scholarly journals AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Pediatric Patients With Tracheostomy in the Acute Care Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-155
Author(s):  
Teresa A Volsko ◽  
Sara W Parker ◽  
Kathleen Deakins ◽  
Brian K Walsh ◽  
Katherine L Fedor ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. respcare.09006
Author(s):  
Natalie Napolitano ◽  
Ariel Berlinski ◽  
Brian K. Walsh ◽  
Emily Ginier ◽  
Shawna L. Strickland

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-169
Author(s):  
Constance C Mussa ◽  
Dina Gomaa ◽  
Daniel D Rowley ◽  
Ulrich Schmidt ◽  
Emily Ginier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3205-3216
Author(s):  
Thomas Lehrnbecher ◽  
Brian T. Fisher ◽  
Bob Phillips ◽  
Melissa Beauchemin ◽  
Fabianne Carlesse ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To develop a clinical practice guideline for systemic antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. METHODS Recommendations were developed by an international multidisciplinary panel that included a patient advocate. We conducted a systematic review of systemic antifungal prophylaxis in children and adults with cancer and HSCT recipients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to make strong or weak recommendations and to classify level of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low. The panel considered directness of the data to pediatric patients. RESULTS There were 68 randomized trials included in the systematic review, of which 6 (9%) were conducted in a solely pediatric population. Strong recommendations were made to administer systemic antifungal prophylaxis to children and adolescents receiving treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, to those undergoing allogeneic HSCT pre-engraftment, and to those receiving systemic immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease treatment. A strong recommendation was made to administer a mold-active agent with an echinocandin or a mold-active azole when systemic antifungal prophylaxis is warranted. For children younger than 13 years of age, an echinocandin, voriconazole, or itraconazole is suggested. Posaconazole may also be used in those age 13 years or older. A strong recommendation against routine administration of amphotericin as systemic antifungal prophylaxis was made. CONCLUSION We developed a clinical practice guideline for systemic antifungal prophylaxis administration in pediatric patients with cancer and HSCT recipients. Implementation and assessment of guideline-concordant rates and impacts are important future steps.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Alexandrou ◽  
Lucie M. Ramjan ◽  
Tim Spencer ◽  
Steven A. Frost ◽  
Yenna Salamonson ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim and objectives: The aim of this paper was to review published manuscripts on the use of midline catheters, the implications of study findings and recommendations for clinical practice in the acute care setting. Design: Modified integrative literature review Methods: Using key MeSH terms, we searched the electronic databases: CINAHL, Medline, and Embase. The Cochrane and Joanna Briggs databases, Google Search Engine and the reference lists of published materials were also searched. Studies were included if they were in the English language and reported the use of midline catheters in adult acute care populations. Manuscripts that described midlines made of aquavene were excluded Results: Two hundred and thirty two (232) papers were identified using the search strategy. From these identified papers, thirty (30) were included in the final review. Thematic analysis identified three major themes. These included: (i) advantages of using midline catheters (ii) disadvantages of using midline catheters (iii) insertion and management issues. Conclusion: Midline catheters have both positive and negative implications for clinical practice. They can be used for extended periods of intravenous therapy without requiring repeated cannulations but are not without risk. Midline catheters have been associated with mechanical and chemical phlebitis along with intravascular thrombosis. As such they are not suitable across the entire adult acute population. Midline catheters reduce the number of repeated cannulations which reduces patient discomfort, increases patient satisfaction and also contributes to organisational efficiency.


2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo E. Umpierrez ◽  
Richard Hellman ◽  
Mary T. Korytkowski ◽  
Mikhail Kosiborod ◽  
Gregory A. Maynard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document