scholarly journals Fair Value and Its Economic Consequence on the Volatility Measures of Earnings, Stock Price and Government Debt Yield

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (09) ◽  
pp. 910-915
Author(s):  
Lan Sun
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Government Debt ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Economic Consequence

Cost of capital and asset characteristic value

2021 ◽  
pp. 2150007
Author(s):  
Bill Y. Shen
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Secondary Market ◽  
Credit Spread ◽  
Structure Model ◽  
Characteristic Value ◽  
Option Theory ◽  
The Cost

We propose a possible alternative to WACC as cost of capital for a business investment decision through option theory. The cost of capital in this new definition becomes forward-looking and easy to compute with traded market information as inputs. More importantly, it is a fair value- based approach and does not depend on investors’ own expectation. An important parameter “asset characteristic value” is identified and its role is further illustrated by using Merton’s capital structure model. Asset characteristic value can be calibrated by using stock price or credit spread observed from a secondary market.

scholarly journals The Influence of Fair Value Measurement on the Pledge of Overconfident Major Shareholders Based on Multiple Regression and Fisher Test

Complexity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Wei Wang ◽  
Xiao-Hui Qu ◽  
Jian-Ju Du ◽  
Jia-Ming Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Psychological Characteristics ◽  
Regulatory Effect ◽  
Financing Decisions ◽  
Fair Value Measurement ◽  
Financing Behavior ◽  
Behavioral Corporate Governance ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
Accrued Earnings

Adopting fair value measurement may bring more earnings fluctuations and induce irrational psychology and radical financing behavior of managers and major shareholders. Based on behavioral corporate governance theory, using the sample of A-share nonfinancial listed companies of China during 2015–2017, this paper empirically examines the regulatory effect of fair value measurement; that is, whether fair value measurement affects the company’s financing decisions when major shareholders have irrational psychological characteristics, i.e., overconfidence. The study found that overconfident major shareholders increase the probability of equity pledge and increase the proportion of equity pledge; further inspection found that if the level of accrued earnings management is higher, the adjustment effect of fair value measurement is also higher; when the risk of stock price collapse is higher, fair value measurement obviously increases the probability and ratio of overconfident major shareholders’ equity pledge. The above conclusions provide empirical evidence that fair value measurement has a positively regulatory effect on financing decisions of major shareholders.

scholarly journals The Effect of Daily Stock Price Limits on the Investment Risk: Evidence from the Egyptian Stock Market

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai Ahmed Abdelzaher ◽  
Khairy Elgiziry
Keyword(s):  
Stock Prices ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Trading Volume ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Price Limits ◽  
Stock Volatility ◽  
Closing Price

The study aims to investigate the relationship between daily price limits and stock volatility, trading volume, delayed adjustment of stock prices, and its fair value. To achieve this goal, we used the data of the listed firms in EGX30. We analyzed the data using descriptive analysis then we applied General linear model, ARCH and GARCH models. Based on our analysis results show a positive relationship between upper daily limit and stock volatility, a positive relationship between daily price limits (upper limit- lower limit) and trading volume, a positive relationship between upper daily limit and the return between the closing price and the opening price on the same day, a positive relationship between lower daily limit and the return between the closing price and the opening price in the next day, a negative relationship between upper daily limit and the return between the closing price and the opening price in the next day, and a positive relationship between daily stock price limits and the fair value.

Discretionary Reporting of Stock Options by IPO Firms

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Beams ◽  
Anthony J. Amoruso ◽  
Frederick M. Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Peer Group ◽  
Price Volatility ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Employee Stock Options ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Option Values ◽  
Public Offering

The revision of SFAS No. 123 (SFAS No. 123R, FASB 2004) requires companies to recognize the fair value of employee stock options. In addition, nonpublic companies will no longer be permitted to assume stock price volatility of zero when calculating the fair value of their stock options. This study finds that the zero volatility assumption allowed under the original version of SFAS No. 123 (FASB 1995) resulted in an average estimated fair value of options that was $1.06 (40 percent) less than the fair value calculated using a peer group volatility estimate for firms undergoing an initial public offering (IPO). However, IPO firms that estimated their volatility underreported option values by an even larger magnitude than the group using the zero volatility assumption. Perhaps these firms reported a downward-biased estimate of volatility to inhibit analysts from computing option values using more reasonable volatility estimates. Contrary to the findings for public companies, we find that a large percentage of sample firms issued in-the-money options prior to going public. Following the IPO, only a small portion of firms issued in-the-money options. The concerns regarding recognizing option expense may be less important than the benefits of granting in-the-money options for IPO firms.

The Reliability of Fair Value versus Historical Cost Information: Evidence from Closed-End Mutual Funds

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Carroll ◽  
Thomas J. Linsmeier ◽  
Kathy R. Petroni
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Stock Prices ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Cost Information ◽  
G7 Countries ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
Equity Securities

This research examines the value-relevance of fair value accounting relative to historical cost accounting for financial instruments held by closed-end mutual funds to provide evidence on the reliability of fair value estimation. Closed-end funds are considered because their balance sheets and income statements typically are reported at fair value and there is great variation in the types of securities held by various funds. For a sample of 143 closed-end mutual funds during 1982–1997, we find a significant association between stock prices and the fair value of investment securities, as well as between stock returns and fair value securities gains and losses, even after controlling for historical costs. To examine whether differences in the perceived reliability of the investment securities fair values affect investors' assessments of the usefulness of the information, we examine the association between stock price metrics and fair values across different fund types (e.g., publicly held equity securities from G7 countries, equity securities other than those publicly held from G7 countries, U.S. government or municipal securities, corporate bonds). We find that in all cases there is a significant association between the stock price metrics and fair values. This suggests that the need to estimate fair values for securities traded in thin markets, such as private or non-G7 equities, does not cause the incremental value-relevance of fair value information to be eliminated. Our strong and consistent findings in the closed-end fund setting suggest that reliability problems in measuring the fair values of investment securities are not the primary explanation for the inconsistency in prior research results; instead such inconsistency may be attributed to the incomplete availability of fair value measures in other settings.

scholarly journals How COVID-19 impacts Vietnam’s banking stocks: An event study method

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-102
Author(s):  
Phuong Lai Cao Mai
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Stock Prices ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
First Case ◽  
Epidemic Area ◽  
Event Study Method ◽  
Before And After

The banking industry is one of the major industries in the Vietnamese stock market, so understanding how the industry index reacts to unusual events such as COVID-19’s impact is very important for the development of the Vietnamese stock market. This study examines the response of the banking sector index to three lockdown/blockage announcements to prevent the COVID-19 epidemic in Vietnam in 2020. Three times of lockdown/blockage: On February 13, 2020, blockade of Son Loi commune, Vinh Phuc province; on March 30, 2020, Vietnam announced the nationwide epidemic of COVID-19 and then nationwide lockdown, and on July 28, 2020, blockade in Da Nang. In the first case, the abnormal returns changed the sign around the notification date indicating that the stock price deviated from its fair value, but accumulating abnormal returns CAR (0;3] and CAR (0; 2] are both positive and statistically significant, which means that investors are more secure when the epidemic area is tightly controlled. The nationwide lockdown was the event that had the strongest impact on the stock price when both AR and CAR were negative and statistically significant before and after the date of the event’s announcement. Nationwide lockdown was the event that had the strongest impact on stock prices as both AR and CAR were negative in the days before and days after the event. This result supports the theory of imperfect substitution. Only AR [2] was positive and statistically significant, showing that the blockade event in Da Nang had a slight impact on the banking sector’s stock price.

scholarly journals Diluted Earnings Per Share Overstatement Bias: Including Unrecognized Employee Compensation In Proceeds From Assumed Exercise Of Employee Stock Options Under The Treasury Stock Method

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1657
Author(s):  
David T. Doran
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Stock Option ◽  
Employee Stock Options ◽  
Employee Compensation ◽  
Earnings Per Share ◽  
Service Period ◽  
Free Environment

Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require firms to recognize compensation expense under the fair value method in the case of employee stock options. Straight line amortization of the options grant date fair value must be recognized as expense over the service period which decreases the earnings per share numerator. For diluted earnings per share (EPS), GAAP requires using the treasury stock method, where proceeds from assumed stock option exercise is used to purchase treasury shares at the average for the period price. Exercise proceeds include the exercise price plus unrecognized future employee compensation. For profitable firms, exercise is assumed if dilutive - more shares are assumed issued than are reacquired for the treasury which increases the diluted EPS denominator. These requirements are consistent across US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This paper tests whether including unrecognized employee compensation in proceeds from the assumed exercise of employee stock options under the treasury stock method is appropriate. A simple multi period model that assumes a risk free environment with complete certainty is applied. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that future unrecognized employee compensation should not be included in proceeds from the assumed exercise of stock options under the treasury stock method. Doing so consistently causes diluted EPS overstatement, and in certain instances causes assumed exercise of in the money options to be antidilutive, which results in complete exclusion from the diluted EPS calculation. This research extends the employee stock option work of Doran (2005 and 2008) that found: 1) Compensation expense recognized over the employee service period should equal the periodic annuity amount that provides the options grant date fair value, and 2) Treasury shares should be assumed purchased at the higher end of period stock price.

Assessing the Financial Reporting Consequences of Conversion to IFRS: The Case of Equity-Based Compensation

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Lea McAnally ◽  
Sean T. McGuire ◽  
Connie D. Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Intrinsic Value ◽  
Price Volatility ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Tax Benefits ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Accounting Reports

SYNOPSIS: The potential conversion of accounting standards from U.S. GAAP to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) raises the issue of unknown financial reporting consequences. We consider one important accounting issue, namely equity-based compensation, and study how IFRS conversion will affect financial statements and the quality of reported numbers. The difference between the two standards is that IFRS reports tax benefits from equity-based compensation at their intrinsic value each period. This amounts to quasi fair-value accounting under IFRS compared to historic-cost accounting under GAAP. We develop and compare pro forma GAAP and IFRS accounting reports for a broad cross section of U.S. firms. We find that IFRS yields lower deferred tax assets and recognized tax benefits for approximately two-thirds of the option grants in our sample. Moreover, reported tax items will be more volatile under IFRS and these effects will be more pronounced for firms with greater option use and stock price volatility. Importantly, we find that IFRS tax items are better able to predict future cash flows. One conclusion is that IFRS improves the relevance, and thereby, the quality, of at least some reported numbers.

scholarly journals Employee Stock Options And Diluted Earnings Per Share

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Doran
Keyword(s):  
Stock Price ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Intrinsic Value ◽  
Market Price ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Employee Stock Options ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Earnings Per Share ◽  
Free Environment ◽  
Period Model

At the time of this writing, SFAS No.123 (1995) prescribes GAAP in accounting for employee stock options.  It allows firms to choose either the intrinsic or fair value method in determining the amount of compensation expense recognized for employee stock options.  The choice of method affects the numerator of the earnings per share (EPS) calculation.   The FASB recently issued a revised SFAS No. 123 (2004) which will require uniform application of the fair value method.  GAAP also requires that the denominator for the diluted EPS calculation be increased for incremental shares under the treasury stock method.  SFAS 128 requires the treasury stock method be applied where the proceeds from the assumed exercise of options are used to acquire shares of the firm’s outstanding stock at the average market price for the period.  Previous to SFAS No. 128, APB Opinion No. 15 required that the higher of average or period ending stock price be used in determining the number of shares reacquired with the proceeds from the assumed exercise of stock options.  This paper develops a simple one period model that assumes a risk free environment with complete certainty conditions in testing the accuracy of EPS calculated under GAAP using the fair value method vs. the intrinsic value method.   The results indicate that EPS reported under the intrinsic value method are overstated, and further indicate that a combination of both the fair value method and the treasury stock method is needed in calculating diluted EPS.  This fair value and treasury stock method combination is shown to not “double count” the stock option’s impact upon EPS.  The results also indicate a slight misstatement of diluted EPS under the fair value method when applying the treasury stock method requirements of SFAS No. 128.  Correct EPS results when shares are assumed reacquired for the treasury at the higher year ending price, consistent with superseded APB 15.  However, the diluted EPS misstatement is so slight that the FASB’s rationale for always requiring the use of average period price seems likely to be justified.  The findings of this research support the requirements of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) and SFAS No. 128.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document