Effects of Fish Oil on Cytokines, Glycemic Control, Blood Pressure, and Serum Lipids in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2013 ◽  
Vol S3 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Rastmanesh
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A331-A331
Author(s):  
Matthew J Budoff ◽  
Timothy M E Davis ◽  
Alexandra G Palmer ◽  
Robert Frederich ◽  
David E Lawrence ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Ertugliflozin (ERTU), a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, is approved as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Aim: As a pre-specified sub-study of the Phase 3 VERTIS CV trial (NCT01986881), the efficacy and safety of ERTU were assessed in patients with T2DM and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) inadequately controlled with metformin and sulfonylurea (SU). Methods: Patients with T2DM, established ASCVD, and HbA1c 7.0–10.5% on stable metformin (≥1500 mg/day) and SU doses as defined per protocol were randomized to once-daily ERTU (5 mg or 15 mg) or placebo. The primary sub-study objectives were to assess the effect of ERTU on HbA1c compared with placebo and to evaluate safety and tolerability during 18-week follow-up. Key secondary endpoints included proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, and systolic blood pressure. Changes from baseline at Week 18 for continuous efficacy endpoints were assessed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model. Results: Of the 8246 patients enrolled in the VERTIS CV trial, 330 patients were eligible for this sub-study (ERTU 5 mg, n=100; ERTU 15 mg, n=113; placebo, n=117). Patients had a mean (SD) age of 63.2 (8.4) years, T2DM duration 11.4 (7.4) years, estimated glomerular filtration rate 83.5 (17.8) mL/min/1.73 m2, and HbA1c 8.3% (1.0) (67.4 [10.6] mmol/mol). At Week 18, ERTU 5 mg and 15 mg were each associated with a significantly greater least squares mean (95% CI) HbA1c reduction from baseline versus placebo; the placebo-adjusted differences for ERTU 5 mg and 15 mg were –0.7% (–0.9, –0.4) and –0.8% (–1.0, –0.5), respectively (P<0.001). A higher proportion of patients in each ERTU group achieved HbA1c <7% relative to placebo (P<0.001). ERTU significantly reduced FPG and body weight (P<0.001, for each dose versus placebo), but not systolic blood pressure. Adverse events were reported in 48.0%, 54.9%, and 47.0% of patients in the ERTU 5 mg, 15 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Genital mycotic infections were experienced by significantly higher proportions of male patients who received ERTU 5 mg and 15 mg (4.2% and 4.8%, respectively) versus placebo (0.0%; P≤0.05) and by a numerically, but not significantly, higher proportion of female patients who received ERTU 15 mg (10.3%) compared with placebo (3.8%) (P=0.36). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia were 11.0% (5 mg), 12.4% (15 mg), and 7.7% (placebo), and of severe hypoglycemia 2.0% (5 mg), 1.8% (15 mg), and 0.9% (placebo). Conclusion: Among patients with T2DM and ASCVD, ERTU (5 mg and 15 mg) added to metformin and SU for 18 weeks improved glycemic control (HbA1c and FPG) and reduced body weight, and was generally well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with the SGLT2 inhibitor class.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigusie Gashaye Shita ◽  
Ashagrie Sharew Iyasu

Abstract Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with hyperglycemia for a long period are significant causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Studying the predictors of glycemic control helps to minimize deaths and the development of acute and chronic diabetes complication. Hence, this study aims to assess predictors of glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients enrolled between December 2011 and December 2012 at Debre Markos and Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital. A total of 191 T2DM patients were included in the study meets the eligibility criteria. A generalized linear mixed model was employed. Results: The prevalence of good glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients was 58.4% whereas 23.25% of the variation was explained in the fitted model due to adding the random effects. The significance predictors of glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes at 95% confidence level were reside in rural(0.454, 0.614)), patients age 38-50, 51-59 and 60-66 years(1.267,1.776), (1.057,1.476) and (1.004, 1.403), respectively, Proteinuria Positive (1.211, 1.546), diastolic blood pressure ≥90 (1.101, 1.522), systolic blood pressure ≥140 (1.352, 1.895), creatinine (0.415, 0.660), duration per visit (0.913, 0.987), duration since diagnosis (0.985, 0.998), weight 78-88(0.603, 0.881).Conclusion: The level of glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients was poor. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients having higher age of the patient, higher weight, reside in rural, longer duration of T2DM since diagnosis, longer duration of type 2DM per visit, increase creatinine, positive protein urea, diastolic blood pressure≥90, and systolic blood pressure≥140 were significant predictors of poor glycemic control among type 2 DM patients. During diabetic patients follow up, clinicians should give appropriate attention to these significant variables for good glycemic control since it is the main goal of diabetes management.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigusie Gashaye Shita ◽  
Ashagrie Sharew Iyasu

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with hyperglycemia for a long period of time are significant causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Studying the predictors of glycemic control help to minimize deaths and the development of acute and chronic diabetes complication. Hence, the aim of this study is to asses’ predictors of glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes in Ethiopia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients enrolled between December 2011 and December 2012 at Debre Markos and Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital. A total of 191 T2DM patients was included in the study who meets the eligibility criteria. Generalized linear mixed model was employed. Results The prevalence of good glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients was 58.4% where as 23.25% of variation was explained in the fitted model due to adding the random effects. The significance predictors of glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes at 95% confidence level were reside in rural(0.454, 0.614)), patients age 38–50, 51–59 and 60–66 years(1.267,1.776), (1.057,1.476) and (1.004, 1.403), respectively, Proteinuria positive(1.211,1.546), diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 (1.101, 1.522), systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 (1.352, 1.895), creatinine (0.415, 0.660), duration per visit (0.913, 0.987), duration since diagnosis (0.985, 0.998), weight 78–88(0.603, 0.881). Conclusion Level of glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients was poor. Resident, age, weight, duration of T2DM since diagnosis, duration of type 2 DM per visit, follow up time, protein urea, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure and creatinine were significant predictors of glycemic control among type 2 DM patients. During diabetic patients follow up, clinicians should give appropriate attention to these significant variables for good glycemic control since it is the main goal of diabetes management.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olesya L. Ilkun ◽  
Tom Greene ◽  
Alfred K. Cheung ◽  
Paul K. Whelton ◽  
Guo Wei ◽  
...  

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine whether low baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) modifies the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). <p><b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial (ACCORD BP),a 2X2 factorial randomized controlled trial, examined effects of SBP (<120 vs. <140 mmHg) and glycemic (HbA1C < 6% vs. 7.0–7.9% (<42 vs 53-63 mmol/mol)) control on cardiovascular events in T2DM (N=4731). We examined whether effects of SBP control on cardiovascular composite was modified by baseline DBP and glycemic control. </p> <p><b><i>Results: </i></b>Intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of the cardiovascular composite (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98) in the standard glycemic arm but not in the intensive glycemic arm (HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.40). Spline regression models relating the effects of the intervention on the cardiovascular composite across the range of baseline DBP did not show evidence of effect modification by low baseline DBP for the cardiovascular composite in the standard or intensive glycemic arms. The relation between the effect of the intensive SBP intervention and baseline DBP was similar between glycemic arms for the cardiovascular composite (3-way interaction p-value = 0.83).</p> <p><b><i>Conclusions: </i></b>in persons with T2DM, intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of cardiovascular composite endpoint irrespective of baseline DBP in the setting of standard glycemic control. Hence, low baseline DBP should not be an impediment to intensive SBP lowering in T2DM patients treated with guidelines recommended standard glycemic control. </p>


Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (suppl_12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Yin Chen ◽  
Chien-Chia Chuang ◽  
Sophia Wu ◽  
Nicole Quon

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a concerning epidemic, and sub-optimal glycemic control could lead to higher risk of complications and needs for additional care. Hypertension and obesity are common comorbid conditions, yet their impact on glycemic control has not been quantified. We hypothesize that comorbid hypertension and/or obesity are associated with a higher likelihood of uncontrolled glycemic level. METHODS: Data from a nationally representative sample of US population participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2010 were analyzed in a cross-sectional retrospective observational study. Adults aged 20 years or older with self-reported diabetes and anti-diabetes medication use were included. Pregnant women were excluded. T2DM was defined by excluding diabetes patients who were diagnosed before age 30 and took only insulin. Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as blood pressure of ≥130 mmHg (systolic) or ≥80 mmHg (diastolic) based on American Diabetes Association’s guidance for hypertension in diabetes patients. Obesity was determined if body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 . Uncontrolled glycemic level was defined as HbA1c ≥7%. We estimated the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and obesity among T2DM patients. Rates of uncontrolled glycemic level were reported and compared by uncontrolled hypertension and/or obesity status using Chi-square tests. Population weights were applied to account for multi-stage sampling design to produce nationally representative estimates. RESULTS: After applying the population weights to the 2,203 respondents with T2DM, findings from these respondents were extrapolated to an estimated 15.4 million T2DM patients in the US (prevalence of T2DM=7.4%), of which 61.1% were obese. Among US T2DM patients, the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension was 52.6%. Among US T2DM patients, the prevalence of patients who had uncontrolled hypertension and who were obese was 31.2%. No statistically significant differences were found in uncontrolled glycemic level rates between those with and without uncontrolled hypertension (44.0% vs. 41.0%; p=0.31). Obese patients had a statistically significant higher rate of uncontrolled glycemic level than non-obese (44.5% vs. 37.9%; p=0.03). T2DM patients with comorbid uncontrolled hypertension and obesity had a statistically significant higher rate of uncontrolled glycemic level than the rest of the T2DM patients (47.1% vs. 40.0%; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and obesity was high in US adults with T2DM. Obese patients, especially those who had uncontrolled blood pressure, had sub-optimal glycemic control. Interventions targeting these patients should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document