scholarly journals Effects of endometrial stimulation timings and techniques on pregnancy outcomes in patients without prior embryo transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Jun Zhai ◽  
Yu-Rong Cao ◽  
Hao Shi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis

Pregnancy outcomes after day 5 versus day 6 blastocyst‐stage embryo transfer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi‐xin Li ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
Tian‐ze Sun ◽  
Mo‐qi Lv ◽  
Pan Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
Stage Embryo

scholarly journals The Developmental Stage at Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer

To date, there is no consensus in embryo developmental stages for cryopreservation. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of embryo developmental stages at cryopreservation on pregnancy outcomes of frozen embryo transfer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies identified through MEDLINE literature search was performed. The primary outcome was live birth/delivery rate, and the secondary outcomes included implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. The protocol of this systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO 2017 (registration number: CRD42017072828). Five studies met the eligibility criteria were included in the present review. The outcomes of embryos frozen at different stages but transferred at the same stage were analyzed and compared. Embryos frozen at non-blastocyst showed a significant higher delivery/live birth rate than those cryopreserved at blastocyst (odds ratio=1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.66) in the setting of frozen embryo transfer with blastocysts. There was only a limited number of studies with analyzable data for comparisons. The literature varied substantially in study design and methodology applied. Although a significant difference was observed toward an improved delivery/live birth rate for blastocyst transfer with embryos frozen at non-blastocyst stage, future studies are required to further corroborate this finding.

scholarly journals Association between abnormal body mass index and pregnancy outcomes in patients following frozen embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaqi Yang ◽  
Yichen He ◽  
Yiqing Wu ◽  
Dan Zhang ◽  
Hefeng Huang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Low Bmi ◽  
High Bmi

Abstract Background There has been increasing interest in the relationship between body mass index(BMI) and pregnancy outcomes, especially in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer(FET). Several observational studies have been published, but so far with conflicting results. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrails.gov and Web of Science databases were searched based on established search strategy from inception through January 2021. Results Twelve studies were eligible. In women following FET, high BMI (BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2) was associated with an impaired live birth rate (LBR, OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82–0.96, P = 0.002), but wasn’t associated with the implantation rate or the clinical pregnancy rate. Subgroup analysis revealed higher LBR for women didn’t complicated by polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS, OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85–1.08, P = 0.46) and women with blastocyst transferred (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.68–1.16, P = 0.40). LBR did not differ between the low BMI group (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) and the normal weight group. Conclusions Our study showed that high BMI in women is negatively associated with LBR in FET cycles, whereas low BMI isn’t. The results of subgroup analysis implied a need for women with a high BMI to get individualized weight management and treatment. Further evidence is still required to optimize preconception health and develop Nutritional and exercise guidelines.

scholarly journals Levothyroxine and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with subclinical hypothyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Bein ◽  
Oriana Hoi Yun Yu ◽  
Sonia Marzia Grandi ◽  
Francesca Y. E. Frati ◽  
Ihab Kandil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Subclinical Hypothyroidism ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Neonatal Death ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Levothyroxine Treatment

Abstract Background Levothyroxine replacement therapy may decrease the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH). The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the risk of adverse pregnancy, perinatal, and early childhood outcomes among women with SCH treated with levothyroxine. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, Pubmed (non-Medline), Ebsco-CINAHL Plus with full text and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and observational studies examining the association between treatment of SCH during pregnancy and our outcomes of interest were included. Studies that compared levothyroxine treatment versus no treatment were eligible for inclusion. Data from included studies were extracted and quality assessment was performed by two independent reviewers. Results Seven RCTs and six observational studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 7342 individuals were included in these studies. RCTs demonstrated several sources of bias, with lack of blinding of the participants or research personnel; only one study was fully blinded. In the observational studies, there was moderate to serious risk of bias due to lack of adjustment for certain confounding variables, participant selection, and selective reporting of results. Pooled analyses showed decreased risk of pregnancy loss (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.93) and neonatal death (RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.72) associated with levothyroxine treatment during pregnancy among women with SCH. There were no associations between levothyroxine treatment and outcomes during labour and delivery, or cognitive status in children at 3 or 5 years of age. Conclusion Treatment of SCH with levothyroxine during pregnancy is associated with decreased risks of pregnancy loss and neonatal death. Given the paucity of available data and heterogeneity of included studies, additional studies are needed to address the benefits of levothyroxine use among pregnant women with SCH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document