SIR WILLIAM THOMSON, LORD KELVIN ( 1824–1907): ON THE SECULAR COOLING OF THE EARTH

1982 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank A. J. L. James

In 1859 Charles Darwin in chapter nine of the Origin of Species showed how he had calculated that the age of the Weald was three hundred million years and that consequently the age of the earth was considerably greater than that. Darwin of course needed such a long period of time for the process of evolution by natural selection to occur. Arguments which showed that the earth could not be that old would therefore cast serious doubt on his theory. Such views were advanced in 1862 by William Thomson, later Lord Kelvin, professor of Natural Philosophy at Glasgow. He specifically challenged the result of Darwin's calculation of the age of the Weald by arguing that the sun could not have emitted its heat and light for that length of time. The consequences of this assertion for the biological and geological sciences for the remainder of the nineteenth century have already been delineated by Burchfield. What I wish to do in this paper is to show that the theoretical basis of Thomson's 1862 assertion had not been specifically developed as a response to Darwin, but that it was a consequence of the formulation of the first two laws of thermodynamics. I shall also show that Thomson's work was not done in isolation but that the question of the maintenance of solar energy was a serious concern of a number of physicists who had formulated the laws of thermodynamics.


1963 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Olby

Darwin only published one account of his provisional hypothesis of pangenesis, and that is to be found in chapter xxvii of his book The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, the first edition of which is dated 1868. The absence of any earlier account in Darwin's works has led some to assume that he had recourse to this hypothesis only a short time before the published date of the book containing it, and on the basis of this assumption they have asserted that he produced it as a part of his defence of the theory of evolution against the criticisms made of it by the physicists Sir William Thomson, afterwards Lord Kelvin, and Fleeming Jenkin. But to make such an assertion is to ignore the fact that Darwin had already sent his manuscript of pangenesis to Huxley in the year 1865, two years before Fleeming Jenkin's article appeared and three years before Lord Kelvin openly attacked the evolutionary theory. The discovery of this manuscript of pangenesis has, therefore, some importance, for it should reveal Darwin's conception of pangenesis in 1865.


2019 ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
Matthew Stanley

Today the laws of physics are often seen as evidence for a naturalistic worldview. However, historically, physics was usually considered compatible with belief in God. Foundations of physics such as thermodynamics, uniformity of nature, and causality were seen as religiously based by physicists such as James Clerk Maxwell and William Thomson, Lord Kelvin. These were usually interpreted as evidence of design by a creative deity. In the late nineteenth century, John Tyndall and other scientific naturalists made the argument that these foundations were more sympathetic to a non-religious understanding of the natural world. With the success of this approach, twentieth-century religious physicists tended to stress non-material and experiential connections rather than looking for evidence of design. Later parts of that century saw a revival of natural theological arguments in the form of the anthropic principle and the fine-tuning problem. While modern physics is naturalistic, this was not inevitable and there were several alternative approaches common in earlier times.


2020 ◽  
pp. 109-140
Author(s):  
Brian Cantor

The external surface of a material has an atomic or molecular structure that is different from the bulk material. So does any internal interface within a material. Because of this, the energy of a material or any grain or particle within it increases with the curvature of its bounding surface, as described by the Gibbs-Thomson equation. This chapter explains how surfaces control the nucleation of new phases during reactions such as solidification and precipitation, the coarsening and growth of particles during heat treatment, the equilibrium shape of crystals, and the surface adsorption and segregation of solutes and impurities. The Gibbs-Thomson was predated by a number of related equations; it is not clear whether it is named after J. J. Thomson or William Thomson (Lord Kelvin); and it was not put into its current usual form until after Gibbs’, Thomson’s and Kelvin’s time. J. J. Thomson was the third Cavendish Professor of Physics at Cambridge University. He discovered the electron, which had a profound impact on the world, notably via Thomas Edison’s invention of the light bulb, and subsequent building of the world’s first electricity distribution network. William Thomson was Professor of Natural Philosophy at Glasgow University. He made major scientific developments, notably in thermodynamics, and he helped build the first trans-Atlantic undersea telegraph. Because of his scientific pre-eminence, the absolute unit of temperature, the degree Kelvin, is named after him.


1926 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
J. Alfred Ewing

In this the centenary year of Lord Kelvin's birth it is fitting that the Society should call to remembrance one who was for long its most distinguished Fellow, who first became its President at the age of thirty-nine, and was repeatedly re-elected to the office, which he held for twenty-one years in all, and who used the Society as a medium for the publication of many of his most brilliant discoveries. In the long list of his published papers there are at least one hundred and twenty items communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh. No other contributor has done so much to give to our Proceedings and Transactions a world-wide and lasting fame. It was to this Society that he brought, in 1849, his account of Carnot's Theory, which marks the beginning of his study of Thermodynamics, and it was in our Transactions that he published his epochmaking series of papers on the “Dynamical Theory of Heat” from 1851 to 1854. It was here in 1852 that he propounded the doctrine of the Dissipation of Energy. It was here that his investigations of underground temperature and the secular cooling of the Earth appeared in 1860 and 1862. It was here in 1865 that he “briefly refuted” the doctrine of Uniformity in Geology. Here, too, were published his long series of papers on Vortex Motion and Vortex Atoms, from 1867 to 1881, and much of his work on the molecular constitution of matter. Here he first showed, in germ, his mariner's compass, in 1874.


2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Trainer
Keyword(s):  

1873 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 147-227 ◽  

1. Plutonic action has long been loosely applied by geologists as a term for forces of some sort, of whose nature little was known, acting deep beneath the surface of our globe, and either not directly manifesting themselves at all at the surface, or, if so, chiefly in the form of earthquakes, thermal springs, & c.; while volcanic action, showing itself at the surface in the phenomena of extinct, dormant, or active volcanoes, has been very generally regarded as something different in nature as well as in degree of activity. Some relations have always, more or less vaguely, been admitted between these; but each has in turn been placed in the relation of cause and effect to the other. A third class of actions, those of “forces of elevation,” though assumed to have some relations with the preceding, have very commonly been regarded by geologists as differing in nature from both, in degree as well as in kind. It is true that all these phenomena have been linked together by such wide and vague phrases as that of Humboldt, who speaks of them as “the reaction of the interior of a planet upon its exterior;” but I am not aware of any attempt having previously been made to colligate them all as effects originating in one common cause, and that referable to the admitted cosmical facts and mechanism of our globe. Sir William Thomson, regarding all these phenomena from the lofty point of thermodynamics (from which the writer also is about to view them in this paper), has distinctly colligated them as referable to dissipation of energy existing in our planet in the form of terrestrial heat, and has given to all its play of phenomena the title of “Plutonic action,” which he defines as “any transformation of energy going on within the earth” (Trans. Geolog. Soc. of Glasgow, vol. iii. pt. ii.).


1977 ◽  
Vol 303 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-224
Author(s):  
Alan J. Rocke
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document