scholarly journals Use of Analogy by Public Health Nurses in Problem Solving for Individual Consultations in Japan: A Multiple Case Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 345-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masako Kageyama ◽  
Taeko Shimazu ◽  
Atsuko Taguchi ◽  
Satoko Nagata ◽  
Kathy Magilvy
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Kothari ◽  
Charmaine McPherson ◽  
Dana Gore ◽  
Benita Cohen ◽  
Marjorie MacDonald ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Pitt ◽  
Owen Thomas ◽  
Pete Lindsay ◽  
Sheldon Hanton ◽  
Mark Bawden

In this 6-year, multi-study paper we summarize a new and effective framework of single-session problem-solving developed in an elite sport context at a world leading national institute of sport science and medicine (English Institute of Sport: EIS). In Study 1, we used ethnography (3.5 years) to observe how single-session problem-solving methods were being considered, explored, introduced and developed within the EIS. In Study 2, we used case-study methods split into two parts. A multiple case-study design (10 cases) was employed in Part one to evaluate how the approach was refined into an effective framework of practice. An individual case-study is then illustrated to detail the framework in-action. Collectively, findings realized a framework of single-session problem-solving for use both inside and outside of elite sport that focused on ways to reframe clients’ problems into more ‘solvable’ descriptions. Guidance for psychologists wishing to integrate these problem-solving techniques into their practice are offered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma E McGinty ◽  
Sameer Siddiqi ◽  
Sarah Linden ◽  
Joshua Horwitz ◽  
Shannon Frattaroli

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valery Ridde ◽  
Lara Gautier ◽  
Christian Dagenais ◽  
Fanny Chabrol ◽  
Renyou Hou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: All prevention efforts currently being implemented for COVID-19 are aimed at reducing the burden on strained health systems and human resources. There has been little research conducted to understand how SARS-CoV-2 has affected healthcare systems and professionals in terms of their work. Finding effective ways to share the knowledge and insight between countries, including lessons learned, is paramount to the international containment and management of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to compare the pandemic response to COVID-19 in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali. This comparison will be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in the response, including challenges for health professionals and health systems.Methods: We will use a multiple case study approach with multiple levels of nested analysis. We chose these countries as they represent different continents and different stages of the pandemic. We will focus on several major hospitals and two public health interventions (contact tracing and testing). It is a multidisciplinary research approach that will use qualitative data through observations, document analysis, and interviews, as well as quantitative data based on disease surveillance data and other publicly available data. Given that the methodological approaches of the project are largely qualitative, the ethical risks are minimal. For the quantitative component, the data being used are publicly available.Discussion: We will deliver lessons learned based on a rigorous process and on strong evidence to enable operational-level insight for national and international stakeholders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document