scholarly journals Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon

2021 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
Junseak Lee ◽  
Jung Hwan Oh ◽  
Jinsu Kim ◽  
Chul-Hyun Lim ◽  
Sung Hoon Jung
Endoscopy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (S 01) ◽  
pp. E446-E446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana García-Rodríguez ◽  
Marco Álvarez ◽  
Agustin Seoane

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e60-e62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Mederos ◽  
Lynda Humaran ◽  
Donald Minervini

Author(s):  
Zehra Ozturk ◽  
Taner Usta ◽  
Mustafa Acet ◽  
Ugur Ates ◽  
Bilhan Sidal

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Elpida Samara ◽  
Kerry Howe-Bush ◽  
Mark Portet ◽  
David C Howlett

An intrauterine device is a well-tolerated and widely used contraceptive method. A rare but major complication is perforation of the uterus and migration into the sigmoid colon. In this case report, a 33-year-old woman presented for follow up after placement of a copper-T intrauterine device 4 months previously. A clinical examination found significant tenderness on palpation, and the threads could not be detected. An ultrasound was conducted, which revealed no coil in the uterine cavity. The pelvic x-ray found it in the mid-pelvis and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the position of the T-component at the mid-sigmoid colon. The patient underwent a sigmoidoscopy, which confirmed the position in the sigmoid colonic wall. The device was removed with an endoscopy without further complications. Uterine perforation and translocation to the sigmoid colon is an unusual complication of an intrauterine device. Removal of a translocated intrauterine device is recommended in all symptomatic cases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-599
Author(s):  
Ahmet Bozdag ◽  
Onder Altas ◽  
Abdurrahman Sahin ◽  
Zeynep Ozkan

Intrauterine device (IUD) is one of the frequently used contraceptive methods in the developing countries, due to its high efficacy, low risks and low costs. However, it may cause some important complications. One of these complications is migration of IUD to adjacent organs. The migration of IUDs to sigmoid colon is rare and it is reported as case reports. In this article, we wanted to share the colonoscopic evaluation of a 38-year-old female patient who presented with chronic abdominal pain, meanwhile the detection of IUD in the sigmoid colon and its removal with colonoscopy.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.16(4) 2017 p.597-599


Author(s):  
Jharna Behura ◽  
Sanjiva Kumar

Post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device inserted during caesarean section provides long acting reversible contraception to women soon after birth. It is now well accepted for its safety and efficacy. Uterine perforation, which is one of the most serious complication of PPIUCD has rarely been reported following intracaesarean insertion. The thick uterine wall and placement under direct vision helps prevent perforation. However, migration of IUCD to peritoneal cavity, causing perforation of several adjacent organs can occur due to improper closure of the uterine incision. Migration to sigmoid colon is an extremely rare complication. Authors present the case of a 29-year-old woman who had a Cu T 380 A insertion during Caesarean section. After 12 months of insertion, the patient suffered abdominal pain gradually increasing in intensity and frequent episodes of bleeding per rectum. Laparoscopic exploration revealed IUCD perforating the sigmoid colon completely and adhesions of bowel loops to the sigmoid colon. Extraction using laparoscopic method by gently pulling the threads was unsuccessful and the patient was managed by laparotomy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Funda Akpinar ◽  
Esra Nur Ozgur ◽  
Saynur Yilmaz ◽  
Oguzhan Ustaoglu

Background.Intrauterine devices (IUD) are commonly used birth control methods. Colonic perforation is an infrequent but serious complication of IUD.Case.A 34-year-old woman with 2-years history of IUD, inserted at early puerperal period, presented to gynecologist with chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia. Radiological assessment revealed that there were two copper-T devices: one in uterine cavity and another in the colonic lumen. Attempts of retrieval with colonoscopy and laparoscopy were unsuccessful. Intrauterine device embedded in sigmoid colon wall was removed with resection of the involved segment and primary anastomosis was performed.Conclusion.Although there are cases in literature that are successfully managed with colonoscopy, in chronic cases, formation of granulation tissue complicates retrieval of an IUD by this intervention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Robayo-Amortegui ◽  
Marcela Rincon-Vanegas ◽  
Adolfredo Ballestas-Blanquicet ◽  
Jair Ruiz-Fonseca

AbstractCurrently, the intrauterine device (IUD) is one of the most used contraceptive methods worldwide, since it has shown to be effective and reversible. One of its complications is the migration of the device, which can affect close organs by perforating them. We present the case of a patient who presented a colouterine fistula secondary to an IUD migration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document