scholarly journals A machine learning model for predicting favorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients after 6 months

Author(s):  
Mehdi Nourelahi ◽  
Fardad Dadboud ◽  
Hosseinali Khalili ◽  
Amin Niakan ◽  
Hossein Parsaei
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 2231-2236
Author(s):  
Marianna La Rocca ◽  
Rachael Garner ◽  
Dominique Duncan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0207192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Shyuan Rau ◽  
Pao-Jen Kuo ◽  
Peng-Chen Chien ◽  
Chun-Ying Huang ◽  
Hsiao-Yun Hsieh ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Meinert ◽  
Michael J. Bell ◽  
Sandra Buttram ◽  
Patrick M. Kochanek ◽  
Goundappa K. Balasubramani ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin John ◽  
Aaron McPheters ◽  
Andrew Donovan ◽  
Nicolas K Khattar ◽  
Jacob R Shpilberg ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) in the context of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a neurosurgical emergency. Predictive models have been used in an attempt to modulate the morbidity and mortality of patient outcomes. We used machine learning (ML) to identify admission risk factors predictive of long-term morbidity in the severe TBI patient population with aSDH. METHODS Between 2013 and 2016, 85 patients with severe TBI and aSDH were included in the analysis. Random forest, ML architecture, was used to create a predictive model of long-term morbidity stratification. About 46 patients were included in the high morbidity group [Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 1-2] and 39 patients were in the low morbidity group (GOS 3-5). We included 30 admission input variables including medical and surgical co-morbidities, neurological examination, laboratory values, and radiographic findings. RESULTS The predictive model showed a 78% precision. The highest scoring input variable was the pupillary examination in predicting high vs low morbidity (bilaterally unreactive vs symmetrically reactive; P < .0001). GCS on admission was higher in the low morbidity group (4 [3-7] vs 7 [3-7]; P < .0101). Rotterdam scores were higher in the high-morbidity group (3 [3-5] vs 4 [4-5]; P < .0032). GCS motor examination on admission was higher in the low-morbidity group (5 [1-5] vs. 2 [1-5]; P < .0106). The basal cisterns were found to be more patent in patients with the low-morbidity group (P = .0012). CONCLUSION ML is an efficient tool that can provide a reasonable level of accuracy in predicting long-term morbidity in patients with severe TBI and aSDH. Monitoring these admission criteria can help with risk-stratification of patients into higher and low risk tracks. Integration of ML into the treatment algorithm may allow the development of more refined guidelines to guide goal-directed therapy.


Injury ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Daley ◽  
Saoirse Cameron ◽  
Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan ◽  
Maitray A. Patel ◽  
Tanya Charyk Stewart ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Vedantam ◽  
Claudia S. Robertson ◽  
Shankar P. Gopinath

OBJECTIVEEarly withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment due to expected poor prognosis is responsible for the majority of in-house deaths in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). With increased focus on the decision and timing of withdrawal of care in patients with severe TBI, data on early neurological recovery in patients with a favorable outcome is needed to guide physicians and families.METHODSThe authors reviewed prospectively collected data obtained in 1241 patients with head injury who were treated between 1986 and 2012. Patients with severe TBI, motor Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS) score < 6 on admission, and those who had favorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score of 4 or 5, indicating moderate disability or good recovery) at 6 months were selected. Baseline demographic, clinical, and imaging data were analyzed. The time from injury to the first record of following commands (mGCS score of 6) after injury was recorded. The temporal profile of GOS scores from discharge to 6 months after the injury was also assessed.RESULTSThe authors studied 218 patients (183 male and 35 female) with a mean age of 28.9 ± 11.2 years. The majority of patients were able to follow commands (mGCS score of 6) within the 1st week after injury (71.4%), with the highest percentage of patients in this group recovering on Day 1 (28.6%). Recovery to the point of following commands beyond 2 weeks after the injury was seen in 14.8% of patients, who experienced significantly longer durations of intracranial pressure monitoring (p = 0.001) and neuromuscular blockade (p < 0.001). In comparison with patients with moderate disability, patients with good recovery had a higher initial GCS score (p = 0.01), lower incidence of anisocoria at admission (p = 0.048), and a shorter ICU stay (p < 0.001) and total hospital stay (p < 0.001). There was considerable improvement in GOS scores from discharge to follow-up at 6 months.CONCLUSIONSUp to 15% of patients with a favorable outcome after severe TBI may begin to follow commands beyond 2 weeks after the injury. These data caution against early withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in patients with severe TBI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Na Ma ◽  
Yi Xuan He ◽  
Fu Ping Bai ◽  
Zhi Peng Song ◽  
Ming Sheng Chen ◽  
...  

Background: There is a high incidence of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (M-STBI), worsening outcomes. This study aimed to design a predictive model for ARF.Methods: Adult patients with M-STBI [3 ≤ Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 12] with a definite history of brain trauma and abnormal head on CT images, obtained from September 2015 to May 2017, were included. Patients with age &gt;80 years or &lt;18 years, multiple injuries with TBI upon admission, or pregnancy (in women) were excluded. Two models based on machine learning extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) or logistic regression, respectively, were developed for predicting ARF within 48 h upon admission. These models were evaluated by out-of-sample validation. The samples were assigned to the training and test sets at a ratio of 3:1.Results: In total, 312 patients were analyzed including 132 (42.3%) patients who had ARF. The GCS and the Marshall CT score, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) on admission significantly predicted ARF. The novel machine learning XGBoost model was superior to logistic regression model in predicting ARF [area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) = 0.903, 95% CI, 0.834–0.966 vs. AUROC = 0.798, 95% CI, 0.697–0.899; p &lt; 0.05].Conclusion: The XGBoost model could better predict ARF in comparison with logistic regression-based model. Therefore, machine learning methods could help to develop and validate novel predictive models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document