scholarly journals Current Concepts and Occurrence of Epithelial Odontogenic Tumors: II. Calcifying Epithelial Odontogenic Tumor Versus Ghost Cell Odontogenic Tumors Derived from Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suk Keun Lee ◽  
Yeon Sook Kim
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Regrina Setiawan ◽  
Ria Noerianingsih Firman ◽  
Lusi Epsilawati

Objectives: This review article is aimed to describe the radiographic features of CEOT and COC to determine the differences between the two lesions on panoramic radiographs. Review: This research is a descriptive study using scoping review method based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis for Scoping Review (PRISMA-Scr). This study examines English and Indonesian articles of CEOT and COC with panoramic radiography as a diagnostic tool published in 2015 – 2021. Relevant articles were obtained from searches using keywords and inclusion criteria on PubMed, PMC NCBI, and hand searching techniques. A total of 32 articles were identified at initial study identification. Duplication, title and abstract, and full-text inspection consecutively excluded 1, 3, and 8 articles. A total of 20 eligible articles were included in this study, 10 cases of Calcifying Epithelial Odontogenic Tumor and 10 cases of Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst. Conclusion: The differences between COC and CEOT on panoramic radiographs are COC is more commonly found in the anterior region than CEOT and COC tends to occur in the periapical or lateral part of adjacent teeth and causes root resorption, whereas CEOT tends to be located at the crown of impacted teeth. There aren’t any pathognomonic radiographic findings from the CEOT and COC, so a definitive diagnosis still requires histopathological analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-209
Author(s):  
Jayarathi Ishwarya K S ◽  
V. Ramesh ◽  
P. D. Balamurali ◽  
Karthikshree V Prashad

Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT) is a rare benign neoplasia, locally aggressive, that tends to invade bone and adjacent soft tissues. CEOT accounts for less than 1% of all odontogenic tumors. This article reports two cases of CEOT with different mode of presentation clinically, radiologically and histologically.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 526-535
Author(s):  
José Alcides Almeida de Arruda ◽  
Diego Antônio Costa Arantes ◽  
Lauren Frenzel Schuch ◽  
Carla Mosconi ◽  
Lucas Guimarães Abreu ◽  
...  

A clear cell variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor is a rare benign odontogenic neoplasm, accounting for 33 cases described in the literature. In this article, we report a challenging example of clear cell variant of calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor of the posterior maxilla in a 45-year-old female patient showing locally aggressive growth and recurrence. Microscopically, islands of polyhedral cells containing abundant cytoplasm, well-developed intercellular bridges blended with clear cells were observed. The nuclei were frequently pleomorphic and permeated by hyaline calcified material. Immunohistochemistry revealed positivity for pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3), cytokeratins (CK-14 and CK-19), Bcl-2, p53, and p63. The Ki-67 proliferative index was ~10%. As odontogenic tumors are rare, when a significant clear cell component is observed, the differential diagnosis with other lesions of the jaws with similar morphology, including other odontogenic tumors with prominent clear cell component, clear cell odontogenic carcinomas, and metastatic tumors, is difficult.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satya Ranjan Misra ◽  
Sthitaprajna Lenka ◽  
Sujit Ranjan Sahoo ◽  
Sobhan Mishra

Odontogenic tumors develop in the jaws from odontogenic tissues such as enamel organ, Hertwig epithelial root sheath, dental lamina, and so on. A variety of tumors unique to the maxilla and mandible are therefore seen. Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor (CEOT) is a rare, aggressive, benign odontogenic tumor of epithelial origin accounting for only about 1% of all odontogenic tumors. It is eponymously called “Pindborg tumor”, as it was first described by Pindborg in 1955. The origin of this locally invasive tumor remains unknown. It is thought to arise from stratum intermedium. It commonly affects the posterior mandible manifesting as a slow-growing asymptomatic swelling often associated with an impacted tooth. We report a case of CEOT, for which, owing to its huge size we have proposed the term “giant” Pindborg tumor (CEOT). This is probably the largest case of this tumor reported so far in the English literature. The present case also has the classic yet rare “driven snow” appearance of the tumor on radiographs.


1982 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Leipzig ◽  
Pak C. Yau

Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor, or Pindborg tumor, is the rarest of odontogenic tumors of the mandible. The tumor is distinct from ameloblastoma histologically, as well as by its less aggressive clinical behavior. Treatment must consist of complete excision—to include a rim of bone surrounding the lesion—to prevent recurrence. No instance of metastasis from this neoplasm has been reported.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Shan Nawaz Malik ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam ◽  
Mariyam Shahina ◽  
Salman Siddique ◽  
Vishnu Das Prabhu

Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor is a rare benign epithelial odontogenic lesion that comprises from 0.2% to 1.1 of all odontogenic tumors. In the past a number of different names have been given to this lesion, such as calcifying ameloblastoma, cystic complex odontoma, uncommon ameloblastoma with calcifications and others. There is a need to study and explore various aspects of this tumour, this article gives a broad idea of the various aspects of this tumor and which aspect of this tumour needs more investigation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v13i1.17378 Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol. 13 No. 01 January2014: 14-19


Oral Oncology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adalberto Mosqueda-Taylor ◽  
Roman Carlos-Bregni ◽  
Constantino Ledesma-Montes ◽  
Reneé Zon Fillipi ◽  
Oslei Paes de Almeida ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Sonone ◽  
V. S. Sabane ◽  
Rajeev Desai

The calcifying ghost cell odontogenic cyst (CGCOC) was first described by Gorlin et al. in 1962. Calcifying ghost cell odontogenic cyst is comparatively rare in occurrence, constituting about 0.37% to 2.1% of all odontogenic tumors. The most notable features of this pathologic entity are histopathological features which include a cystic lining demonstrating characteristic “Ghost” epithelial cells with a propensity to calcify. In addition, the CGCOC may be associated with other recognized odontogenic tumors, most commonly odontomas. There are variants of CGCOC according to clinical, histopathological, and radiological characteristics. Therefore a proper categorization of the cases is needed for better understanding of the pathogenesis of each variant. Here, we report a classical case of calcifying odontogenic cyst along with a brief review of literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document