scholarly journals The Volume Regulation Graph versus the Ejection Fraction as Metrics of Left Ventricular Performance in Heart Failure with and without a Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Mathematical Model Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 9s1 ◽  
pp. CMC.S18748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo J.C. Faes ◽  
Peter L.M. Kerkhof
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Ventricular Volume ◽  
Systemic Circulation ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Performance ◽  
End Diastolic Volume

In left ventricular heart failure, often a distinction is made between patients with a reduced and a preserved ejection fraction (EF). As EF is a composite metric of both the end-diastolic volume (EDV) and the end-systolic ventricular volume (ESV), the lucidity of the EF is sometimes questioned. As an alternative, the ESV–EDV graph is advocated. This study identifies the dependence of the EF and the EDV–ESV graph on the major determinants of ventricular performance. Numerical simulations were made using a model of the systemic circulation, consisting of an atrium–ventricle valves combination; a simple constant pressure as venous filling system; and a three-element Windkessel extended with a venous system. ESV–EDV graphs and EFs were calculated using this model while varying one by one the filling pressure, diastolic and systolic ventricular elastances, and diastolic pressure in the aorta. In conclusion, the ESV–EDV graph separates between diastolic and systolic dysfunction while the EF encompasses these two pathologies. Therefore, the ESV–EDV graph can provide an advantage over EF in heart failure studies.

scholarly journals Sustained Improvement in Diastolic Reserve Following Percutaneous Pericardiotomy in a Porcine Model of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Charles Jain ◽  
Dawn Pedrotty ◽  
Philip A. Araoz ◽  
Alan Sugrue ◽  
Vaibhav R. Vaidya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Porcine Model ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Swine Model ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Volume Loading

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is increasing in prevalence, but few effective treatments are available. Elevated left ventricular (LV) diastolic filling pressures represent a key therapeutic target. Pericardial restraint contributes to elevated LV end-diastolic pressure, and acute studies have shown that pericardiotomy attenuates the rise in LV end-diastolic pressure with volume loading. However, whether these acute effects are sustained chronically remains unknown. Methods: Minimally invasive pericardiotomy was performed percutaneously using a novel device in a porcine model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Hemodynamics were assessed at baseline and following volume loading with pericardium intact, acutely following pericardiotomy, and then again chronically after 4 weeks. Cardiac structure was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Results: The increase in LV end-diastolic pressure with volume loading was mitigated by 41% (95% CI, 27%–45%, P <0.0001; ΔLV end-diastolic pressure reduced from +9±3 mm Hg to +5±3 mm Hg, P =0.0003, 95% CI, −2.2 to −5.5). The effect was sustained at 4 weeks (+5±2 mm Hg, P =0.28 versus acute). There was no statistically significant effect of pericardiotomy on ventricular remodeling compared with age-matched controls. None of the animals developed hemodynamic or pathological indicators of pericardial constriction or frank systolic dysfunction. Conclusions: The acute hemodynamic benefits of pericardiotomy are sustained for at least 4 weeks in a swine model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, without excessive chamber remodeling, pericarditis, or clinically significant systolic dysfunction. These data support trials evaluating minimally invasive pericardiotomy as a novel treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in humans.

scholarly journals Central and obstructive apneas prevalence in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Borrelli ◽  
P Sciarrone ◽  
F Gentile ◽  
N Ghionzoli ◽  
G Mirizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
2D Echocardiography

Abstract Background Central apneas (CA) and obstructive apneas (OA) are highly prevalent in heart failure (HF) both with reduced and preserved systolic function. However, a comprehensive evaluation of apnea prevalence across HF according to ejection fraction (i.e HF with patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction- HFrEf, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively) throughout the 24 hours has never been done before. Materials and methods 700 HF patients were prospectively enrolled and then divided according to left ventricular EF (408 HFrEF, 117 HFmrEF, 175 HFpEF). All patients underwent a thorough evaluation including: 2D echocardiography; 24-h Holter-ECG monitoring; cardiopulmonary exercise testing; neuro-hormonal assessment and 24-h cardiorespiratory monitoring. Results In the whole population, prevalence of normal breathing (NB), CA and OA at daytime was 40%, 51%, and 9%, respectively, while at nighttime 15%, 55%, and 30%, respectively. When stratified according to left ventricular EF, CA prevalence decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF and HFpEF: (daytime CA: 57% vs. 43% vs. 42%, respectively, p=0.001; nighttime CA: 66% vs. 48% vs. 34%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001), while OA prevalence increased (daytime OA: 5% vs. 8% vs. 18%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001; nighttime OA: 20 vs. 29 vs. 53%, respectively, p&lt;0.0001). When assessing moderte-severe apneas, defined with an apnea/hypopnea index &gt;15 events/hour, prevalence of CA was again higher in HFrEF than HFmrEF and HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe CA: 28% vs. 19% and 23%, respectively, p&lt;0.05) and at nighttime (nighttime moderate-severe CA: 50% vs. 39% and 28%, respectively, p&lt;0.05). Conversely, moderate-severe OA decreased from HFrEF to HFmrEF to HFpEF both at daytime (daytime moderate-severe OA: 1% vs. 3% and 8%, respectively, p&lt;0.05) and nighttime (noghttime moderate-severe OA: 10% vs. 11% and 30%, respectively, p&lt;0.05). Conclusions Daytime and nighttime apneas, both central and obstructive in nature, are highly prevalent in HF regardless of EF. Across the whole spectrum of HF, CA prevalence increases and OA decreases as left ventricular systolic dysfunction progresses, both during daytime and nighttime. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Significance of the echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial myocardial strain for early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
E. K. Serezhina ◽  
A. G. Obrezan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Myocardial Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Myocardial Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Echocardiographic Evaluation

This systematic review is based on 19 studies from Elsevier, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, which were found by the following keywords: LA strain (left atrial strain), STE (speckle tracking echocardiography), HF (heart failure), and HFpEF (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction). The review focuses on results and conclusions of studies on using the 2D echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial (LA) myocardial strain for early diagnosis of HFpEF in routine clinical practice. Analysis of the studies included into this review showed a significant decline of all LA functions in patients with HFpEF. Also, multiple studies have reported associations between decreased indexes of LA strain and old age, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction, and LV diastolic dysfunction. Thus, the review indicates significant possibilities of using indexes of LA strain in evaluation of early stages of both systolic and diastolic myocardial dysfunction. Notably, LA functional systolic and diastolic indexes are not sufficiently studied despite their growing significance for diagnosis and prognosis of patients with HFpEF. For this reason, in addition to existing models for risk stratification in this disease, including clinical characteristics and/or echocardiographic data, future studies should focus on these parameters. 

scholarly journals Preload-corrected dynamic Starling mechanism in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michinari Hieda ◽  
Erin Howden ◽  
Shigeki Shibata ◽  
Takashi Tarumi ◽  
Justin Lawley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Dynamic Modulation ◽  
Power Spectral ◽  
Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

The beat-to-beat dynamic Starling mechanism (DSM), the dynamic modulation of stroke volume (SV) because of breath-by-breath changes in left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), reflects ventricular-arterial coupling. The purpose of this study was to test whether the LVEDP-SV relationship remained impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients after normalization of LVEDP. Right heart catheterization and model-flow analysis of the arterial pressure waveform were performed while preload was manipulated using lower-body negative pressure to alter LVEDP. The DSM was compared at similar levels of LVEDP between HFpEF patients ( n = 10) and age-matched healthy controls ( n = 12) (HFpEF vs. controls: 10.9 ± 3.8 vs. 11.2 ± 1.3 mmHg, P = 1.00). Transfer function analysis between diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAD) representing dynamic changes in LVEDP vs. SV index was applied to obtain gain and coherence of the DSM. The DSM gain was significantly lower in HFpEF patients than in the controls, even at a similar level of LVEDP (0.46 ± 0.19 vs. 0.99 ± 0.39 ml·m−2·mmHg−1, P = 0.0018). Moreover, the power spectral density of PAD, the input variability, was greater in the HFpEF group than the controls (0.75 ± 0.38 vs. 0.28 ± 0.26 mmHg2, P = 0.01). Conversely, the power spectral density of SV index, the output variability, was not different between the groups ( P = 0.97). There was no difference in the coherence, which confirms the reliability of the linear transfer function between the two groups (0.71 ± 0.13 vs. 0.77 ± 0.19, P = 0.87). The DSM gain in HFpEF patients is impaired compared with age-matched controls even at a similar level of LVEDP, which may reflect intrinsic LV diastolic dysfunction and incompetence of ventricular-arterial coupling. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The beat-to-beat dynamic Starling mechanism (DSM), the dynamic modulation of stroke volume because of breath-by-breath changes in left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), reflects ventricular-arterial coupling. Although the DSM gain is impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients, it is not clear whether this is because of higher LVEDP or left-ventricular diastolic dysfunction. The DSM gain in HFpEF patients is severely impaired, even at a similar level of LVEDP, which may reflect intrinsic left-ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Abstract 15172: Murf1 Inhibitor Embl205 is a New Approach for Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in an Animal Model

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anett Jannasch ◽  
Antje Schauer ◽  
Virginia Kirchhoff ◽  
Runa Draskowsi ◽  
Claudia Dittfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Atrophy ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Peak Gradient

Background: The novel MuRF1 inhibitor EMBL205 attenuates effectively developing skeletal muscle atrophy and dysfunction in animals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, ZSF1 rat model). The impact of EMBL205 on myocardial function in the HFpEF setting is currently unknown and was evaluated in ZSF1 rats. Methods: 20 wks-old female obese ZSF1 rats received EMBL205 (12 wks, conc. of 0.1% in chow; HFpEF-EMBL205). Age-matched untreated lean (con) and obese (HFpEF) ZSF1 rats served as controls. At 32 wks of age left ventricular (LV)-, aortic valve (AV) function and LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was determined by echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic measurements. LV expression of collagen 1A (Col1A) and 3A (Col3A) was assessed by qRT-PCR, MMP2 expression was obtained by zymography and perivascular fibrosis was quantified in histological sections. Results: Development of HFpEF in ZSF1 obese animals is associated with cardiac enlargement and hypertrophy, as evident by increased myocardial weight, an increase in end diastolic volume (EDV) and LV anterior and posterior wall diameters. Diastolic LV-function is disturbed with elevation of E/é, an increased LVEDP and a preserved LV ejection fraction. AV peak velocity and peak gradient are significantly increased and AV opening area (AVA) significantly decreased. Col1A and Col3A expression are increased in HFpEF animals. EMBL205 treatment results in a significant reduction of myocardial weight and a trend towards lower EDV compared to HFpEF group. EMBL205 attenuates the increase in E/é, LVEDP, AV peak gradient and the decrease of AVA. EMBL205 significantly reduces Col3A expression and a trend for Col1A expression is seen. Increased perivascular fibrosis and MMP2 expression in HFpEF is extenuated by EMBL205 treatment (table 1). Conclusions: Application of EMBL205 attenuated the development of pathological myocardial alterations associated with HFpEF in ZSF1rats due to antifibrotic effects.

scholarly journals Left ventricular longitudinal systolic dysfunction is associated with right atrial dyssynchrony in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibadete Bytyçi ◽  
Edmond Haliti ◽  
Gëzim Berisha ◽  
Arbërie Tishukaj ◽  
Faik Shatri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

Abstract 5882: Myocardial Contractile Dysfunction in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry A Borlaug ◽  
Carolyn S Lam ◽  
Veronique Roger ◽  
Richard J Rodeheffer ◽  
Margaret M Redfield
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Myocardial Contractility ◽  
Ventricular Remodeling ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Wall Stress ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Background Patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have diastolic dysfunction, but are traditionally considered to have normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function. However, ventricular remodeling can result in preservation of EF despite abnormal myocardial contractility. Methods We performed echo-Doppler characterization of LV chamber and myocardial systolic properties in a population-based study, comparing patients with HFpEF (N=244) to healthy controls (CON, N=617), and hypertensives without HF (HTN, N=719), then examined long term outcome. Results All subjects had a normal EF (>50%). However, systolic chamber function, measured by wall stress-corrected endocardial fractional shortening (sc-eFS), was impaired in HFpEF (96±12%) compared to both CON (100±8%, p<0.0001) and HTN (108±11%, p<0.0001). Myocardial contractility, assessed by wall stress-corrected midwall shortening (sc-mFS), was also reduced in HFpEF (91±13%) compared to CON (100±10%, p<0.0001) and HTN (105±12%, p<0.0001). HTN had increased sc-eFS and sc-mFS compared with both HFpEF and CON (p<0.0001). In HFpEF, impaired sc-mFS was associated with increased mortality, independent of age (Figure ), while EF and sc- eFS were not. Conclusions Despite preservation of EF, unselected HFpEF patients from the community have significantly impaired systolic chamber function and depressed myocardial contractility. Abnormal myocardial contractility in HFpEF is associated with increased mortality. These data suggest that myocardial systolic dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of HFpEF and may represent a potential therapeutic target.

Abstract 12325: Compensatory Increase of Left Atrial External Work to Left Ventricular Dysfunction During Afterload Increase: Insights Into the Mechanism of Decompensation in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuji Inoue ◽  
Toshihiko Asanuma ◽  
Kasumi Masuda ◽  
Daisuke Sakurai ◽  
Masamichi Oka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Strain Curve ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
External Work ◽  
Reservoir Function ◽  
Left Pulmonary Vein

Introduction: Afterload mismatch is considered as a cause of acute decompensation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). However, behaviors of left atrium (LA) and ventricle (LV) to afterload increase have not been fully elucidated. We investigated how LA and LV acted to acute increase in afterload using speckle tracking echocardiography. Methods: Serial echocardiographic and hemodynamic data were acquired in 10 dogs during banding of the descending aorta (AoB). LA pressure was measured by a micromanometer via left pulmonary vein. As shown in Figure, peak negative strain during LA contraction and strain change during LA relaxation (early reservoir strain) and that during systole (late reservoir strain) were generated by simultaneous acquisition of LA longitudinal strain and volume. Pressure-strain curve showed 2 loops (A-loop, V-loop) and areas in A-loop and V-loop were computed as the work during active contraction and relaxation (A-work) and that during passive filling and emptying (V-work), respectively. Results: AoB increased LV systolic pressure by about 60 mmHg, mean LA pressure (3.8±1.3 vs. 7.1±2.0 mmHg) and LV end-diastolic pressure (4.5±1.7 vs. 10.7±4.0 mmHg, all p < 0.01). LV global circumferential strain decreased (-18.8±3.5 vs. -13.2±3.5%, p < 0.01) but LV stroke volume was maintained (8.4±2.3 vs. 9.6±3.6 ml). LA peak negative strain (-2.9±2.3 vs. -9.8±4.0%, p < 0.01) and early reservoir strain (3.4±1.1 vs. 7.8±2.6%, p < 0.01) increased substantially by AoB, but late reservoir function did not change (9.3±3.5 vs. 6.1±2.0%). A-work significantly increased (3.2±2.0 to 19.2±15.1 mmHg %, p < 0.01), while V-work did not change (13.3±7.1 vs. 13.6±8.0 mmHg %). Conclusions: During aortic banding, LA contraction, early reservoir function and thereby external work during the phase increased as a compensation to LV dysfunction. The failure of this mechanism may lead to decompensation in HFPEF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document