-Ho Park ◽  
Sang-Soon Park ◽  
Jin-Young Ahn

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoki KANEKO ◽  
Kikuko KANEKO ◽  
Mina MATSUSHITA ◽  
Masumi KADOYA ◽  
Nobumaro IHARA ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. T318-T318
Author(s):  
Hyun Cho ◽  
Kwon Jee-Hyun ◽  
Hyun Jin Seo ◽  
Seung Ho Choi ◽  
Sung Yul Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Claes Håkansson ◽  
Ashkan Tamaddon ◽  
Henrik Andersson ◽  
Gustav Torisson ◽  
Gustav Mårtensson ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To assess inter-modality agreement and accuracy for medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) ratings across radiologists with varying clinical experience in a non-demented population. Methods Four raters (two junior radiologists and two senior neuroradiologists) rated MTA on CT and MRI scans using Scheltens’ MTA scale. Ratings were compared to a consensus rating by two experienced neuroradiologists for estimation of true positive and negative rates (TPR and TNR) and over- and underestimation of MTA. Inter-modality agreement expressed as Cohen’s κ (dichotomized data), Cohen’s κw, and two-way mixed, single measures, consistency ICC (ordinal data) were determined. Adequate agreement was defined as κ/κw ≥ 0.80 and ICC ≥ 0.80 (significance level at 95% CI ≥ 0.65). Results Forty-nine subjects (median age 72 years, 27% abnormal MTA) with cognitive impairment were included. Only junior radiologists achieved adequate agreement expressed as Cohen’s κ. All raters achieved adequate agreement expressed as Cohen’s κw and ICC. True positive rates varied from 69 to 100% and TNR varied from 85 to 100%. No under- or overestimation of MTA was observed. Ratings did not differ between radiologists. Conclusion We conclude that radiologists with varying experience achieve adequate inter-modality agreement and similar accuracy when Scheltens’ MTA scale is used to rate MTA on a non-demented population. However, TPR varied between radiologists which could be attributed to rating style differences. Key Points • Radiologists with varying experience achieve adequate inter-modality agreement with similar accuracy when Scheltens’ MTA scale is used to rate MTA on a non-demented population. • Differences in rating styles might affect accuracy, this was most evident for senior neuroradiologists, and only junior radiologists achieved adequate agreement on dichotomized (abnormal/normal) ratings. • The use of an MTA scale template might compensate for varying clinical experience which could make it applicable for clinical use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document