scholarly journals Successful Remission of Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome during the Third-line Weekly Gemcitabine for Metastatic Breast Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. BCBCR.S14920
Author(s):  
Victor C. Kok ◽  
Sheng-Chung Wu ◽  
Chien-Kuang Lee
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Peripheral Blood Smear ◽  
Uremic Syndrome ◽  
Third Line

Sequential palliative chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer incorporating weekly gemcitabine administered as three-weeks-on, one-week-off schedule is widely adopted throughout the East Asia region. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) associated with weekly gemcitabine for a breast cancer patient is extremely rare. We report here a case of 43-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer who received weekly gemcitabine as a third-line palliative chemotherapy for her disease. She developed HUS after a cumulative dose of 11,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine, evidenced by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) with schistocytes seen in peripheral blood smear, decreased haptoglobin level (<0.29 mmol/L), thrombocytopenia, negative direct Coombs test, and acute kidney injury. Owing to the ease of administration of weekly gemcitabine, gemcitabine-induced thrombocytopenia, multifactorial anemia in metastatic breast cancer, and possibility of cancer progression, HUS could have gone unnoticed. Breast cancer oncologist should be cognizant of this rare HUS even during weekly gemcitabine treatment.

scholarly journals Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Eribulin Mesylate as a Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Spain: Management in the Later Line of Therapy

10.36469/9834 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-193
Author(s):  
Gabriel Tremblay ◽  
Unnati Majethia ◽  
Ilias Kontoudis ◽  
Jesús De Rosendo
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Third Line Treatment

Background: Two thirds (62%) of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in Western Europe have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease, for which anthracyclines and taxanes are recommended as first-line treatments, followed by microtubule-targeting agents such as capecitabine, vinorelbine and/or eribulin. The study objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of eribulin in Spain as a second-line treatment for HER2-negative MBC with its current status as a third-line treatment for patients who have received capecitabine. Methods: A Markov model was developed from the perspective of the Spanish healthcare system. The model had three health states: Stable; Progression and Death. In Stable, patients received eribulin or: capecitabine and vinorelbine for HER2-negative patients; primary treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) for post-capecitabine patients. In Progression, all patients received secondary TPC. Model inputs were overall survival, progression-free survival and costs relating to chemotherapies, grade 3/4 adverse events and healthcare utilization. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify uncertainty. Results: As second-line treatment, Eribulin was associated with a greater incremental benefit in life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than capecitabine and vinorelbine. Erubilin as third-line treatment was associated with greater benefit in life years (LYs) and QALYs than TPC. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for eribulin were higher in the second-line than the third-line setting in terms of LYs (€35,149 versus €24,884) and QALYs (€37,152 versus €35,484). In both settings, deterministic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER is most sensitive to the eribulin price. Conclusion: Eribulin is cost-effective as second-line treatment for HER2-negative MBC patients in Spain; albeit, slightly less so than as third-line treatment for MBC patients who have received capecitabine (an ICER per QALY difference of €1,668). This difference may fall within the margin of error for the model and could potentially be addressed by a minor reduction in the eribulin price.

scholarly journals A Model of Dormant-Emergent Metastatic Breast Cancer Progression Enabling Exploration of Biomarker Signatures

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda M. Clark ◽  
Manu P. Kumar ◽  
Sarah E. Wheeler ◽  
Carissa L. Young ◽  
Raman Venkataramanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Progression

scholarly journals Locoregional Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Do Concomitant Metabolic Aspects Have a Role on the Management and Prognosis in this Setting?

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 227
Author(s):  
Maria Ida Amabile ◽  
Federico Frusone ◽  
Alessandro De Luca ◽  
Domenico Tripodi ◽  
Giovanni Imbimbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Although they cannot be considered curative, the new therapeutic integrated advances in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have substantially improved patient outcomes. Traditionally, surgery was confined to palliation of symptomatic or ulcerating lumps. Data suggest, in some cases, a possible additive role for more aggressive locoregional surgical therapy in combination with systemic treatments in the metastatic setting, although a low level of evidence has been shown in terms of improvement in overall survival in MBC patients treated with surgery and medical treatment compared to medical treatment alone. In this light, tumor heterogeneity remains a challenge. To effectively reshape the therapeutic approach to MBC, careful consideration of who is a good candidate for locoregional resection is paramount. The patient’s global health condition, impacting on cancer progression and morbidity and their associated molecular targets, have to be considered in treatment decision-making. In particular, more recently, research has been focused on the role of metabolic derangements, including the presence of metabolic syndrome, which represent well-known conditions related to breast cancer recurrence and distant metastasis and are, therefore, involved in the prognosis. In the present article, we focus on locoregional surgical strategies in MBC and whether concomitant metabolic derangements may have a role in prognosis.

High-Dose Megestrol Acetate as Third-Line Endocrine Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer

Oncology ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Julia M. Cruz ◽  
Hyman B. Muss ◽  
Gregory Russell
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Megestrol Acetate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Third Line

Renal toxicity with liposomal doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1738-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristyn E Yemm ◽  
Laura M Alwan ◽  
A Bilal Malik ◽  
Lupe G Salazar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Renal Toxicity ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Infusion Reactions ◽  
Cancer Setting ◽  
Cessation Of Treatment

There is no preferred treatment option for metastatic breast cancer; therefore, treatment should provide palliation, prolong survival, control symptoms, and improve quality of life. Liposomal doxorubicin formulations have been shown to have less alopecia, nausea, vomiting, and myelosuppression than traditional doxorubicin, but more skin toxicities and infusion reactions. Prolonged use of liposomal doxorubicin may be associated with unrecognized or less well-defined toxicities. We report a case of acute kidney injury and progressively worsening chronic kidney disease necessitating dialysis in a patient who received prolonged therapy with liposomal doxorubicin for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This case report should give caution to providers considering prolonged use of liposomal doxorubicin in the metastatic breast cancer setting as we observed sustained renal toxicity, long past the cessation of treatment.

Cisplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 1811-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
G W Sledge ◽  
P J Loehrer ◽  
B J Roth ◽  
L H Einhorn
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
The United States ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Third Line

Cisplatin has had only minimal activity when used as second- and third-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). There have been no phase II studies in the United States evaluating cisplatin in patients with MBC with no prior chemotherapy. We therefore treated 20 consecutive patients with cisplatin 30 mg/m2/d for four days every 3 weeks for a maximum of six courses. We obtained partial responses in nine of 19 evaluable patients (47%), with responses in liver, lung, and soft tissue indicator lesions. Our data suggest that cisplatin has substantial single-agent activity as front-line therapy in MBC, and should be considered for inclusion in first-line combination chemotherapy regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document