Carotid artery stenting, what can be learned after more than 1,000 patients: a single centre single operator experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 820-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaudija Bijuklic ◽  
Thilo Tübler ◽  
Andreas Wandler ◽  
Heinrich Goossens ◽  
Joachim Schofer
2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. 207-210
Author(s):  
Josef Veselka ◽  
Petra Zimolová ◽  
Daniela Černá ◽  
Pavel Stanka ◽  
Aleš Tomek ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Hawkes ◽  
Aviraj Deshmukh ◽  
Brian van Adel

Introduction: One of the most feared complications of carotid revascularization, including carotid artery stenting (CAS), is peri-procedural ischemic stroke. Several studies suggest that the use of a distal embolic protection device (EPD), as well as over-sized pre- and post-stenting balloon angioplasty, may increase the risk of dislodgement of atheromatous plaque in patients undergoing CAS. The CREST trial, that mandated the use of an EPD, had a peri-procedural ischemic stroke rate of 4.1%. We hypothesize that our technique of stenting without the use of an EPD and sub-maximal angioplasty will have a low risk of peri-procedural complications. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive cases of ICA stenting without use of an embolic protection device between January 2012 and June 2020 at a Canadian stroke centre. Data was extracted from the patient electronic medical record and Picture Archives and Communications Systems (PACS). Both symptomatic and asymptomatic CAS cases were included. Results: A total of 220 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 70 years (range 39-93 years), and 83 patients (38%) were female. The vast majority of patients were symptomatic (216 patients [98%]). A large portion of patients had a contralateral ICA occlusion or near occlusion (56 patients [25%]). In the majority of cases, a Precise Cordis RX carotid stent (Cordis) was placed. There were four patients with peri-procedural ischemic strokes (1.8%), with two occurring 8-30 days after stenting. There was one case of acute stent occlusion associated with an ischemic stroke. Two patients (less than 1%) had hyperperfusion syndrome after CAS. Median length of stay following the procedure was one day. Conclusions: In this single centre series, the peri-procedural risks of CAS without using an EPD are low. The ischemic stroke rate is less than 2%, lower than what has been reported in large randomized controlled trials using embolic protection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erasmia Broussalis ◽  
Christoph Griessenauer ◽  
Sebastian Mutzenbach ◽  
Slaven Pikija ◽  
Hendrik Jansen ◽  
...  

IntroductionDespite various measures to protect against distal embolization during carotid artery stenting (CAS), periprocedural ischemic lesions are still encountered.ObjectiveTo evaluate the periprocedural cerebral diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) lesion burden after CASPER stent placement.MethodsPatients who underwent CAS using the CASPER stent system were reviewed. Degrees of carotid stenosis and plaque configuration were determined. All patients were pretreated with dual antiplatelet agents and cerebral pre- and postprocedural MRI was obtained. All CAS procedures were performed by a single operator.ResultsA total of 110 patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (median degree of stenosis 80%, median length of stenosis 10 mm) were treated with CAS. Hypoechogenic or heterogeneous, mostly hypoechogenic, plaques were documented in 48.6% (52/107) of patients. Carotid ulceration was present in 15.9% (17/107). Postprocedurally, 7.3% (8/110) of patients were found to have ischemic DWI lesions. They were asymptomatic in all patients. Follow-up at 90 days was available in 88.2% (97/110) of patients with excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–1) in 95.9% (93/97).ConclusionCarotid artery stenting using the new CASPER stent in combination with a distal embolic protection device is safe and results in a lower rate of periprocedural DWI lesion burden compared with reported results for historic controls.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Kosowski ◽  
Wojciech Zimoch ◽  
Tomasz Gwizdek ◽  
Radosław Konieczny ◽  
Piotr Kübler ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1543
Author(s):  
D. Lindström ◽  
M. Jonsson ◽  
J. Formgren ◽  
M. Delle ◽  
S. Rosfors ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document