VI. INTERNATIONAL PRICE ADJUSTMENTS: THEORIES AND INVESTIGATIONS, 1848-1914

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil McCulloch ◽  
Davide Natalini ◽  
Naomi Hossain ◽  
Patricia Justino

Abstract Fuel riots are common around the world. Between 2005 and 2018, 41 countries had at least one riot directly associated with popular demand for fuel. We make use of a new international dataset on fuel riots to explore the effects of fuel prices and price regimes on fuel riots. In line with prior expectations, we find that large domestic fuel price shocks are a key driver of riots - as these are often linked to international price shocks. In addition, we report a novel result: fuel riots are closely associated with domestic price regimes. Countries that maintain fixed price regimes - notably net energy exporters - tend to have large fuel subsidies. When such subsidies become unsustainable, domestic price adjustments are large, often leading to riots.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquim Guilhoto ◽  
Carlos Roberto Azzoni ◽  
Fernando Gaiger Silveira ◽  
Tatiane A. de Menezes ◽  
Marcos M. Hasegawa ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Bhana

The objective of this study is to determine whether companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange overreacted to unexpected favourable and unfavourable company-specific news events during the period 1970 - 1984. The JSE appears to be inefficient in reacting to the announcement of unfavourable news; economically significant abnormal returns up to one year following the event are observed. The JSE does not appear to overreact to news of a favourable nature, there is only weak evidence of short-term overreaction. The selling pressure caused by panic selling could depress prices well below levels justified by the unfavourable news. The magnitude of the overreaction to unfavourable news is sufficient to enable astute investors to outperform the market by taking positions in these securities. Knowledge of the pattern of market overreaction can also be of value to investors for transactions that are to take place anyway.


1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia M. Danzon ◽  
Jeong D. Kim

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-314
Author(s):  
Emiliano Marchisio

Abstract The debate about the ‘just price’ has ancient origin and returns forcefully to the scene when, in the event of crises of various kinds, there is a rapid and significant increase in prices of given goods or services. The main issue is whether price increases of such a nature could, or should, be considered illicit and ground the issue of sanctions against the firms increasing prices, thus focusing on a macro-systemic level of analysis. The central part of the article reviews different theories on what a ‘just price’ should be and focuses on the idea that a price is ‘just’ when it functions as an index of relative scarcity in free markets. It is claimed that such a function deserves protection by Italian and EU law. Therefore price adjustments in response to shocks cannot and should not be considered illegal: it is unacceptable to sanction private firms by attributing them the wrong of not having substituted themselves, at their own expense, for the exercise of a public function (that of making sure that price increases do not put at risk solidarity and other constitutional principles).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agostina Brinatti ◽  
Alberto Cavallo ◽  
Javier Cravino ◽  
Andres Drenik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document