Use of a Simplified Polymerase Chain Reaction Procedure to Detect Trypanosoma cruzi in Blood Samples from Chronic Chagasic Patients in a Rural Endemic Area

1994 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Wincker ◽  
Carlos M. Morel ◽  
Constanca Britto ◽  
Walter Oelemann ◽  
Maria Angelica Cardoso ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlota Susana Carriazo ◽  
Adela Sembaj ◽  
Ana Marı́a Aguerri ◽  
José Maria Requena ◽  
Carlos Alonso ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e0007063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan David Ramírez ◽  
Giovanny Herrera ◽  
Carolina Hernández ◽  
Lissa Cruz-Saavedra ◽  
Marina Muñoz ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gláucia Elisete Barbosa Marcon ◽  
Paula Durante Andrade ◽  
Dulcinéia Martins de Albuquerque ◽  
Jamiro da Silva Wanderley ◽  
Eros Antonio de Almeida ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano José Eloy ◽  
Simone Baldini Lucheis

Introduction. American trypanosomiasis, also known as Chagas disease, is a zoonosis caused by Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi). Dogs and cats participate actively in this parasite's transmission cycle. This study aimed at evaluating the occurrence of T. cruzi in dogs and cats from Botucatu, SP, Brazil, as well as at evaluating the technique of hemoculture in LIT (liver infusion tryptose) medium by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Methods. Blood samples were collected from 50 dogs and 50 cats in Botucatu-SP, Brazil. For hemoculture, the samples were inoculated in LIT medium, and readings were performed for four months. Upon completion of such period, all the hemocultures were processed for parasitic DNA extraction. The PCR reactions were performed by using primers TCZ1/TCZ2. Results. Ten dogs and ten cats (20%) were positive to PCR, and four dogs and three cats (7%) were positive to hemoculture. Only in a one cat sample (1%) there was confirmation of positive hemoculture by PCR for T. cruzi. Conclusions. Results showed that PCR was a suitable tool for the confirmation of the parasite detection in hemoculture samples, and that dogs and cats from Botucatu, SP, Brazil, are maintaining the role of household reservoirs of T. cruzi, which reinforces the need for constant epidemiologic surveillance for this zoonosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-379
Author(s):  
Huitao Li ◽  
Xueyu Chen ◽  
Xiaomei Qiu ◽  
Weimin Huang ◽  
Chuanzhong Yang

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is the leading cause of death in neonatal patients, yet the diagnosis of IFI remains a major challenge. At present, most IFI laboratory diagnostic methods are based on classical, but limited, methods such as fungal isolation and culture and histopathological examination. Recently, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) technology have been adopted to quantify nucleic-acid identification. In this study, we established qPCR and ddPCR assays for IFI diagnosis and quantification. qPCR and ddPCR were carried out using identical primers and probe for the amplification of 18S rRNA. Assay results for three fungal strains were positive, whereas ten non-fungal strains had negative results, indicating 100% specificity for both ddPCR and qPCR methods. Genomic DNA of Candida albicans was tested after a serial dilution to compare the sensitivity of the two PCR methods. The limit of detection of ddPCR was 3.2 copies/L, which was a ten-fold increase compared with that of the qPCR method (32 copies/L). Blood samples from 127 patients with high-risk factors and clinical symptoms for IFI were collected from a NICU in Shenzhen, China, and analyzed using qPCR and ddPCR. Thirty-four blood samples from neonates had a proven or probable diagnosis of IFI, and 25 of these were positive by qPCR, whereas 30 were positive by ddPCR. Among the 93 blood samples from neonates who had a possible IFI or no IFI, 24 were positive using qPCR, and 7 were positive using ddPCR. In conclusion, ddPCR is a rapid and accurate pan-fungal detection method and provides a promising prospect for IFI clinical screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document