The Multi‐Channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) Method as a Tool for Ground Improvement Certification

Author(s):  
Robert W. Burke ◽  
Nick B. Schofield
2019 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 03006
Author(s):  
Nwai Le Ngal ◽  
Subagyo Pramumijoyo ◽  
Iman Satyarno ◽  
Kirbani Sri Brotopuspito ◽  
Junji Kiyono ◽  
...  

On May 27th 2006, Yogyakarta earthquake happened with 6.3 Mw. It was causing widespread destruction and loss of life and property. The average shear wave velocity to 30 m (Vs30) is useful parameter for classifying sites to predict their potential to amplify seismic shaking (Boore, 2004) [1]. Shear wave velocity is one of the most influential factors of the ground motion. The average shear wave velocity for the top 30 m of soil is referred to as Vs30. In this study, the Vs30 values were calculated by using multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method. The Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) method was introduced by Park et al. (1999). Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) is non-invasive method of estimating the shear-wave velocity profile. It utilizes the dispersive properties of Rayleigh waves for imaging the subsurface layers. MASW surveys can be divided into active and passive surveys. In active MASW method, surface waves can be easily generated by an impulsive source like a hammer, sledge hammer, weight drops, accelerated weight drops and explosive. Seismic measurements were carried out 44 locations in Yogyakarta province, in Indonesia. The dispersion data of the recorded Rayleigh waves were processed by using Seisimager software to obtain shear wave velocity profiles of the studied area. The average shear wave velocities of the soil obtained are ranging from 200 ms-1 to 988 ms-1, respectively.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. T287-T298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian Ivanov ◽  
Richard D. Miller ◽  
Daniel Feigenbaum ◽  
Sarah L. C. Morton ◽  
Shelby L. Peterie ◽  
...  

Shear-wave velocities were estimated at a levee site by inverting Love waves using the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) method augmented with the high-resolution linear Radon transform (HRLRT). The selected site was one of five levee sites in southern Texas chosen for the evaluation of several seismic data-analysis techniques readily available in 2004. The methods included P- and S-wave refraction tomography, Rayleigh- and Love-wave surface-wave analysis using MASW, and P- and S-wave cross-levee tomography. The results from the 2004 analysis revealed that although the P-wave methods provided reasonable and stable results, the S-wave methods produced surprisingly inconsistent shear-wave velocity [Formula: see text] estimates and trends compared with previous studies and borehole investigations. In addition, the Rayleigh-wave MASW method was nearly useless within the levee due to the sparsity of high frequencies in fundamental-mode surface waves and complexities associated with inverting higher modes. This prevented any reliable [Formula: see text] estimates for the levee core. Recent advances in methodology, such as the HRLRT for obtaining higher resolution dispersion-curve images with the MASW method and the use of Love-wave inversion routines specific to Love waves as part of the MASW method, provided the motivation to extend the 2004 original study by using horizontal-component seismic data for characterizing the geologic properties of levees. Contributions from the above-mentioned techniques were instrumental in obtaining [Formula: see text] estimates from within these levees that were very comparable with the measured borehole samples. A Love-wave approach can be a viable alternative to Rayleigh-wave MASW surveys at sites where complications associated with material or levee geometries inhibit reliable [Formula: see text] results from Rayleigh waves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document