A Case of Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia with Rheumatoid Arthritis Presentation

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (09) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel McCoy William Edenfield
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3278-3278
Author(s):  
Priyanka Priyanka ◽  
Janhavi Raut ◽  
Patricia S Fox ◽  
Francesco Stingo ◽  
Tariq Muzzafar

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm that belongs to the category of myelodysplastic syndrome / myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS / MPN). The International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes (IPSS) classification and its revised version (IPSS-R) addressed patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MDS and excluded CMML. While numerous investigators have attempted to devise a prognostic risk scoring system for CMML, no system has been generally accepted for this entity. A CMML-specific prognostic scoring (CPSS) system proposed by Such, et al [Blood. 2013; 11;121(15):3005-15] defines 4 different prognostic risk categories for estimating both overall survival (OS) and risk for AML transformation; the alternative version replaces RBC transfusion dependency with hemoglobin levels. AIM: The aim of the study is to validate the alternative CPSS scoring system on the CMML patient cohort at UT MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). METHODS: The databases of the Department of Hematopathology at UTMDACC were searched for patients diagnosed with CMML presenting from 2005 to 2012. Cases were classified by WHO 2008 criteria. Inclusion criteria were: confirmed diagnosis of CMML, age > 18 years, persistent absolute monocyte count >1 × 109/L, marrow blasts < 20%, peripheral blood blasts < 20%. The alternative CPSS score was calculated as a function of WHO subtype, FAB subtype, CMML-specific cytogenetic risk classification, and hemoglobin score. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model overall survival and time to AML progression from date of diagnosis. For time to AML progression, patients who did not experience AML progression were censored at their date of death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and the log-rank test was used to test for significant differences by CPSS score. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 for Windows. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients with newly diagnosed, untreated CMML were identified in the clinical databases. These included 132 males and 71 females; median age was 70 (range 55-80) years. 149 had CMML-1 and 54 had CMML-2. A total of 107 deaths and 38 progressions were observed. The median (range) follow-up time for all patients was 1.9 (2 days-10.8) years. The variables that compose the alternative CPSS (WHO subtype, FAB subtype, CMML-specific cytogenetic risk classification, hemoglobin) as well as a description of how the score is calculated are given in Tables 1-2. In univariate Cox models, the alternative CPSS score was a significant predictor of both OS and time to AML progression (Type III p-values <.0001 and 0.0037, respectively). Median survival times for OS were 4.07, 3.32, 2.14, and 1.23 years in the low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high risk groups, respectively. Since less than half the patients progressed, the median time to AML progression could not be estimated for all groups but was 6.40 and 1.60 in the intermediate-2 and high risk groups, respectively. Overall, the alternative CPSS score was highly predictive of both OS and progression free survival (PFS) and clearly delineated the patient risk groups in this sample. CONCLUSIONS: These data reinforce the validity of the alternative CPSS and serve as an additional validation cohort. Table 1. Alternative CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) score criteria Variable Each level assigned the following value(sum to get the composite CPSS score): 0 1 2 WHO subtype CMML-1 blasts (including promonocytes) <5% in the PB and <10% in the BM CMML-2 blasts (including promonocytes) from 5% to 19% in the PB and from 10% to 19% in the BM, or when Auer rods are present irrespective of blast count — FAB subtype CMML-MD (WBC <13 × 109/L) CMML-MP (WBC ≥13 × 109/L) — CMML-specific cytogenetic risk classification* Low Intermediate High Hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL <10/dL WBC: white blood cell * CMML-specific cytogenetic risk classification; low: normal and isolated –Y; intermediate: other abnormalities; and high: trisomy 8, complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities), chromosome 7 abnormalities Table 2. Alternative CPSS: scores used for predicting likelihood of survival and leukemic evolution in individual patient with CMML Risk group Overall CPSS score Low 0 Intermediate-1 1 Intermediate-2 2-3 High 4-5 Figure 1 Overall Survival by alternative CPSS Score Figure 1. Overall Survival by alternative CPSS Score Figure 2 Time to AML Progression by alternative CPSS Score Figure 2. Time to AML Progression by alternative CPSS Score Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5607-5607
Author(s):  
Brayan Marcel Merchan Ruiz ◽  
Teresa Bernal ◽  
Montserrat Arnan ◽  
Mar Tormo ◽  
Jose Angel Hernandez Rivas ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by a heterogeneous clinical and morphological expression that shares features of both myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myeloproliferative disorders. In the last years therapy of CMML has undergone a change with the inclusion of the demethylating agents but data regarding their impact on the “real life” setting are still scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of the different therapies and the time to therapy in an unselected Spanish population within the ERASME study. Materials and methods The ERASME study (CEL-SMD-2012-01) is an observational, post-authorization, prospective, multicenter study that will include a total of 600 patients with MDS and CMML and follow them during a minimum of three years (or until death). The primary objective of this study is to describe the disease progression in routine clinical practice, based on the initial therapeutic strategy, in patients with newly diagnosed MDS and CMML. We present here the results of a pre-specified interim analysis with data of CMML patients enrolled in the ERASME study. Initial patient management strategy is classified in three groups: Observation (OB) & support (SP) (including blood and platelet transfusions and growth factors), active therapy (AT) (including chemotherapy, azacitidine, lenalidomide, etc) and allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (including those patients receiving other therapies before transplant). Results A total of 41 CMML patients (34% women) with a median age of 80 years (range 49-91) have been recruited between January 2013-June 2014. The median follow-up time was 6.7 months (range 0.4-15.1). Morphological subtypes according WHO classification were CMML-1 (blasts count <10%) in 35 patients (85%) and CMML-2 (blasts count 10% to 19%) in 6 (15%). According to FAB criteria, 30 patients (73%) had CMML-MD depending on absolute leukocyte count at diagnosis (WBC ≤13x109/L) and 11 (27%) had CMML-MP (WBC >13x109/L). Karyotype was normal in 32 patients (86%). Five patients displayed cytogenetic abnormalities; 3 out of 5 patients with trisomy 8 (isolated or with one additional abnormality). The CMML-GESMD cytogenetic risk classification was low/intermediate/high risk in 83%/10%/5% of patients, respectively. The CPSS was low/int-1/int-2/high in 46%/32%/15%/5% of patients, respectively. Nine out of 41 patients were transfusion dependent at diagnosis. Median bone marrow blast count was 3% (range 0-33). Hemoglobin, platelet and neutrophil count was: 11.1 g/dL (range 7.8-16.7), 106x103/µL (4.2-415), and 3.98x109/L (range 0.48-57.2), respectively. After diagnosis, 33, 7 and 1 of CMML patients were considered candidate to SP/OB, AT and HCT strategy, respectively. The main reasons for treatment selection were risk-disease (90%), symptomatology (83%), age (73%), and comorbidities (46%).The median time to AT initiation from diagnosis for AT/OB&SP was 0.52/2.5 months (range 0.22-2.29) and (range 1.0-4.7) for each group, respectively. Patients in active therapy received azacitidine (n=2, 29%), other low-dose chemotherapy (n=4, 57%) and other therapy (erythropoietin and azacitidine) (n=1, 14%), respectively. Only one patient was considered candidate for HCT and this patient received azacitidine prior the transplant. At last follow-up, a total of 5 (12%) of patients have died (2, 29% of active therapy and 3, 9% of support group) after a median of 3.6 months (range 3.1-4.1) and 1.7 months (range 0.7-10), for each group respectively. Conclusions CMML patients were treated on an individualized therapy strategy after diagnostic evaluation and prognosis assessment. More data on disease progression in routine clinical practice may be useful in characterizing the newly diagnosed CMML patients. Our prospective study confirms that azacitidine has been considered a therapy for CMML patients, including for HCT candidates. Disclosures Off Label Use: Vidaza, erythropoietin stimulating agents, revlimid. Valcarcel:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rafel:Celgene: Employment. Garcia:Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1713-1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Padron ◽  
Jeffrey S. Painter ◽  
Adam W Mailloux ◽  
Jessica M. McDaniel ◽  
Christopher Bebbington ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1713 Background: Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) and Juvenile Myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) are classified as MDS/MPN in the WHO classification system. Despite sharing clinical and histological features, CMML is characterized by a heterogeneous collection of molecular lesions while JMML is defined by well-established molecular aberrations clustered along the RAS pathway leading directly to GM-CSF hypersensitivity; a pathognomonic characteristic of JMML. Here we test whether a molecular signature for GM-CSF hypersensitivity in JMML, determined by the pSTAT5 activation assay, is also present in CMML and whether this signature clusters within a specific CMML subgroup. Methods: Cryopreserved bone marrow aspirates from 24 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed CMML were obtained from the Moffitt Cancer Center Tissue Repository. Cells were thawed and rested in Stem Span H3000 with 10% FBS for 2 hours and then either starved for one hour in serum-free media, serum free group (n=12), or rested in Stem Span for an additional hour, serum group (n=12), prior to stimulation with G-CSF, IL-3, or GM-CSF for 15 minutes and then fixed and permeabilized with formaldehyde and methanol, as previously described. Samples were stained with an anti-pSTAT5(Y-694) antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry (Kotecha, Cancer Cell. 2009). Cells stained with isotype-control antibody were used to establish the threshold for basal STAT5 phosphorylation. Because STAT5 was constitutively phosphorylated in serum, and to a lesser extent in serum-free conditions, inducible cytokine activation was defined as the percentage of pSTAT5 positive cells above untreated samples in both CMML and healthy controls. A retrospective chart review was performed to obtain clinical variables including age, sex, WHO classification, Dusseldorf scoring system, MD Anderson scoring system, WBC, peripheral monocyte count, blast percentage, anemia, platelet count, splenomegaly, and metaphase cytogenetics. Results: The percentage of pSTAT5 responsive cells after G-CSF stimulation with doses up to 10 ng/ml was similar in cases and normal BM controls (p=0.14), whereas, a statistically significant increase in the percentage of inducible pSTAT5 positive cells was observed with GM-CSF 0.1 ng/ml (p=0.04), GM-CSF 1 ng/ml (p=0.02), and GM-CSF 10 ng/ml (p=0.01) in CMML BM cells compared to healthy donor BM cells, as shown in Figure 1. Using one standard deviation below the mean as a cut point, only 5 patients failed to show GM-CSF hypersensitivity in the serum (n=3) and serum-free groups (n=2), respectively. IL-3 and GM-CSF play similar roles in hematopoietic growth through the activation of JAK2/STAT5 and share a common beta-chain required for signaling. Signaling mediated by GM-CSF and IL3 converge to activate RAS and other downstream intermediates that regulate DNA synthesis, cell-cycle progression and suppression of apoptosis. The concentration of IL3 required to induce STAT5 phosphorylation was 10-fold greater than GM-CSF in CMML cells, but the percentage of cells responsive to IL3 was greater in CMML cases compared to controls at 10 ng/ml (p=0.02). Analysis of the percentage of GM-CSF hypersensitive cells and clinical parameters revealed no associations with age at onset, WHO classification, Dusseldorf scoring system, MD Anderson scoring system, blast percentage, anemia, platelet count, splenomegaly, or karyotype. The percentage of pSTAT5 positive cells with GM-CSF 0.1 ng/ml positively correlated with the total leukocyte (p=0.03) and total monocyte (p=0.02) count indicating that the JAK2/STAT5 signaling response is indicative of disease burden. Conclusions: Based on the threshold for cytokine stimulation and percentage of cells that display pSTAT5 induction, CMML appears to preferentially utilize GM-CSF for survival and/or expansion. Although RAS mutations were not assessed, CMML cells were preferentially sensitive to GM-CSF in newly diagnosed cases independent of cytogenetic abnormalities suggesting that JMML and CMML share biological features of GM-CSF hypersensitivity. Disclosures: Padron: KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Bebbington:KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baer:KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 232470962096686
Author(s):  
Anthony Kunnumpurath ◽  
Sai Prasad Desikan ◽  
Charles McClain ◽  
Raman Desikan

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare clonal stem cell disorder associated with clinical and pathologic of myelodysplasia and myeloproliferation. Systemic autoimmune/inflammatory disorders (SAID) and polyserositis have been associated with CMML. These manifestations can be observed concomitantly, shortly before diagnosis or anytime along the course of illness. We report a case of myeloproliferative CMML who presented with polyserositis and positive serology for rheumatoid arthritis. Retrospective studies of myelodysplasia/CMML have reported 15% to 25% incidence of SAID. The most commonly observed disorders include systemic vasculitis, connective tissue diseases, polychondritis, seronegative arthritis, and immune thrombocytopenia. SAID does not confer adverse prognosis in retrospective studies. Polyserositis is less common; this may result from leukemic infiltrate or result from autoimmunity. Treatment of serositis includes steroids and cytoreductive agents. Serositis may confer poor prognosis and hypomethylating therapy may improve the outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document