Recent drug approvals from the US FDA and EMEA: what the future holds

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Pevarello
Keyword(s):  
The Us ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra P. Leo ◽  
Cornelia Leo ◽  
Thomas D. Szucs

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-291
Author(s):  
Chandra P. Leo ◽  
Cornelia Leo ◽  
Thomas D. Szucs

BMC Cancer ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
John Sharp ◽  
Vinay Prasad

Abstract Importance It is unknown whether and to what degree trials submitted to the US FDA to support drug approval adhere to NCCN guideline-recommended care in their baseline and surveillance CNS imaging protocols. Objective We sought to characterize the frequency with which the trials cited in US FDA drug approvals for first line advanced NSCLC between 2015 and 2020 deviated from NCCN guideline-recommended care for baseline and surveillance CNS imaging. Design, setting, and participants Retrospective observational analysis using publicly available data of (1) list of trials cited by the FDA in drug approvals for first line advanced NSCLC from 2015 to 2020 (2) individual trial protocols (3) published trial data and supplementary appendices (4) archived versions of the NCCN guidelines for NSCLC from 2009 to 2018 (the years during which the trials were enrolling). Main outcomes and measures Estimated percentage of trials for first line advanced NSCLC leading to FDA approval which deviated from NCCN guideline-recommended care with regards to CNS baseline and surveillance imaging. Results A total of 14 studies that had been cited in FDA drug approvals for first line advanced NSCLC met our inclusion criteria between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2020. Of these trials, 8 (57.1%) deviated from NCCN guidelines in their baseline CNS imaging requirement. The frequency of re-assessment of CNS disease was variable amongst trials as well, with 9 (64.3%) deviating from NCCN recommendations. Conclusions and relevance The trials supporting US FDA drug approvals in first line advanced NSCLC often have CNS imaging requirements that do not adhere to NCCN guidelines. Many trials permit alternative, substandard methods and the proportion of patients undergoing each modality is uniformly not reported. Nonstandard CNS surveillance protocols are common. To best serve patients with advanced NSCLC in the US, drug approvals by the FDA must be based on trials that mirror clinical practice and have imaging requirements consistent with current US standard of care.


2001 ◽  
Vol &NA; (1272) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
&NA;
Keyword(s):  
The Us ◽  
Us Fda ◽  

Author(s):  
Frédéric Grare

India’s relationship with the United States remains crucial to its own objectives, but is also ambiguous. The asymmetry of power between the two countries is such that the relationship, if potentially useful, is not necessary for the United States while potentially risky for India. Moreover, the shift of the political centre of gravity of Asia — resulting from the growing rivalry between China and the US — is eroding the foundations of India’s policy in Asia, while prospects for greater economic interaction is limited by India’s slow pace of reforms. The future of India-US relations lies in their capacity to evolve a new quid pro quo in which the US will formulate its expectations in more realistic terms while India would assume a larger share of the burden of Asia’ security.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document